Double stranded constructs comprising one or more short strands hybridized to a longer strand

ABSTRACT

The present invention provides compositions comprising an antisense oligomeric compound hybridized to at least one shorter sense oligomeric compound. The sense oligomeric compounds can be covalently linked to the antisense oligomeric compounds. At least a portion of the antisense oligomeric compound is complementary to and hybridizes with a nucleic acid target. Methods for modulating gene expression are also provided using the compositions of the present invention.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application claims benefit to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/551,670 filed Mar. 8, 2004, which is incorporated herein in its entirety.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides compositions comprising an antisense oligomeric compound and at least one shorter sense oligomeric compound wherein each sense oligomeric compound hybridizes with the antisense oligomeric compound and wherein the antisense oligomeric compound has complementarity to and hybridizes to a target nucleic acid and methods for their use in modulating gene expression. In preferred embodiments compositions of the present invention hybridize to a portion of a target RNA resulting in loss of normal function of the target RNA.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

In many species, introduction of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) induces potent and specific gene silencing. This phenomenon occurs in both plants and animals and has roles in viral defense and transposon silencing mechanisms. This phenomenon was originally described more than a decade ago by researchers working with the petunia flower. While trying to deepen the purple color of these flowers, Jorgensen et al. introduced a pigment-producing gene under the control of a powerful promoter. Instead of the expected deep purple color, many of the flowers appeared variegated or even white. Jorgensen named the observed phenomenon “cosuppression”, since the expression of both the introduced gene and the homologous endogenous gene was suppressed (Napoli et al., Plant Cell, 1990, 2, 279-289; Jorgensen et al., Plant Mol. Biol., 1996, 31, 957-973).

Cosuppression has since been found to occur in many species of plants, fungi, and has been particularly well characterized in Neurospora crassa, where it is known as “quelling” (Cogoni and Macino, Genes Dev. 2000, 10, 638-643; Guru, Nature, 2000, 404, 804-808).

The first evidence that dsRNA could lead to gene silencing in animals came from work in the nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans. In 1995, researchers Guo and Kemphues were attempting to use antisense RNA to shut down expression of the par-1 gene in order to assess its function. As expected, injection of the antisense RNA disrupted expression of par-1, but quizzically, injection of the sense-strand control also disrupted expression (Guo and Kempheus, Cell, 1995, 81, 611-620). This result was a puzzle until Fire et al. injected dsRNA (a mixture of both sense and antisense strands) into C. elegans. This injection resulted in much more efficient silencing than injection of either the sense or the antisense strands alone. Injection of just a few molecules of dsRNA per cell was sufficient to completely silence the homologous gene's expression. Furthermore, injection of dsRNA into the gut of the worm caused gene silencing not only throughout the worm, but also in first generation offspring (Fire et al., Nature, 1998, 391, 806-811).

The potency of this phenomenon led Timmons and Fire to explore the limits of the dsRNA effects by feeding nematodes bacteria that had been engineered to express dsRNA homologous to the C. elegans unc-22 gene. Surprisingly, these worms developed an unc-22 null-like phenotype (Timmons and Fire, Nature 1998, 395, 854; Timmons et al., Gene, 2001, 263, 103-112). Further work showed that soaking worms in dsRNA was also able to induce silencing (Tabara et al., Science, 1998, 282, 430-431). PCT publication WO 01/48183 discloses methods of inhibiting expression of a target gene in a nematode worm involving feeding to the worm a food organism which is capable of producing a double-stranded RNA structure having a nucleotide sequence substantially identical to a portion of the target gene following ingestion of the food organism by the nematode, or by introducing a DNA capable of producing the double-stranded RNA structure (Bogaert et al., 2001).

The posttranscriptional gene silencing defined in Caenorhabditis elegans resulting from exposure to double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) has since been designated as RNA interference (RNAi). This term has come to generalize all forms of gene silencing involving dsRNA leading to the sequence-specific reduction of endogenous targeted mRNA levels; unlike co-suppression, in which transgenic DNA leads to silencing of both the transgene and the endogenous gene. Introduction of exogenous double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) into Caenorhabditis elegans has been shown to specifically and potently disrupt the activity of genes containing homologous sequences. Montgomery et al. suggests that the primary interference effects of dsRNA are post-transcriptional; this conclusion being derived from examination of the primary DNA sequence after dsRNA-mediated interference a finding of no evidence of alterations followed by studies involving alteration of an upstream operon having no effect on the activity of its downstream gene. These results argue against an effect on initiation or elongation of transcription. Finally they observed by in situ hybridization, that dsRNA-mediated interference produced a substantial, although not complete, reduction in accumulation of nascent transcripts in the nucleus, while cytoplasmic accumulation of transcripts was virtually eliminated. These results indicate that the endogenous mRNA is the primary target for interference and suggest a mechanism that degrades the targeted mRNA before translation can occur. It was also found that this mechanism is not dependent on the SMG system, an mRNA surveillance system in C. elegans responsible for targeting and destroying aberrant messages. The authors further suggest a model of how dsRNA might function as a catalytic mechanism to target homologous mRNAs for degradation. (Montgomery et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1998, 95, 15502-15507).

Recently, the development of a cell-free system from syncytial blastoderm Drosophila embryos that recapitulates many of the features of RNAi has been reported. The interference observed in this reaction is sequence specific, is promoted by dsRNA but not single-stranded RNA, functions by specific mRNA degradation, and requires a minimum length of dsRNA. Furthermore, preincubation of dsRNA potentiates its activity demonstrating that RNAi can be mediated by sequence-specific processes in soluble reactions (Tuschl et al., Genes Dev., 1999, 13, 3191-3197).

In subsequent experiments, Tuschl et al, using the Drosophila in vitro system, demonstrated that 21- and 22-nt RNA fragments are the sequence-specific mediators of RNAi. These fragments, which they termed short interfering RNAs (siRNAs) were shown to be generated by an RNase III-like processing reaction from long dsRNA. They also showed that chemically synthesized siRNA duplexes with overhanging 3′ ends mediate efficient target RNA cleavage in the Drosophila lysate, and that the cleavage site is located near the center of the region spanned by the guiding siRNA. In addition, they suggest that the direction of dsRNA processing determines whether sense or antisense target RNA can be cleaved by the siRNA-protein complex (Elbashir et al., Genes Dev., 2001, 15, 188-200). Further characterization of the suppression of expression of endogenous and heterologous genes caused by the 21-23 nucleotide siRNAs have been investigated in several mammalian cell lines, including human embryonic kidney (293) and HeLa cells (Elbashir et al., Nature, 2001, 411, 494-498).

Most recently, Tijsterman et al. have shown that, in fact, single-stranded RNA oligomers of antisense polarity can be potent inducers of gene silencing. As is the case for co-suppression, they showed that antisense RNAs act independently of the RNAi genes rde-1 and rde-4 but require the mutator/RNAi gene mut-7 and a putative DEAD box RNA helicase, mut-14. According to the authors, their data favor the hypothesis that gene silencing is accomplished by RNA primer extension using the mRNA as template, leading to dsRNA that is subsequently degraded suggesting that single-stranded RNA oligomers are ultimately responsible for the RNAi phenomenon (Tijsterman et al., Science, 2002, 295, 694-697).

Several recent publications have described the structural requirements for the dsRNA trigger required for RNAi activity. Recent reports have indicated that ideal dsRNA sequences are 21 nt in length containing 2 nt 3′-end overhangs (Elbashir et al, EMBO (2001), 20, 6877-6887, Sabine Brantl, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 2002, 1575, 15-25.) In this system, substitution of the 4 nucleosides from the 3′-end with 2′-deoxynucleosides has been demonstrated to not affect activity. On the other hand, substitution with 2′deoxynucleosides or 2′-OMe-nucleosides throughout the sequence (sense or antisense) was shown to be deleterious to RNAi activity.

Investigation of the structural requirements for RNA silencing in C. elegans has demonstrated modification of the internucleotide linkage (phosphorothioate) to not interfere with activity (Parrish et al., Molecular Cell, 2000, 6, 1077-1087.) It was also shown by Parrish et al., that chemical modification like 2′-amino or 5′-iodouridine are well tolerated in the sense strand but not the antisense strand of the dsRNA suggesting differing roles for the 2 strands in RNAi. Base modification such as guanine to inosine (where one hydrogen bond is lost) has been demonstrated to decrease RNAi activity independently of the position of the modification (sense or antisense). Some “position independent” loss of activity has been observed following the introduction of mismatches in the dsRNA trigger. Some types of modifications, for example introduction of sterically demanding bases such as 5-iodoU, have been shown to be deleterious to RNAi activity when positioned in the antisense strand, whereas modifications positioned in the sense strand were shown to be less detrimental to RNAi activity. As was the case for the 21 nt dsRNA sequences, RNA-DNA heteroduplexes did not serve as triggers for RNAi. However, dsRNA containing 2′-F-2′-deoxynucleosides appeared to be efficient in triggering RNAi response independent of the position (sense or antisense) of the 2′-F-2′-deoxynucleosides.

In one experiment the reduction of gene expression was studied using electroporated dsRNA and a 25 mer morpholino in post-implantation mouse embryos (Mellitzer et al., Mehanisms of Development, 2002, 118, 57-63). The morpholino oligomer did show activity but was not as effective as the dsRNA.

A number of PCT applications have recently been published that relate to the RNAi phenomenon. These include: PCT publication WO 00/44895; PCT publication WO 00/49035; PCT publication WO 00/63364; PCT publication WO 01/36641; PCT publication WO 01/36646; PCT publication WO 99/32619; PCT publication WO 00/44914; PCT publication WO 01/29058; and PCT publication WO 01/75164.

U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,898,031 and 6,107,094, each of which is commonly owned with this application and each of which is herein incorporated by reference, describe certain oligonucleotide having RNA like properties. When hybridized with RNA, these oligonucleotides serve as substrates for a dsRNase enzyme with resultant cleavage of the RNA by the enzyme.

In another recently published paper (Martinez et al., Cell, 2002, 110, 563-574) it was shown that double stranded as well as single stranded siRNA resides in the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) together with eIF2C1 and eIf2C2 (human GERp950 Argonaute proteins. The activity of 5′-phosphorylated single stranded siRNA was comparable to the double stranded siRNA in the system studied. In a related study, the inclusion of a 5′-phosphate moiety was shown to enhance activity of siRNA's in vivo in Drosophilia embryos (Boutla, et al., Curr. Biol., 2001, 11, 1776-1780). In another study, it was reported that the 5′-phosphate was required for siRNA function in human HeLa cells (Schwarz et al., Molecular Cell, 2002, 10, 537-548).

In one recently published paper the authors claim that inclusion of 2′-O-methyl groups into the sense, antisense or both the sense and antisense strands of a siRNA showed greatly reduced activity (Chiu, Ya-Lin and Rana, Tariq, M., RNA, 2003, 9, 1034-1048).

Recently, it has become clear that non-coding RNA genes produce functional RNA molecules with important roles in regulation of gene expression, as well as in developmental timing, viral surveillance, and immunity. Not only the classic transfer RNAs (tRNAs) and ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs), but also small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs), small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs), small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), tiny non-coding RNAs (tncRNAs) and microRNAs (miRNAs) are now known to act in diverse cellular processes such as chromosome maintenance, gene imprinting, pre-mRNA splicing, guiding RNA modifications, transcriptional regulation, and the control of mRNA translation (Eddy, Nature Reviews Genetics, 2001, 2, 919-929; Kawasaki and Taira, Nature, 2003, 423, 838-842). RNA-mediated processes are now also believed to direct heterochromatin formation, genome rearrangements, and DNA elimination (Cerutti, Trends in Genetics, 2003, 19, 39-46; Couzin, Science, 2002, 298, 2296-2297)

A large class of small non-coding RNAs known as microRNAs (miRNAs) plays a role in regulation of gene expression. In C. elegans, Drosophila, and humans, miRNAs are predicted to function as endogenous post-transcriptional gene regulators. The founding members of the miRNA family are transcribed by the C. elegans genes let-7 and lin-4, and were first dubbed “short temporal RNAs” (stRNAs). The let-7 and lin-4 miRNAs act as antisense translational repressors of messenger RNAs that encode proteins crucial to the heterochronic developmental timing pathway in nematode larva. (Ambros, Cell, 2001, 107, 823-826; Ambros et al., Current Biology, 2003, 13, 807-818).

Mature miRNAs originate from long endogenous primary transcripts (pri-miRNAs) that are often hundreds of nucleotides in length (Lee, et al., EMBO J., 2002, 21(17), 4663-4670). These pri-miRNAs are processed by a nuclear enzyme in the RNase III family known as Drosha, into approximately 70 nucleotide-long pre-miRNAs (also known as stem-loop, hairpin or foldback precursors) which are subsequently processed by the Dicer RNase into mature miRNAs (Lee, et al., Nature, 2003, 425, 415-419). The current model is that the pri-miRNA transcript is processed by Drosha in the nucleus, and the pre-miRNA hairpin precursor is exported from the nucleus and cleaved by Dicer in the cytosol to yield a double-stranded intermediate (similar in size to siRNAs), but only one strand of this short-lived intermediate accumulates as the mature miRNA (Ambros et al., RNA, 2003, 9, 277-279; Bartel and Bartel, Plant Physiology, 2003, 132, 709-717; Shi, Trends in Genetics, 2003, 19, 9-12).

miRNAs, like siRNAs, are processed by the Dicer enzyme, are approximately the same length, and possess the characteristic 5′-phosphate and 3′-hydroxyl termini. The miRNAs are also incorporated into a ribonucleoprotein complex, the miRNP, which is similar to the RNA-induced silencing complex, i.e., the RISC complex, through which siRNAs act (Bartel and Bartel, Plant Physiology, 2003, 132, 709-717). More than 200 different miRNAs have been identified in plants and animals (Ambros et al., Current Biology, 2003, 13, 807-818).

While siRNAs cause gene silencing by target RNA cleavage and degradation, miRNAs are believed to direct translational repression, primarily. This functional difference may be related to the fact that miRNAs tolerate multiple base pair mismatches whereas siRNAs are perfectly complementary to their target substrates (Ambros et al., Current Biology, 2003, 13, 807-818; Bartel and Bartel, Plant Physiology, 2003, 132, 709-717; Shi, Trends in Genetics, 2003, 19, 9-12).

Like the RNAse H pathway, the RNA interference pathway of antisense modulation of gene expression is an effective means for modulating the levels of specific gene products and may therefore prove to be uniquely useful in a number of therapeutic, diagnostic, and research applications involving gene silencing. The present invention therefore further provides compositions useful for modulating gene expression pathways, including those relying on an antisense mechanism of action such as RNA interference and dsRNA enzymes as well as non-antisense mechanisms. One having skill in the art, once armed with this disclosure will be able, without undue experimentation, to identify preferred compositions for these uses.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides novel compositions each comprising an antisense oligomeric compound and at least one shorter sense oligomeric compound that is at least partially hybridized to and forms a duplex region with the antisense oligomeric compound. In one embodiment the composition of comprises at least two sense oligomeric compounds that are each at least partially complementary to the antisense oligomeric compound forming duplex regions between the at least two sense strands and the antisense strand. In a further embodiment the sense oligomeric compound(s) are substantially or completely hybridized to the antisense oligomeric compound. In another embodiment the double stranded portion of the complex is continuous and comprises two sense and one antisense oligomeric compounds. In another embodiment two sense strands form two separate duplexed regions having an unhybridized single stranded region of the antisense oligomeric compound between them.

In one embodiment the composition further comprises at least one covalent linkage between the antisense oligomeric compound and the at least one sense oligomeric compound. In a further embodiment one sense oligomeric compound is covalently linked to the 5′-termini of the antisense oligomeric compound. In another embodiment one sense oligomeric compound is covalently linked to the 3′-termini of the antisense oligomeric compound. In an even further embodiment one sense oligomeric compound is covalently linked to the 5′-termini of the antisense oligomeric compound and another sense oligomeric compound is covalently linked to the 3′-termini of the antisense oligomeric compound.

In one embodiment the each of the covalent linkages independently comprises a sequence of non-hybridizing linked nucleosides or a bifunctional linking group. In a preferred embodiment the bifunctional linking group comprises a polyethylene glycol linking group.

In one embodiment the antisense oligomeric compounds and sense oligomeric compounds comprise pluralities of linked nucleosides linked by internucleoside linking groups. In a preferred embodiment the comformational geometry of each of the linked nucleosides is 3′-endo wherein the 3′-endo comformational geometry can derive from multiple dissimilar nucleoside modifications such as 2′-modified, ring modified or bridging (e.g. bicyclic sugars). In another embodiment each of the nucleosides having 3′-endo conformational geometry comprises a 2′-substitutent group. In one embodiment the each 2′-substituent group is, independently, —F, —OH, —O—CH₂CH₂—O—CH₃, —O—CH₃, —O—CH₂—CH═CH₂ or —O—CH₂—CH—CH₂—NH(R_(j)) where R_(j) is H or C₁-C₁₀ alkyl with a preferred list of 2′-substituent groups including —F, —OH, —O—CH₂CH₂—O—CH₃ or —O—CH₃.

In one embodiment the 3′-endo conformation geometry is due to the nucleosides having a 2′-O—(CH₂)_(n)-4′ bridge (n=1 or 2). In another embodiment the 3′-endo conformation geometry is due to the nucleosides having a 4′-S ring modification. In another embodiment the compositions include at least one native RNA nucleoside (β-D-ribonucleoside). In another embodiment the nucleosides of the compositions are each modified nucleosides having 3′-endo modified nucleosides that are other than 2′-OH groups (2′-H also excluded as not a 3′-endo configuration).

In one embodiment each of the internucleoside linking groups is independently a phosphodiester or a phosphorothioate internucleoside linking group.

In one embodiment the antisense and sense oligomeric compounds optionally comprises a terminal phosphate group, a terminal stabilizing or capping group, a 3′-overhang or a conjugate group. In a preferred embodiment the 5′-terminus of the antisense oligomeric compound comprises a 5′-phosphate group.

In a preferred embodiment the antisense oligomeric compounds are from about 15 to about 30 nucleobases in length and each of the sense oligomeric compound are from about 2 to about 12 nucleobases in length.

In one embodiment of the present invention the at least one sense oligomeric compound is covalently linked to the antisense oligomeric compound. A preferred group of covalent linkages includes a sequence of non-hybridizing linked nucleosides or a bifunctional linking group with preferred bifunctional linking groups including those comprising an (ethylene glycol)₁₋₆ linking group. A further bifunctional linking group includes —O—CH₂CH₂—O—CH₂CH₂—O—CH₂CH₂— a (ethylene glycol)₃ linking group.

In one embodiment of the present invention the composition comprises at least two sense oligomeric compounds wherein the sense compounds each have a region that is complementary to and forms a duplex region with the antisense oligomeric compound. In a further embodiment the at least two sense oligomeric compounds are covalently linked to the antisense oligomeric compound.

In one embodiment of the present invention each of the antisense oligomeric compounds and each of the sense oligomeric compounds comprises a plurality of linked nucleosides linked by internucleoside linking groups.

In one embodiment of the present invention each of the nucleosides of the antisense oligomeric compound is a nucleoside having 3′-endo conformational geometry. In a preferred embodiment the nucleosides having 3′-endo conformational geometry each comprise a 2′-substitutent group. One group of preferred 2′-substituent groups includes —F, —OH, —O—CH₂CH₂—O—CH₃, —O—CH₃, —O—CH₂—CH═CH₂ and groups having one of formula I_(a) or II_(a):

wherein:

-   -   R_(b) is O, S or NH;     -   R_(d) is a single bond, O, S or C(═O);     -   R_(e) is C₁-C₁₀ alkyl, N(R_(k))(R_(m)), N(R_(k))(R_(n)),         N═C(R_(p))(R_(q)), N═C(R_(p))(R_(r)) or has formula III_(a);

-   -   R_(p) and R_(q) are each independently hydrogen or C₁-C₁₀ alkyl;     -   R_(r) is —R_(x)—R_(y);     -   each R_(s), R_(t), R_(u) and R_(v) is, independently, hydrogen,         C(O)R_(w), substituted or unsubstituted C₁-C₁₀ alkyl,         substituted or unsubstituted C₂-C₁₀ alkenyl, substituted or         unsubstituted C₂-C₁₀ alkynyl, alkylsulfonyl, arylsulfonyl, a         chemical functional group or a conjugate group, wherein the         substituent groups are selected from hydroxyl, amino, alkoxy,         carboxy, benzyl, phenyl, nitro, thiol, thioalkoxy, halogen,         alkyl, aryl, alkenyl and alkynyl;     -   or optionally, R_(u) and R_(v), together form a phthalimido         moiety with the nitrogen atom to which they are attached;     -   each R_(w) is, independently, substituted or unsubstituted         C₁-C₁₀ alkyl, trifluoromethyl, cyanoethyloxy, methoxy, ethoxy,         t-butoxy, allyloxy, 9-fluorenylmethoxy,         2-(trimethylsilyl)-ethoxy, 2,2,2-trichloroethoxy, benzyloxy,         butyryl, iso-butyryl, phenyl or aryl;     -   R_(k) is hydrogen, a nitrogen protecting group or —R_(x)—R_(y);     -   R_(p) is hydrogen, a nitrogen protecting group or —R_(x)—R_(y);     -   R_(x) is a bond or a linking moiety;     -   R_(y) is a chemical functional group, a conjugate group or a         solid support medium;     -   each R_(m) and R_(n) is, independently, H, a nitrogen protecting         group, substituted or unsubstituted C₁-C₁₀ alkyl, substituted or         unsubstituted C₂-C₁₀ alkenyl, substituted or unsubstituted         C₂-C₁₀ alkynyl, wherein the substituent groups are selected from         hydroxyl, amino, alkoxy, carboxy, benzyl, phenyl, nitro, thiol,         thioalkoxy, halogen, alkyl, aryl, alkenyl, alkynyl; NH₃ ⁺,         N(R_(u))(R_(v)), guanidino and acyl where the acyl is an acid         amide or an ester;     -   or R_(m) and R_(n), together, are a nitrogen protecting group,         are joined in a ring structure that optionally includes an         additional heteroatom selected from N and O or are a chemical         functional group;     -   R_(i) is OR_(z), SR_(z), or N(R_(z))₂;     -   each R_(z) is, independently, H, C₁-C₈ alkyl, C₁-C₈ haloalkyl,         C(═NH)N(H)R_(u), C(═O)N(H)R_(u) or OC(═O)N(H)R_(u);     -   R_(f), R_(g) and R_(h) comprise a ring system having from about         4 to about 7 carbon atoms or having from about 3 to about 6         carbon atoms and 1 or 2 heteroatoms wherein the heteroatoms are         selected from oxygen, nitrogen and sulfur and wherein the ring         system is aliphatic, unsaturated aliphatic, aromatic, or         saturated or unsaturated heterocyclic;     -   R_(j) is alkyl or haloalkyl having 1 to about 10 carbon atoms,         alkenyl having 2 to about 10 carbon atoms, alkynyl having 2 to         about 10 carbon atoms, aryl having 6 to about 14 carbon atoms,         N(R_(k))(R_(m))OR_(k), halo, SR_(k) or CN;     -   m_(a) is 1 to about 10;     -   each mb is, independently, 0 or 1;     -   mc is 0 or an integer from 1 to 10;     -   md is an integer from 1 to 10;     -   me is from 0, 1 or 2; and     -   provided that when mc is 0, md is greater than 1.

A further group of 2′-substituent groups includes —F, —OH, —O—CH₂CH₂—O—CH₃, —O—CH₃, —O—CH₂—CH═CH₂ or —O—CH₂—CH—CH₂—NH(R_(j)) where R_(j) is H and C₁-C₁₀ alkyl. With a further list of 2′-substituent groups including —F, —OH, —O—CH₂CH₂—O—CH₃ or —O—CH₃.

In one embodiment of the present invention each of the nucleosides of the sense oligomeric compound is a nucleoside having 3′-endo conformational geometry. In another embodiment each of the nucleoside having 3′-endo conformational geometry comprises a 2′-substitutent group. One preferred 2′-substitutent groups is 2′-OH. Another group of preferred 2′-substituent groups includes —F, —OH, —O—CH₂CH₂—O—CH₃, —O—CH₃, —O—CH₂—CH═CH₂ and a group having one of formula I_(a) or II_(a):

wherein:

-   -   R_(b) is O, S or NH;     -   R_(d) is a single bond, O, S or C(═O);     -   R_(e) is C₁-C₁₀ alkyl, N(R_(k))(R_(m)), N(R_(k))(R_(n)),         N═C(R_(p))(R_(q)), N═C(R_(p))(R_(r)) or has formula III_(a);

-   -   R_(p) and R_(q) are each independently hydrogen or C₁-C₁₀ alkyl;     -   R_(r) is —R_(x)—R_(y);     -   each R_(s), R_(t), R_(u) and R_(v) is, independently, hydrogen,         C(O)R_(w), substituted or unsubstituted C₁-C₁₀ alkyl,         substituted or unsubstituted C₂-C₁₀ alkenyl, substituted or         unsubstituted C₂-C₁₀ alkynyl, alkylsulfonyl, arylsulfonyl, a         chemical functional group or a conjugate group, wherein the         substituent groups are selected from hydroxyl, amino, alkoxy,         carboxy, benzyl, phenyl, nitro, thiol, thioalkoxy, halogen,         alkyl, aryl, alkenyl and alkynyl;     -   or optionally, R_(u) and R_(v), together form a phthalimido         moiety with the nitrogen atom to which they are attached;     -   each R_(w) is, independently, substituted or unsubstituted         C₁-C₁₀ alkyl, trifluoromethyl, cyanoethyloxy, methoxy, ethoxy,         t-butoxy, allyloxy, 9-fluorenylmethoxy,         2-(trimethylsilyl)-ethoxy, 2,2,2-trichloroethoxy, benzyloxy,         butyryl, iso-butyryl, phenyl or aryl;     -   R_(k) is hydrogen, a nitrogen protecting group or —R_(x)—R_(y);     -   R_(p) is hydrogen, a nitrogen protecting group or —R_(x)—R_(y);     -   R_(x) is a bond or a linking moiety;     -   R_(y) is a chemical functional group, a conjugate group or a         solid support medium;     -   each R_(m) and R_(n) is, independently, H, a nitrogen protecting         group, substituted or unsubstituted C₁-C₁₀ alkyl, substituted or         unsubstituted C₂-C₁₀ alkenyl, substituted or unsubstituted         C₂-C₁₀ alkynyl, wherein the substituent groups are selected from         hydroxyl, amino, alkoxy, carboxy, benzyl, phenyl, nitro, thiol,         thioalkoxy, halogen, alkyl, aryl, alkenyl, alkynyl; NH₃ ⁺,         N(R_(u))(R_(v)), guanidino and acyl where the acyl is an acid         amide or an ester;     -   or R_(m) and R_(n), together, are a nitrogen protecting group,         are joined in a ring structure that optionally includes an         additional heteroatom selected from N and O or are a chemical         functional group;     -   R_(i) is OR_(z), SR_(z), or N(R_(z))₂;     -   each R_(z) is, independently, H, C₁-C₈ alkyl, C₁-C₈ haloalkyl,         C(═NH)N(H)R_(u), C(═O)N(H)R_(u) or OC(═O)N(H)R_(u);     -   R_(f), R_(g) and R_(h) comprise a ring system having from about         4 to about 7 carbon atoms or having from about 3 to about 6         carbon atoms and 1 or 2 heteroatoms wherein the heteroatoms are         selected from oxygen, nitrogen and sulfur and wherein the ring         system is aliphatic, unsaturated aliphatic, aromatic, or         saturated or unsaturated heterocyclic;     -   R_(j) is alkyl or haloalkyl having 1 to about 10 carbon atoms,         alkenyl having 2 to about 10 carbon atoms, alkynyl having 2 to         about 10 carbon atoms, aryl having 6 to about 14 carbon atoms,         N(R_(k))(R_(m))OR_(k), halo, SR_(k) or CN;     -   m_(a) is 1 to about 10;     -   each mb is, independently, 0 or 1;     -   mc is 0 or an integer from 1 to 10;     -   md is an integer from 1 to 10;     -   me is from 0, 1 or 2; and     -   provided that when mc is 0, md is greater than 1.

A further group of 2′-substituent groups includes —F, —OH, —O—CH₂CH₂—O—CH₃, —O—CH₃, —O—CH₂—CH═CH₂ or —O—CH₂—CH—CH₂—NH(R_(j)) where R_(j) is H and C₁-C₁₀ alkyl. With a further list of 2′-substituent groups including —F, —OH, —O—CH₂CH₂—O—CH₃ or —O—CH₃.

In one embodiment of the present invention each of the internucleoside linking groups of the antisense oligomeric compounds and the sense oligomeric compounds is a phosphorus containing internucleoside linkage. In a preferred embodiment each of the internucleoside linking groups is independently a phosphodiester or a phosphorothioate internucleoside linkage. In another preferred embodiment each of the internucleoside linking groups is phosphodiester internucleoside linkage. In a further preferred embodiment each of the internucleoside linking groups is a phosphorothioate internucleoside linkage.

In one embodiment of the present invention each of the antisense oligomeric compounds and the sense oligomeric compounds optionally comprise a terminal phosphate group, a terminal stabilizing or capping group, a 3′-overhang or a conjugate group. In one preferred embodiment the 3′-terminus of the antisense oligomeric compound comprises a stabilizing or conjugate group wherein a preferred stabilizing group is a dTdT dimer. In another embodiment the 5′-terminus of the antisense oligomeric compound comprises a 5′-phosphate group.

In one embodiment of the present invention the antisense oligomeric compound comprises at least one terminal cap moiety. In a preferred embodiment a terminal cap moiety is attached to one or both of the 3′-terminal and 5′-terminal ends of the antisense oligomeric compound. A preferred terminal cap moiety includes an inverted deoxy abasic moiety.

In one embodiment of the present invention the antisense oligomeric compound has from about 8 to about 80 nucleobases in length. In a further embodiment the antisense oligomeric compound has from about 12 to about 50 nucleobases in length. In an even further embodiment the antisense oligomeric compound has from about 15 to about 30 nucleobases in length.

In one embodiment of the present invention each of the sense oligomeric compounds has from about 2 to about 12 nucleobases in length. In a preferred embodiment each of the sense oligomeric compounds has from about 2 to about 10 nucleobases in length. In another preferred embodiment each of the sense oligomeric compounds has from about 2 to about 7 nucleobases in length.

In one embodiment of the present invention is a method of inhibiting gene expression comprising contacting one or more cells, a tissue or an animal with a composition of the invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides compositions comprising an antisense oligomeric compound and at least one sense oligomeric compound hybridized thereto. The sense oligomeric compounds are shorter than the antisense oligomeric compounds and hybridize to the antisense oligomeric compounds forming double stranded regions. The antisense oligomeric compound can have multiple sense strands bound thereto forming one continuous double stranded composition or can have any configuration resulting from one or more double stranded regions and one or more single stranded regions. At least a portion of the antisense oligomeric compound is complementary to and hybridizes with a nucleic acid target. The compositions can comprise a single strand with the complementary sense strands covalently linked to the antisense oligomeric compounds.

In one embodiment short sense oligomeric compounds having at least partial complementarity to the antisense oligomeric compound are connected thereby forming a single strand. The connection can be a region of non-hybridizing nucleobases or a bifunctional tethering group e.g. a non-nucleic acid linker (see for example WO 94/01550). Examples of such linkers include substituted or unsubstituted alkyl groups. A preferred linking group amenable to the present invention is a poly ethylene glycol linker with (ethylene glycol)₁₋₆ being a preferred range. The synthesis can be easily carried out using commercially available triethylene glycol that has been functionalized to have a dimethoxytrityl (or dimethyltrityl) protective group at one end and a cyanoethylphosphoramidite group at the other end.

In one aspect of the present invention one or more complementary sense strands are bound to an antisense strand that has complementary to a nucleic acid target. Although the antisense oligomeric compounds can be from 8 to 80 nucleobases in length, antisense oligomeric compounds can be from about 12 to about 50 nucleobases in length or about 15 to about 30 nucleobases in length.

In one aspect of the present invention the sense oligomeric compounds are shorter than the antisense oligomeric compounds and have at least a region that is complementary to and hybridizes to the antisense oligomeric compounds. The sense oligomeric compounds can be 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 or 12 nucleobases in length. In one aspect there is one sense oligomeric compound that is 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 or 12 nucleobases in length hybridized at least partially and preferrably completely to the antisense oligomeric compound. In another aspect there are two sense oligomeric compounds that are each 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 or about 12 nucleobases in length hybridized at least partially to the antisense oligomeric compound. In another aspect there are 3 or more small sense oligomeric compounds that are each 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 or about 7 nucleobases in length hybridized at least partially to the antisense oligomeric compound.

The compositions of the present invention can comprise antisense oligomeric compounds and sense oligomeric compounds that are naturally occurring or chemically modified to give a plurality of motifs for each sequence. One preferred modification of the antisense oligomeric compound is a 5′-phosphate group. The bases, sugars and internucleoside linkages of oligonucleotides comprising the compositions of the present invention can be prepared with a myriad of chemical modifications as shown herein and as is know in the art.

Compositions of the present invention will be useful for the modulation of gene expression. In one aspect of the present invention a targeted cell, group of cells, a tissue or an animal is contacted with a composition of the invention to effect reduction, accumulation or increased specificity by reduction of off-target effects of mRNA or RNA that can directly inhibit gene expression. In another embodiment the reduction of mRNA or RNA indirectly upregulates a non-targeted gene through a pathway that relates the targeted gene to a non-targeted gene. Methods and models for the regulation of genes using oligomeric compounds of the invention are illustrated in the examples.

In another embodiment, a method of inhibiting gene expression is disclosed comprising contacting one or more cells, a tissue or an animal with a composition of the invention. Numerous procedures of how to use the compositions of the present invention are illustrated in the examples section.

Compositions of the invention modulate gene expression by hybridizing to a nucleic acid target resulting in loss of its normal function. As used herein, the term “target nucleic acid” or “nucleic acid target” is used for convenience to encompass any nucleic acid capable of being targeted including without limitation DNA, RNA (including pre-mRNA and mRNA or portions thereof) transcribed from such DNA, and also cDNA derived from such RNA. In one embodiment of the invention the target nucleic acid is a messenger RNA. In a further embodiment the degradation of the targeted messenger RNA is facilitated by a RISC complex that is formed with oligomeric compounds of the invention. As such, the compounds of the invention are known as optimized “RISC loaders.” In another embodiment the degradation of the targeted messenger RNA is facilitated by a nuclease such as RNase III. In another embodiment, degradation of target mRNA or target RNA is by the nuclease, RNAse III. The degradation elicited by the compounds of the invention may be in the cytoplasm or nucleus of the cell.

The hybridization of an oligomeric compound of this invention with its target nucleic acid is generally referred to as “antisense”. Consequently, the mechanism in the practice of the embodiments of the invention is referred to herein as “antisense inhibition.” Such antisense inhibition is typically based upon hydrogen bonding-based hybridization of oligonucleotide strands or segments such that at least one strand or segment is cleaved, degraded, or otherwise rendered inoperable. In this regard, it is presently preferred to target specific nucleic acid molecules and their functions for such antisense inhibition.

The functions of DNA to be interfered with can include replication and transcription. Replication and transcription, for example, can be from an endogenous cellular template, a vector, a plasmid construct or otherwise. The functions of RNA to be interfered with can include functions such as translocation of the RNA to a site of protein translation, translocation of the RNA to sites within the cell which are distant from the site of RNA synthesis, translation of protein from the RNA, splicing of the RNA to yield one or more RNA species, and catalytic activity or complex formation involving the RNA which may be engaged in or facilitated by the RNA. In the context of the present invention, “modulation” and “modulation of expression” mean either an increase (stimulation) or a decrease (inhibition) in the amount or levels of a nucleic acid molecule encoding the gene, e.g., DNA or RNA. Inhibition is often the preferred form of modulation of expression and mRNA is often a preferred target nucleic acid.

The compositions and methods of the present invention are also useful in the study, characterization, validation and modulation of small non-coding RNAs. These include, but are not limited to, microRNAs (miRNA), small nuclear RNAs (snRNA), small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNA), small temporal RNAs (stRNA) and tiny non-coding RNAs (tncRNA) or their precursors or processed transcripts or their association with other cellular components.

Small non-coding RNAs have been shown to function in various developmental and regulatory pathways in a wide range of organisms, including plants, nematodes and mammals. MicroRNAs are small non-coding RNAs that are processed from larger precursors by enzymatic cleavage and inhibit translation of mRNAs. stRNAs, while processed from precursors much like miRNAs, have been shown to be involved in developmental timing regulation. Other non-coding small RNAs are involved in events as diverse as cellular splicing of transcripts, translation, transport, and chromosome organization.

As modulators of small non-coding RNA function, the compositions of the present invention find utility in the control and manipulation of cellular functions or processes such as regulation of splicing, chromosome packaging or methylation, control of developmental timing events, increase or decrease of target RNA expression levels depending on the timing of delivery into the specific biological pathway and translational or transcriptional control. In addition, the compositions of the present invention can be modified in order to optimize their effects in certain cellular compartments, such as the cytoplasm, nucleus, nucleolus or mitochondria.

The compositions of the present invention can further be used to identify components of regulatory pathways of RNA processing or metabolism as well as in screening assays or devices.

The compounds and compositions of the present invention can further be used to minimize off target effects.

Oligomeric Compounds

In the context of the present invention, the term “oligomeric compound” refers to a polymeric structure capable of hybridizing a region of a nucleic acid molecule. This term includes oligonucleotides, oligonucleosides, oligonucleotide analogs, oligonucleotide mimetics and combinations of these. Oligomeric compounds are routinely prepared linearly but can be joined or otherwise prepared to be circular and may also include branching. Oligomeric compounds can included double stranded constructs such as for example two strands hybridized to form double stranded compounds. The double stranded compounds can be linked or separate and can include overhangs on the ends. In general an oligomeric compound comprises a backbone of linked momeric subunits where each linked momeric subunit is directly or indirectly attached to a heterocyclic base moiety. Oligomeric compounds may also include monomeric subunits that are not linked to a heterocyclic base moiety thereby providing abasic sites. The linkages joining the monomeric subunits, the sugar moieties or surrogates and the heterocyclic base moieties can be independently modified giving rise to a plurality of motifs for the resulting oligomeric compounds including hemimers, gapmers and chimeras.

As is known in the art, a nucleoside is a base-sugar combination. The base portion of the nucleoside is normally a heterocyclic base moiety. The two most common classes of such heterocyclic bases are purines and pyrimidines. Nucleotides are nucleosides that further include a phosphate group covalently linked to the sugar portion of the nucleoside. For those nucleosides that include a pentofuranosyl sugar, the phosphate group can be linked to either the 2′, 3′ or 5′ hydroxyl moiety of the sugar. In forming oligonucleotides, the phosphate groups covalently link adjacent nucleosides to one another to form a linear polymeric compound. The respective ends of this linear polymeric structure can be joined to form a circular structure by hybridization or by formation of a covalent bond, however, open linear structures are generally preferred. Within the oligonucleotide structure, the phosphate groups are commonly referred to as forming the internucleoside linkages of the oligonucleotide. The normal internucleoside linkage of RNA and DNA is a 3′ to 5′ phosphodiester linkage.

In the context of this invention, the term “oligonucleotide” refers to an oligomer or polymer of ribonucleic acid (RNA) or deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA). This term includes oligonucleotides composed of naturally-occurring nucleobases, sugars and covalent internucleoside linkages. The term “oligonucleotide analog” refers to oligonucleotides that have one or more non-naturally occurring portions which function in a similar manner to oligonucleotides. Such non-naturally occurring oligonucleotides are often preferred the naturally occurring forms because of desirable properties such as, for example, enhanced cellular uptake, enhanced affinity for nucleic acid target and increased stability in the presence of nucleases.

In the context of this invention, the term “oligonucleoside” refers to a sequence of nucleosides that are joined by internucleoside linkages that do not have phosphorus atoms. Internucleoside linkages of this type include short chain alkyl, cycloalkyl, mixed heteroatom alkyl, mixed heteroatom cycloalkyl, one or more short chain heteroatomic and one or more short chain heterocyclic. These internucleoside linkages include but are not limited to siloxane, sulfide, sulfoxide, sulfone, acetyl, formacetyl, thioformacetyl, methylene formacetyl, thioformacetyl, alkenyl, sulfamate; methyleneimino, methylenehydrazino, sulfonate, sulfonamide, amide and others having mixed N, O, S and CH₂ component parts.

Representative United States patents that teach the preparation of the above oligonucleosides include, but are not limited to, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,034,506; 5,166,315; 5,185,444; 5,214,134; 5,216,141; 5,235,033; 5,264,562; 5,264,564; 5,405,938; 5,434,257; 5,466,677; 5,470,967; 5,489,677; 5,541,307; 5,561,225; 5,596,086; 5,602,240; 5,610,289; 5,602,240; 5,608,046; 5,610,289; 5,618,704; 5,623,070; 5,663,312; 5,633,360; 5,677,437; 5,792,608; 5,646,269 and 5,677,439, certain of which are commonly owned with this application, and each of which is herein incorporated by reference.

Further included in the present invention are oligomeric compounds such as antisense oligomeric compounds, antisense oligonucleotides, ribozymes, external guide sequence (EGS) oligonucleotides, alternate splicers, primers, probes, and other oligomeric compounds which hybridize to at least a portion of the target nucleic acid. As such, these oligomeric compounds may be introduced in the form of single-stranded, double-stranded, circular or hairpin oligomeric compounds and may contain structural elements such as internal or terminal bulges or loops. Once introduced to a system, the oligomeric compounds of the invention may elicit the action of one or more enzymes or structural proteins to effect modification of the target nucleic acid.

One non-limiting example of such an enzyme is RNAse H, a cellular endonuclease which cleaves the RNA strand of an RNA:DNA duplex. It is known in the art that single-stranded antisense oligomeric compounds which are “DNA-like” elicit RNAse H. Activation of RNase H, therefore, results in cleavage of the RNA target, thereby greatly enhancing the efficiency of oligonucleotide-mediated inhibition of gene expression. Similar roles have been postulated for other ribonucleases such as those in the RNase III and ribonuclease L family of enzymes.

While the preferred form of antisense oligomeric compound is a single-stranded antisense oligonucleotide, in many species the introduction of double-stranded structures, such as double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) molecules, has been shown to induce potent and specific antisense-mediated reduction of the function of a gene or its associated gene products. This phenomenon occurs in both plants and animals and is believed to have an evolutionary connection to viral defense and transposon silencing.

As optimized RISC loaders, the compounds of the present invention preferentially bind to dsRNA binding motifs in cellular complexes. One such complex is the RISC (RNA induced silencing complex) complex.

In addition to the modifications described above, the nucleosides of the oligomeric compounds of the invention can have a variety of other modification so long as these other modifications either alone or in combination with other nucleosides enhance one or more of the desired properties described above. Thus, for nucleotides that are incorporated into oligonucleotides of the invention, these nucleotides can have sugar portions that correspond to naturally-occurring sugars or modified sugars. Representative modified sugars include carbocyclic or acyclic sugars, sugars having substituent groups at one or more of their 2′, 3′ or 4′ positions and sugars having substituents in place of one or more hydrogen atoms of the sugar. Additional nucleosides amenable to the present invention having altered base moieties and or altered sugar moieties are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,687,808 and PCT application PCT/US89/02323.

Altered base moieties or altered sugar moieties also include other modifications consistent with the spirit of this invention. Such oligonucleotides are best described as being structurally distinguishable from, yet functionally interchangeable with, naturally occurring or synthetic wild type oligonucleotides. All such oligonucleotides are comprehended by this invention so long as they function effectively to mimic the structure of a desired RNA or DNA strand. A class of representative base modifications include tricyclic cytosine analog, termed “G clamp” (Lin, et al, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 8531). This analog makes four hydrogen bonds to a complementary guanine (G) within a helix by simultaneously recognizing the Watson-Crick and Hoogsteen faces of the targeted G. This G clamp modification when incorporated into phosphorothioate oligonucleotides, dramatically enhances antisense potencies in cell culture. The oligonucleotides of the invention also can include phenoxazine-substituted bases of the type disclosed by Flanagan, et al., Nat. Biotechnol. 1999, 17(1), 48-52.

The antisense oligomeric compounds in accordance with this invention preferably comprise from about 8 to about 80 nucleobases (i.e. from about 8 to about 80 linked nucleosides). One of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the invention embodies oligomeric compounds of 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, or 80 nucleobases in length.

In one preferred embodiment, the antisense oligomeric compounds of the invention are 12 to 50 nucleobases in length. One having ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that this embodies oligomeric compounds of 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, or 50 nucleobases in length.

In another preferred embodiment, the antisense oligomeric compounds of the invention are 15 to 30 nucleobases in length. One having ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that this embodies oligomeric compounds of 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, or 30 nucleobases in length.

Particularly preferred antisense oligomeric compounds are oligonucleotides from about 12 to about 50 nucleobases, even more preferably those comprising from about 15 to about 30 nucleobases.

Oligomer and Monomer Modifications

As is known in the art, a nucleoside is a base-sugar combination. The base portion of the nucleoside is normally a heterocyclic base. The two most common classes of such heterocyclic bases are the purines and the pyrimidines. Nucleotides are nucleosides that further include a phosphate group covalently linked to the sugar portion of the nucleoside. For those nucleosides that include a pentofuranosyl sugar, the phosphate group can be linked to either the 2′, 3′ or 5′ hydroxyl moiety of the sugar. In forming oligonucleotides, the phosphate groups covalently link adjacent nucleosides to one another to form a linear polymeric compound. In turn, the respective ends of this linear polymeric compound can be further joined to form a circular compound, however, linear compounds are generally preferred. In addition, linear compounds may have internal nucleobase complementarity and may therefore fold in a manner as to produce a fully or partially double-stranded compound. Within oligonucleotides, the phosphate groups are commonly referred to as forming the internucleoside linkage or in conjunction with the sugar ring the backbone of the oligonucleotide. The normal internucleoside linkage that makes up the backbone of RNA and DNA is a 3′ to 5′ phosphodiester linkage.

Chimeric Oligomeric Compounds

It is not necessary for all positions in a oligomeric compound to be uniformly modified, and in fact more than one of the aforementioned modifications may be incorporated in a single oligomeric compound or even at a single monomeric subunit such as a nucleoside within a oligomeric compound. The present invention also includes oligomeric compounds which are chimeric oligomeric compounds. “Chimeric” oligomeric compounds or “chimeras,” in the context of this invention, are oligomeric compounds containing two or more chemically distinct regions, each made up of at least one monomer unit, i.e., a nucleotide in the case of a nucleic acid based oligomer.

Chimeric oligomeric compounds typically contain at least one region modified so as to confer increased resistance to nuclease degradation, increased cellular uptake, and/or increased binding affinity for the target nucleic acid. An additional region of the oligomeric compound may serve as a substrate for enzymes capable of cleaving RNA:DNA or RNA:RNA hybrids. By way of example, RNase H is a cellular endonuclease which cleaves the RNA strand of an RNA:DNA duplex. Activation of RNase H, therefore, results in cleavage of the RNA target, thereby greatly enhancing the efficiency of inhibition of gene expression. Consequently, comparable results can often be obtained with shorter oligomeric compounds when chimeras are used, compared to for example phosphorothioate deoxyoligonucleotides hybridizing to the same target region. Cleavage of the RNA target can be routinely detected by gel electrophoresis and, if necessary, associated nucleic acid hybridization techniques known in the art.

Chimeric oligomeric compounds of the invention may be formed as composite structures of two or more oligonucleotides, oligonucleotide analogs, oligonucleosides and/or oligonucleotide mimetics as described above. Such oligomeric compounds have also been referred to in the art as hybrids hemimers, gapmers or inverted gapmers. Representative United States patents that teach the preparation of such hybrid structures include, but are not limited to, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,013,830; 5,149,797; 5,220,007; 5,256,775; 5,366,878; 5,403,711; 5,491,133; 5,565,350; 5,623,065; 5,652,355; 5,652,356; and 5,700,922, certain of which are commonly owned with the instant application, and each of which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.

Oligomer Mimetics

Another preferred group of oligomeric compounds amenable to the present invention includes oligonucleotide mimetics. The term mimetic as it is applied to oligonucleotides is intended to include oligomeric compounds wherein the furanose ring or the furanose ring and the internucleotide linkage are replaced with novel groups, replacement of only the furanose ring is also referred to in the art as being a sugar surrogate. The heterocyclic base moiety or a modified heterocyclic base moiety is maintained for hybridization with an appropriate target nucleic acid.

One such oligomeric compound, an oligonucleotide mimetic that has been shown to have excellent hybridization properties, is referred to as a peptide nucleic acid (PNA). PNA's have favorable hybridization properties, high biological stability and are electrostatically neutral molecules. In one recent study PNA's were used to correct aberrant splicing in a transgenic mouse model (Sazani et al., Nat. Biotechnol., 2002, 20, 1228-1233). In PNA oligomeric compounds, the sugar-backbone of an oligonucleotide is replaced with an amide containing backbone, in particular an aminoethylglycine backbone. The nucleobases are retained and are bound directly or indirectly to aza nitrogen atoms of the amide portion of the backbone. Representative United States patents that teach the preparation of PNA oligomeric compounds include, but are not limited to, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,539,082; 5,714,331; and 5,719,262, each of which is herein incorporated by reference. PNA's can be obtained commercially from Applied Biosystems (Foster City, Calif., USA).

Numerous modifications have been made to the basic PNA backbone since it was introduced in 1991 by Nielsen and coworkers (Nielsen et al., Science, 1991, 254, 1497-1500). The basic structure is shown below:

wherein

-   -   Bx is a heterocyclic base moiety;     -   T₄ is hydrogen, an amino protecting group, —C(O)R₅, substituted         or unsubstituted C₁-C₁₀ alkyl, substituted or unsubstituted         C₂-C₁₀ alkenyl, substituted or unsubstituted C₂-C₁₀ alkynyl,         alkylsulfonyl, arylsulfonyl, a chemical functional group, a         reporter group, a conjugate group, a D or L α-amino acid linked         via the α-carboxyl group or optionally through the ω-carboxyl         group when the amino acid is aspartic acid or glutamic acid or a         peptide derived from D, L or mixed D and L amino acids linked         through a carboxyl group, wherein the substituent groups are         selected from hydroxyl, amino, alkoxy, carboxy, benzyl, phenyl,         nitro, thiol, thioalkoxy, halogen, alkyl, aryl, alkenyl and         alkynyl;     -   T₅ is —OH, —N(Z₁)Z₂, R₅, D or L α-amino acid linked via the         α-amino group or optionally through the ω-amino group when the         amino acid is lysine or ornithine or a peptide derived from D, L         or mixed D and L amino acids linked through an amino group, a         chemical functional group, a reporter group or a conjugate         group;     -   Z₁ is hydrogen, C₁-C₆ alkyl, or an amino protecting group;     -   Z₂ is hydrogen, C₁-C₆ alkyl, an amino protecting group,         —C(═O)—(CH₂)_(n)-J-Z₃, a D or L α-amino acid linked via the         α-carboxyl group or optionally through the ω-carboxyl group when         the amino acid is aspartic acid or glutamic acid or a peptide         derived from D, L or mixed D and L amino acids linked through a         carboxyl group;     -   Z₃ is hydrogen, an amino protecting group, —C₁-C₆ alkyl,         —C(═O)—CH₃, benzyl, benzoyl, or —(CH₂)_(n)—N(H)Z₁;     -   each J is O, S or NH;     -   R₅ is a carbonyl protecting group; and     -   n is from 2 to about 50.

Another class of oligonucleotide mimetic that has been studied is based on linked morpholino units (morpholino nucleic acid) having heterocyclic bases attached to the morpholino ring. A number of linking groups have been reported that link the morpholino monomeric units in a morpholino nucleic acid. A preferred class of linking groups have been selected to give a non-ionic oligomeric compound. The non-ionic morpholino-based oligomeric compounds are less likely to have undesired interactions with cellular proteins. Morpholino-based oligomeric compounds are non-ionic mimics of oligonucleotides which are less likely to form undesired interactions with cellular proteins (Dwaine A. Braasch and David R. Corey, Biochemistry, 2002, 41(14), 4503-4510). Morpholino-based oligomeric compounds have been studied in ebrafish embryos (see: Genesis, volume 30, issue 3, 2001 and Heasman, J., Dev. Biol., 2002, 243, 209-214). Further studies of Morpholino-based oligomeric compounds have also been reported (see: Nasevicius et al., Nat. Genet., 2000, 26, 216-220; and Lacerra et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 2000, 97, 9591-9596). Morpholino-based oligomeric compounds are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,034,506, issued Jul. 23, 1991. The morpholino class of oligomeric compounds have been prepared having a variety of different linking groups joining the monomeric subunits.

Morpholino nucleic acids have been prepared having a variety of different linking groups (L₂) joining the monomeric subunits. The basic formula is shown below:

wherein

-   -   T₁ is hydroxyl or a protected hydroxyl;     -   T₅ is hydrogen or a phosphate or phosphate derivative;     -   L₂ is a linking group; and     -   n is from 2 to about 50.

A further class of oligonucleotide mimetic is referred to as cyclohexenyl nucleic acids (CeNA). The furanose ring normally present in an DNA/RNA molecule is replaced with a cyclohenyl ring. CeNA DMT protected phosphoramidite monomers have been prepared and used for oligomeric compound synthesis following classical phosphoramidite chemistry. Fully modified CeNA oligomeric compounds and oligonucleotides having specific positions modified with CeNA have been prepared and studied (see Wang et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 8595-8602). In general the incorporation of CeNA monomers into a DNA chain increases its stability of a DNA/RNA hybrid. CeNA oligoadenylates formed complexes with RNA and DNA complements with similar stability to the native complexes. The study of incorporating CeNA structures into natural nucleic acid structures was shown by NMR and circular dichroism to proceed with easy conformational adaptation. Furthermore the incorporation of CeNA into a sequence targeting RNA was stable to serum and able to activate E. Coli RNase resulting in cleavage of the target RNA strand.

The general formula of CeNA is shown below:

wherein

-   -   each Bx is a heterocyclic base moiety;     -   T₁ is hydroxyl or a protected hydroxyl; and     -   T2 is hydroxyl or a protected hydroxyl.

Another class of oligonucleotide mimetic (anhydrohexitol nucleic acid) can be prepared from one or more anhydrohexitol nucleosides (see, Wouters and Herdewijn, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 1999, 9, 1563-1566) and would have the general formula:

A further preferred modification includes Locked Nucleic Acids (LNAs) in which the 2′-hydroxyl group is linked to the 4′ carbon atom of the sugar ring thereby forming a 2′-C,4′-C-oxymethylene linkage thereby forming a bicyclic sugar moiety (reviewed in Elayadi et al., Curr. Opinion Invens. Drugs, 2001, 2, 558-561; Braasch et al., Chem. Biol., 2001, 8 1-7; and Orum et al., Curr. Opinion Mol. Ther., 2001, 3, 239-243). The linkage is preferably a methylene (—CH₂—)_(n) group bridging the 2′ oxygen atom and the 4′ carbon atom wherein n is 1 or 2 (Singh et al., Chem. Commun., 1998, 4, 455-456). LNA and LNA analogs display very high duplex thermal stabilities with complementary DNA and RNA (Tm=+3 to +10 C), stability towards 3′-exonucleolytic degradation and good solubility properties. LNA's are commercially available from ProLigo (Paris, France and Boulder, Colo., USA). The basic structure of LNA showing the bicyclic ring system is shown below:

Another isomer of LNA that has also been studied is α-L-LNA which has been shown to have superior stability against a 3′-exonuclease (Frieden et al., Nucleic Acids Research, 2003, 21, 6365-6372). The α-L-LNA's were incorporated into antisense gapmers and chimeras that showed potent antisense activity. The structure of α-L-LNA is shown below:

The conformations of LNAs determined by 2D NMR spectroscopy have shown that the locked orientation of the LNA nucleotides, both in single-stranded LNA and in duplexes, constrains the phosphate backbone in such a way as to introduce a higher population of the N-type conformation (Petersen et al., J. Mol. Recognit., 2000, 13, 44-53). These conformations are associated with improved stacking of the nucleobases (Wengel et al., Nucleosides Nucleotides, 1999, 18, 1365-1370).

LNA has been shown to form exceedingly stable LNA:LNA duplexes (Koshkin et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 13252-13253). LNA:LNA hybridization was shown to be the most thermally stable nucleic acid type duplex system, and the RNA-mimicking character of LNA was established at the duplex level. Introduction of 3 LNA monomers (T or A) significantly increased melting points (Tm=+15/+11) toward DNA complements. The universality of LNA-mediated hybridization has been stressed by the formation of exceedingly stable LNA:LNA duplexes. The RNA-mimicking of LNA was reflected with regard to the N-type conformational restriction of the monomers and to the secondary structure of the LNA:RNA duplex.

LNAs also form duplexes with complementary DNA, RNA or LNA with high thermal affinities. Circular dichroism (CD) spectra show that duplexes involving fully modified LNA (esp. LNA:RNA) structurally resemble an A-form RNA:RNA duplex. Nuclear magnetic resonance (N) examination of an LNA:DNA duplex confirmed the 3′-endo conformation of an LNA monomer. Recognition of double-stranded DNA has also been demonstrated suggesting strand invasion by LNA. Studies of mismatched sequences show that LNAs obey the Watson-Crick base pairing rules with generally improved selectivity compared to the corresponding unmodified reference strands. DNA•LNA chimeras have been shown to efficiently inhibit gene expression when targeted to a variety of regions (5′-untranslated region, region of the start codon or coding region) within the luciferase mRNA (Braasch et al., Nucleic Acids Research, 2002, 30, 5160-5167).

Novel types of LNA-oligomeric compounds, as well as the LNAs, are useful in a wide range of diagnostic and therapeutic applications. Among these are antisense applications, PCR applications, strand-displacement oligomers, substrates for nucleic acid polymerases and generally as nucleotide based drugs.

Potent and nontoxic antisense oligonucleotides containing LNAs have been described (Wahlestedt et al., Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. U.S.A., 2000, 97, 5633-5638.) The authors have demonstrated that LNAs confer several desired properties to antisense agents. LNA/DNA copolymers were not degraded readily in blood serum and cell extracts. LNA/DNA copolymers exhibited potent antisense activity in assay systems as disparate as G-protein-coupled receptor signaling in living rat brain and detection of reporter genes in Escherichia coli. Lipofectin-mediated efficient delivery of LNA into living human breast cancer cells has also been accomplished. Further successful in vivo studies involving LNA's have shown knock-down of the rat delta opioid receptor without toxicity (Wahlestedt et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 2000, 97, 5633-5638) and in another study showed a blockage of the translation of the large subunit of RNA polymerase II (Fluiter et al., Nucleic Acids Res., 2003, 31, 953-962).

The synthesis and preparation of the LNA monomers adenine, cytosine, guanine, 5-methyl-cytosine, thymine and uracil, along with their oligomerization, and nucleic acid recognition properties have been described (Koshkin et al., Tetrahedron, 1998, 54, 3607-3630). LNAs and preparation thereof are also described in WO 98/39352 and WO 99/14226.

The first analogs of LNA, phosphorothioate-LNA and 2′-thio-LNAs, have also been prepared (Kumar et al., Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 1998, 8, 2219-2222). Preparation of locked nucleoside analogs containing oligodeoxyribonucleotide duplexes as substrates for nucleic acid polymerases has also been described (Wengel et al., PCT International Application WO 98-DK393 19980914). Furthermore, synthesis of 2′-amino-LNA, a novel conformationally restricted high-affinity oligonucleotide analog with a handle has been described in the art (Singh et al., J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63, 10035-10039). In addition, 2′-Amino- and 2′-methylamino-LNA's have been prepared and the thermal stability of their duplexes with complementary RNA and DNA strands has been previously reported.

Another oligonucleotide mimetic amenable to the present invention that has been prepared and studied is threose nucleic acid. This oligonucleotide mimetic is based on threose nucleosides instead of ribose nucleosides and has the general structure shown below:

Initial interest in (3′,2′)-α-L-threose nucleic acid (TNA) was directed to the question of whether a DNA polymerase existed that would copy the TNA. It was found that certain DNA polymerases are able to copy limited stretches of a TNA template (reported in C&EN/Jan. 13, 2003).

In another study it was determined that TNA is capable of antiparallel Watson-Crick base pairing with complementary DNA, RNA and TNA oligonucleotides (Chaput et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 856-857).

In one study (3′,2′)-α-L-threose nucleic acid was prepared and compared to the 2′ and 3′ amidate analogs (Wu et al., Organic Letters, 2002, 4(8), 1279-1282). The amidate analogs were shown to bind to RNA and DNA with comparable strength to that of RNA/DNA.

Further oligonucleotide mimetics have been prepared to include bicyclic and tricyclic nucleoside analogs having the formulas (amidite monomers shown):

(see Steffens et al., Helv. Chim. Acta, 1997, 80, 2426-2439; Steffens et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 3249-3255; Renneberg et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 5993-6002; and Renneberg et al., Nucleic acids res., 2002, 30, 2751-2757). These modified nucleoside analogs have been oligomerized using the phosphoramidite approach and the resulting oligomeric compounds containing tricyclic nucleoside analogs have shown increased thermal stabilities (Tm's) when hybridized to DNA, RNA and itself Oligomeric compounds containing bicyclic nucleoside analogs have shown thermal stabilities approaching that of DNA duplexes.

Another class of oligonucleotide mimetic is referred to as phosphonomonoester nucleic acids which incorporate a phosphorus group in the backbone. This class of olignucleotide mimetic is reported to have useful physical and biological and pharmacological properties in the areas of inhibiting gene expression (antisense oligonucleotides, ribozymes, sense oligonucleotides and triplex-forming oligonucleotides), as probes for the detection of nucleic acids and as auxiliaries for use in molecular biology.

The general formula (for definitions of Markush variables see: U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,874,553 and 6,127,346 herein incorporated by reference in their entirety) is shown below.

Further oligonucleotide mimetics amenable to the present invention have been prepared wherein a cyclobutyl ring replaces the naturally occurring furanosyl ring.

Modified Internucleoside Linkages

Specific examples of preferred antisense oligomeric compounds useful in this invention include oligonucleotides containing modified e.g. non-naturally occurring internucleoside linkages. As defined in this specification, oligonucleotides having modified internucleoside linkages include internucleoside linkages that retain a phosphorus atom and internucleoside linkages that do not have a phosphorus atom. For the purposes of this specification, and as sometimes referenced in the art, modified oligonucleotides that do not have a phosphorus atom in their internucleoside backbone can also be considered to be oligonucleosides.

In the C. elegans system, modification of the internucleotide linkage (phosphorothioate) did not significantly interfere with RNAi activity. Based on this observation, it is suggested that certain preferred oligomeric compounds of the invention can also have one or more modified internucleoside linkages. A preferred phosphorus containing modified internucleoside linkage is the phosphorothioate internucleoside linkage.

Preferred modified oligonucleotide backbones containing a phosphorus atom therein include, for example, phosphorothioates, chiral phosphorothioates, phosphorodithioates, phosphotriesters, aminoalkylphosphotriesters, methyl and other alkyl phosphonates including 3′-alkylene phosphonates, 5′-alkylene phosphonates and chiral phosphonates, phosphinates, phosphoramidates including 3′-amino phosphoramidate and aminoalkylphosphoramidates, thionophosphoramidates, thionoalkylphosphonates, thionoalkylphosphotriesters, phosphonoacetate and thiophosphonoacetate, selenophosphates and boranophosphates having normal 3′-5′ linkages, 2′-5′ linked analogs of these, and those having inverted polarity wherein one or more internucleotide linkages is a 3′ to 3′, 5′ to 5′ or 2′ to 2′ linkage. Preferred oligonucleotides having inverted polarity comprise a single 3′ to 3′ linkage at the 3′-most internucleotide linkage i.e. a single inverted nucleoside residue which may be abasic (the nucleobase is missing or has a hydroxyl group in place thereof). Various salts, mixed salts and free acid forms are also included.

N3′-P5′-phosphoramidates have been reported to exhibit both a high affinity towards a complementary RNA strand and nuclease resistance (Gryaznov et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1994, 116, 3143-3144). N3′-P5′-phosphoramidates have been studied with some success in vivo to specifically down regulate the expression of the c-myc gene (Skorski et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 1997, 94, 3966-3971; and Faira et al., Nat. Biotechnol., 2001, 19, 40-44).

Representative United States patents that teach the preparation of the above phosphorus-containing linkages include, but are not limited to, U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,687,808; 4,469,863; 4,476,301; 5,023,243; 5,177,196; 5,188,897; 5,264,423; 5,276,019; 5,278,302; 5,286,717; 5,321,131; 5,399,676; 5,405,939; 5,453,496; 5,455,233; 5,466,677; 5,476,925; 5,519,126; 5,536,821; 5,541,306; 5,550,111; 5,563,253; 5,571,799; 5,587,361; 5,194,599; 5,565,555; 5,527,899; 5,721,218; 5,672,697 and 5,625,050, certain of which are commonly owned with this application, and each of which is herein incorporated by reference.

In further embodiments of the invention, oligomeric compounds have one or more phosphorothioate and/or heteroatom internucleoside linkages, in particular —CH₂—NH—O—CH₂—, —CH₂—N(CH₃)—O—CH₂— [known as a methylene (methylimino) or MMI backbone], —CH₂—O—N(CH₃)—CH₂—, —CH₂—N(CH₃)—N(CH₃)—CH₂— and —O—N(CH₃)—CH₂—CH₂— [wherein the native phosphodiester internucleotide linkage is represented as —O—P(═O)(OH)—O—CH₂]. The MMI type internucleoside linkages are disclosed in the above referenced U.S. Pat. No. 5,489,677. Preferred amide internucleoside linkages are disclosed in the above referenced U.S. Pat. No. 5,602,240.

Preferred modified oligonucleotide backbones that do not include a phosphorus atom therein have backbones that are formed by short chain alkyl or cycloalkyl internucleoside linkages, mixed heteroatom and alkyl or cycloalkyl internucleoside linkages, or one or more short chain heteroatomic or heterocyclic internucleoside linkages. These include those having morpholino linkages (formed in part from the sugar portion of a nucleoside); siloxane backbones; sulfide, sulfoxide and sulfone backbones; formacetyl and thioformacetyl backbones; methylene formacetyl and thioformacetyl backbones; riboacetyl backbones; alkene containing backbones; sulfamate backbones; methyleneimino and methylenehydrazino backbones; sulfonate and sulfonamide backbones; amide backbones; and others having mixed N, O, S and CH₂ component parts.

Representative United States patents that teach the preparation of the above oligonucleosides include, but are not limited to, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,034,506; 5,166,315; 5,185,444; 5,214,134; 5,216,141; 5,235,033; 5,264,562; 5,264,564; 5,405,938; 5,434,257; 5,466,677; 5,470,967; 5,489,677; 5,541,307; 5,561,225; 5,596,086; 5,602,240; 5,610,289; 5,602,240; 5,608,046; 5,610,289; 5,618,704; 5,623,070; 5,663,312; 5,633,360; 5,677,437; 5,792,608; 5,646,269 and 5,677,439, certain of which are commonly owned with this application, and each of which is herein incorporated by reference.

Modified Sugars

Oligomeric compounds of the invention may also contain one or more substituted sugar moieties. Preferred oligomeric compounds comprise a sugar substituent group selected from: OH; F; O—, S—, or N-alkyl; O—, S—, or N-alkenyl; O—, S— or N-alkynyl; or O-alkyl-O-alkyl, wherein the alkyl, alkenyl and alkynyl may be substituted or unsubstituted C₁ to C₁₀ alkyl or C₂ to C₁₀ alkenyl and alkynyl. Particularly preferred are O[(CH₂)_(n)O]_(m)CH₃, O(CH₂)_(n)OCH₃, O(CH₂)_(n)NH₂, O(CH₂)_(n)CH₃, O(CH₂)_(n)ONH₂, and O(CH₂)_(n)ON[(CH₂)_(n)CH₃]₂, where n and m are from 1 to about 10. Other preferred oligonucleotides comprise a sugar substituent group selected from: C₁ to C₁₀ lower alkyl, substituted lower alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, alkaryl, aralkyl, O-alkaryl or O-aralkyl, SH, SCH₃, OCN, Cl, Br, CN, CF₃, OCF₃, SOCH₃, SO₂CH₃, ONO₂, NO₂, N₃, NH₂, heterocycloalkyl, heterocycloalkaryl, aminoalkylamino, polyalkylamino, substituted silyl, an RNA cleaving group, a reporter group, an intercalator, a group for improving the pharmacokinetic properties of an oligonucleotide, or a group for improving the pharmacodynamic properties of an oligonucleotide, and other substituents having similar properties. A preferred modification includes 2′-methoxyethoxy (2′-O—CH₂CH₂OCH₃, also known as 2′-O-(2-methoxyethyl) or 2′-MOE) (Martin et al., Helv. Chim. Acta, 1995, 78, 486-504) i.e., an alkoxyalkoxy group. A further preferred modification includes 2′-dimethylaminooxyethoxy, i.e., a O(CH₂)₂ON(CH₃)₂ group, also known as 2′-DMAOE, as described in examples hereinbelow, and 2′-dimethylaminoethoxyethoxy (also known in the art as 2′-O-dimethyl-amino-ethoxy-ethyl or 2′-DMAEOE), i.e., 2′-O—CH2OCH₂N(CH₃)₂.

Other preferred sugar substituent groups include methoxy (—O—CH₃), aminopropoxy (—OCH₂CH₂CH₂NH₂), allyl (—CH₂—CH═CH₂), —O-allyl (—O—CH₂—CH═CH₂) and fluoro (F). 2′-Sugar substituent groups may be in the arabino (up) position or ribo (down) position. A preferred 2′-arabino modification is 2′-F (see: Loc et al., Biochemistry, 2002, 41, 3457-3467). Similar modifications may also be made at other positions on the oligomeric compound, particularly the 3′ position of the sugar on the 3′ terminal nucleoside or in 2′-5′ linked oligonucleotides and the 5′ position of 5′ terminal nucleotide. Oligomeric compounds may also have sugar mimetics such as cyclobutyl moieties in place of the pentofuranosyl sugar. Representative United States patents that teach the preparation of such modified sugar structures include, but are not limited to, U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,981,957; 5,118,800; 5,319,080; 5,359,044; 5,393,878; 5,446,137; 5,466,786; 5,514,785; 5,519,134; 5,567,811; 5,576,427; 5,591,722; 5,597,909; 5,610,300; 5,627,053; 5,639,873; 5,646,265; 5,658,873; 5,670,633; 5,792,747; and 5,700,920, certain of which are commonly owned with the instant application, and each of which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.

Further representative sugar substituent groups include groups of formula I_(a) or II_(a):

wherein:

-   -   R_(b) is O, S or NH;     -   R_(d) is a single bond, O, S or C(═O);     -   R_(e) is C₁-C₁₀ alkyl, N(R_(k))(R_(m)), N(R_(k))(R_(n)),         N═C(R_(p))(R_(q)), N═C(R_(p))(R_(r)) or has formula III_(a);

-   -   R_(p) and R_(q) are each independently hydrogen or C₁-C₁₀ alkyl;     -   R_(r) is —R_(x)—R_(y);     -   each R_(s), R_(t), R_(u) and R_(v) is, independently, hydrogen,         C(O)R_(w), substituted or unsubstituted C₁-C₁₀ alkyl,         substituted or unsubstituted C₂-C₁₀ alkenyl, substituted or         unsubstituted C₂-C₁₀ alkynyl, alkylsulfonyl, arylsulfonyl, a         chemical functional group or a conjugate group, wherein the         substituent groups are selected from hydroxyl, amino, alkoxy,         carboxy, benzyl, phenyl, nitro, thiol, thioalkoxy, halogen,         alkyl, aryl, alkenyl and alkynyl;     -   or optionally, R_(u) and R_(v), together form a phthalimido         moiety with the nitrogen atom to which they are attached;     -   each R_(w) is, independently, substituted or unsubstituted         C₁-C₁₀ alkyl, trifluoromethyl, cyanoethyloxy, methoxy, ethoxy,         t-butoxy, allyloxy, 9-fluorenylmethoxy,         2-(trimethylsilyl)-ethoxy, 2,2,2-trichloroethoxy, benzyloxy,         butyryl, iso-butyryl, phenyl or aryl;     -   R_(k) is hydrogen, a nitrogen protecting group or —R_(x)—R_(y);     -   R_(p) is hydrogen, a nitrogen protecting group or —R_(x)—R_(y);     -   R_(x) is a bond or a linking moiety;     -   R_(y) is a chemical functional group, a conjugate group or a         solid support medium;     -   each R_(m) and R_(n) is, independently, H, a nitrogen protecting         group, substituted or unsubstituted C₁-C₁₀ alkyl, substituted or         unsubstituted C₂-C₁₀ alkenyl, substituted or unsubstituted         C₂-C₁₀ alkynyl, wherein the substituent groups are selected from         hydroxyl, amino, alkoxy, carboxy, benzyl, phenyl, nitro, thiol,         thioalkoxy, halogen, alkyl, aryl, alkenyl, alkynyl; NH₃ ⁺,         N(R_(u))(R_(v)), guanidino and acyl where said acyl is an acid         amide or an ester;     -   or R_(m) and R_(n), together, are a nitrogen protecting group,         are joined in a ring structure that optionally includes an         additional heteroatom selected from N and O or are a chemical         functional group;     -   R_(i) is OR_(z), SR_(z), or N(R_(z))₂;     -   each R_(z) is, independently, H, C₁-C₈ alkyl, C₁-C₈ haloalkyl,         C(═NH)N(H)R_(u), C(═O)N(H)R_(u) or OC(═O)N(H)R_(u);     -   R_(f), R_(g) and R_(h) comprise a ring system having from about         4 to about 7 carbon atoms or having from about 3 to about 6         carbon atoms and 1 or 2 heteroatoms wherein said heteroatoms are         selected from oxygen, nitrogen and sulfur and wherein said ring         system is aliphatic, unsaturated aliphatic, aromatic, or         saturated or unsaturated heterocyclic;     -   R_(j) is alkyl or haloalkyl having 1 to about 10 carbon atoms,         alkenyl having 2 to about 10 carbon atoms, alkynyl having 2 to         about 10 carbon atoms, aryl having 6 to about 14 carbon atoms,         N(R_(k))(R_(m)) OR_(k), halo, SR_(k) or CN;     -   m_(a) is 1 to about 10;     -   each mb is, independently, 0 or 1;     -   mc is 0 or an integer from 1 to 10;     -   md is an integer from 1 to 10;     -   me is from 0, 1 or 2; and     -   provided that when mc is 0, md is greater than 1.

Representative substituents groups of Formula I are disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/130,973, filed Aug. 7, 1998, entitled “Capped 2′-Oxyethoxy Oligonucleotides,” hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

Representative cyclic substituent groups of Formula II are disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/123,108, filed Jul. 27, 1998, entitled “RNA Targeted 2′-Oligomeric compounds that are Conformationally Preorganized,” hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

Particularly preferred sugar substituent groups include O[(CH₂)_(n)O]_(m)CH₃, O(CH₂)_(n)OCH₃, O(CH₂)_(n)NH₂, O(CH₂)_(n)CH₃, O(CH₂)_(n)ONH₂, and O(CH₂)_(n)ON[(CH₂)_(n)CH₃)]₂, where n and m are from 1 to about 10.

Representative guanidino substituent groups that are shown in formula III and IV are disclosed in co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/349,040, entitled “Functionalized Oligomers”, filed Jul. 7, 1999, hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

Representative acetamido substituent groups are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,147,200 which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

Representative dimethylaminoethyloxyethyl substituent groups are disclosed in International Patent Application PCT/US99/17895, entitled “2′-O-Dimethylaminoethyloxyethyl-Oligomeric compounds”, filed Aug. 6, 1999, hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

Modified Nucleobases/Naturally Occurring Nucleobases

Oligomeric compounds may also include nucleobase (often referred to in the art simply as “base” or “heterocyclic base moiety”) modifications or substitutions. As used herein, “unmodified” or “natural” nucleobases include the purine bases adenine (A) and guanine (G), and the pyrimidine bases thymine (T), cytosine (C) and uracil (U). Modified nucleobases also referred herein as heterocyclic base moieties include other synthetic and natural nucleobases such as 5-methylcytosine (5-me-C), 5-hydroxymethyl cytosine, xanthine, hypoxanthine, 2-aminoadenine, 6-methyl and other alkyl derivatives of adenine and guanine, 2-propyl and other alkyl derivatives of adenine and guanine, 2-thiouracil, 2-thiothymine and 2-thiocytosine, 5-halouracil and cytosine, 5-propynyl (—C≡C—CH₃) uracil and cytosine and other alkynyl derivatives of pyrimidine bases, 6-azo uracil, cytosine and thymine, 5-uracil (pseudouracil), 4-thiouracil, 8-halo, 8-amino, 8-thiol, 8-thioalkyl, 8-hydroxyl and other 8-substituted adenines and guanines, 5-halo particularly 5-bromo, 5-trifluoromethyl and other 5-substituted uracils and cytosines, 7-methylguanine and 7-methyladenine, 2-F-adenine, 2-amino-adenine, 8-azaguanine and 8-azaadenine, 7-deazaguanine and 7-deazaadenine and 3-deazaguanine and 3-deazaadenine.

Heterocyclic base moieties may also include those in which the purine or pyrimidine base is replaced with other heterocycles, for example 7-deaza-adenine, 7-deazaguanosine, 2-aminopyridine and 2-pyridone. Further nucleobases include those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,687,808, those disclosed in The Concise Encyclopedia Of Polymer Science And Engineering, pages 858-859, Kroschwitz, J. I., ed. John Wiley & Sons, 1990, those disclosed by Englisch et al., Angewandte Chemie, International Edition, 1991, 30, 613, and those disclosed by Sanghvi, Y. S., Chapter 15, Antisense Research and Applications, pages 289-302, Crooke, S. T. and Lebleu, B., ed., CRC Press, 1993. Certain of these nucleobases are particularly useful for increasing the binding affinity of the oligomeric compounds of the invention. These include 5-substituted pyrimidines, 6-azapyrimidines and N-2, N-6 and O-6 substituted purines, including 2-aminopropyladenine, 5-propynyluracil and 5-propynylcytosine. 5-methylcytosine substitutions have been shown to increase nucleic acid duplex stability by 0.6-1.2° C. (Sanghvi, Y. S., Crooke, S T. and Lebleu, B., eds., Antisense Research and Applications, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1993, pp. 276-278) and are presently preferred base substitutions, even more particularly when combined with 2′-O-methoxyethyl sugar modifications.

Oligomeric compounds of the present invention can also include polycyclic heterocyclic compounds in place of one or more heterocyclic base moieties. A number of tricyclic heterocyclic compounds have been previously reported. These compounds are routinely used in antisense applications to increase the binding properties of the modified strand to a target strand. The most studied modifications are targeted to guanosines hence they have been termed G-clamps or cytidine analogs. Many of these polycyclic heterocyclic compounds have the general formula:

Representative cytosine analogs that make 3 hydrogen bonds with a guanosine in a second strand include 1,3-diazaphenoxazine-2-one (R₁₀=O, R₁₁-R₁₄=H) [Kurchavov, et al., Nucleosides and nucleotides, 1997, 16, 1837-1846], 1,3-diazaphenothiazine-2-one (R₁₀=S, R₁₁-R₁₄=H), [Lin, K.-Y.; Jones, R. J.; Matteucci, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 3873-3874] and 6,7,8,9-tetrafluoro-1,3-diazaphenoxazine-2-one (R₁₀=O, R₁₁-R₁₄=F) [Wang, J.; Lin, K.-Y., Matteucci, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 8385-8388]. Incorporated into oligonucleotides these base modifications were shown to hybridize with complementary guanine and the latter was also shown to hybridize with adenine and to enhance helical thermal stability by extended stacking interactions (also see U.S. patent application entitled “Modified Peptide Nucleic Acids” filed May 24, 2002, Ser. No. 10/155,920; and U.S. patent application entitled “Nuclease Resistant Chimeric Oligonucleotides” filed May 24, 2002, Ser. No. 10/013,295, both of which are commonly owned with this application and are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety).

Further helix-stabilizing properties have been observed when a cytosine analog/substitute has an aminoethoxy moiety attached to the rigid 1,3-diazaphenoxazine-2-one scaffold (R₁₀=O, R₁₁=—O—(CH₂)₂—NH₂, R₁₂₋₁₄=H) [Lin, K.-Y.; Matteucci, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 8531-8532]. Binding studies demonstrated that a single incorporation could enhance the binding affinity of a model oligonucleotide to its complementary target DNA or RNA with a ΔT_(m) of up to 18° relative to 5-methyl cytosine (dC5^(me)), which is the highest known affinity enhancement for a single modification, yet. On the other hand, the gain in helical stability does not compromise the specificity of the oligonucleotides. The T_(m) data indicate an even greater discrimination between the perfect match and mismatched sequences compared to dC5^(me). It was suggested that the tethered amino group serves as an additional hydrogen bond donor to interact with the Hoogsteen face, namely the O6, of a complementary guanine thereby forming 4 hydrogen bonds. This means that the increased affinity of G-clamp is mediated by the combination of extended base stacking and additional specific hydrogen bonding.

Further tricyclic heterocyclic compounds and methods of using them that are amenable to the present invention are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,028,183, which issued on May 22, 2000, and U.S. Pat. No. 6,007,992, which issued on Dec. 28, 1999, the contents of both are commonly assigned with this application and are incorporated herein in their entirety.

The enhanced binding affinity of the phenoxazine derivatives together with their uncompromised sequence specificity makes them valuable nucleobase analogs for the development of more potent antisense-based drugs. In fact, promising data have been derived from in vitro experiments demonstrating that heptanucleotides containing phenoxazine substitutions are capable to activate RNaseH, enhance cellular uptake and exhibit an increased antisense activity [Lin, K-Y; Matteucci, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 8531-8532]. The activity enhancement was even more pronounced in case of G-clamp, as a single substitution was shown to significantly improve the in vitro potency of a 20 mer 2′-deoxyphosphorothioate oligonucleotides [Flanagan, W. M.; Wolf, J. J.; Olson, P.; Grant, D.; Lin, K.-Y.; Wagner, R. W.; Matteucci, M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1999, 96, 3513-3518]. Nevertheless, to optimize oligonucleotide design and to better understand the impact of these heterocyclic modifications on the biological activity, it is important to evaluate their effect on the nuclease stability of the oligomers.

Further modified polycyclic heterocyclic compounds useful as heterocyclcic bases are disclosed in but not limited to, the above noted U.S. Pat. No. 3,687,808, as well as U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,845,205; 5,130,302; 5,134,066; 5,175,273; 5,367,066; 5,432,272; 5,434,257; 5,457,187; 5,459,255; 5,484,908; 5,502,177; 5,525,711; 5,552,540; 5,587,469; 5,594,121, 5,596,091; 5,614,617; 5,645,985; 5,646,269; 5,750,692; 5,830,653; 5,763,588; 6,005,096; and 5,681,941, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/996,292 filed Nov. 28, 2001, certain of which are commonly owned with the instant application, and each of which is herein incorporated by reference.

Conjugates

Oligomeric compounds used in the compositions of the present invention can also be modified to have one or more moieties or conjugates for enhancing the activity, cellular distribution or cellular uptake of the resulting oligomeric compounds. In one embodiment such modified oligomeric compounds are prepared by covalently attaching conjugate groups to functional groups such as hydroxyl or amino groups. Conjugate groups of the invention include intercalators, reporter molecules, polyamines, polyamides, polyethylene glycols, polyethers, groups that enhance the pharmacodynamic properties of oligomers, and groups that enhance the pharmacokinetic properties of oligomers. Typical conjugates groups include cholesterols, lipids, phospholipids, biotin, phenazine, folate, phenanthridine, anthraquinone, acridine, fluoresceins, rhodamines, coumarins, and dyes. Groups that enhance the pharmacodynamic properties, in the context of this invention, include groups that improve oligomer uptake, enhance oligomer resistance to degradation, and/or strengthen sequence-specific hybridization with RNA. Groups that enhance the pharmacokinetic properties, in the context of this invention, include groups that improve oligomer uptake, distribution, metabolism or excretion. Representative conjugate groups are disclosed in International Patent Application PCT/US92/09196, filed Oct. 23, 1992 the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.

Conjugate moieties include but are not limited to lipid moieties such as a cholesterol moiety (Letsinger et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1989, 86, 6553-6556), cholic acid (Manoharan et al., Bioorg. Med. Chem. Let., 1994, 4, 1053-1060), a thioether, e.g., hexyl-S-tritylthiol (Manoharan et al., Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 1992, 660, 306-309; Manoharan et al., Bioorg. Med. Chem. Let., 1993, 3, 2765-2770), a thiocholesterol (Oberhauser et al., Nucl. Acids Res., 1992, 20, 533-538), an aliphatic chain, e.g., dodecandiol or undecyl residues (Saison-Behmoaras et al., EMBO J., 1991, 10, 1111-1118; Kabanov et al., FEBS Lett., 1990, 259, 327-330; Svinarchuk et al., Biochimie, 1993, 75, 49-54), a phospholipid, e.g., di-hexadecyl-rac-glycerol or triethylammonium 1,2-di-O-hexadecyl-rac-glycero-3-H-phosphonate (Manoharan et al., Tetrahedron Lett., 1995, 36, 3651-3654; Shea et al., Nucl. Acids Res., 1990, 18, 3777-3783), a polyamine or a polyethylene glycol chain (Manoharan et al., Nucleosides & Nucleotides, 1995, 14, 969-973), or adamantane acetic acid (Manoharan et al., Tetrahedron Lett., 1995, 36, 3651-3654), a palmityl moiety (Mishra et al., Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1995, 1264, 229-237), or an octadecylamine or hexylamino-carbonyl-oxycholesterol moiety (Crooke et al., J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 1996, 277, 923-937.

The oligomeric compounds of the invention may also be conjugated to active drug substances, for example, aspirin, warfarin, phenylbutazone, ibuprofen, suprofen, fenbufen, ketoprofen, (S)-(+)-pranoprofen, carprofen, dansylsarcosine, 2,3,5-triiodobenzoic acid, flufenamic acid, folinic acid, a benzothiadiazide, chlorothiazide, a diazepine, indomethicin, a barbiturate, a cephalosporin, a sulfa drug, an antidiabetic, an antibacterial or an antibiotic. Oligonucleotide-drug conjugates and their preparation are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/334,130 (filed Jun. 15, 1999) which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

Representative United States patents that teach the preparation of such oligonucleotide conjugates include, but are not limited to, U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,828,979; 4,948,882; 5,218,105; 5,525,465; 5,541,313; 5,545,730; 5,552,538; 5,578,717, 5,580,731; 5,580,731; 5,591,584; 5,109,124; 5,118,802; 5,138,045; 5,414,077; 5,486,603; 5,512,439; 5,578,718; 5,608,046; 4,587,044; 4,605,735; 4,667,025; 4,762,779; 4,789,737; 4,824,941; 4,835,263; 4,876,335; 4,904,582; 4,958,013; 5,082,830; 5,112,963; 5,214,136; 5,082,830; 5,112,963; 5,214,136; 5,245,022; 5,254,469; 5,258,506; 5,262,536; 5,272,250; 5,292,873; 5,317,098; 5,371,241, 5,391,723; 5,416,203, 5,451,463; 5,510,475; 5,512,667; 5,514,785; 5,565,552; 5,567,810; 5,574,142; 5,585,481; 5,587,371; 5,595,726; 5,597,696; 5,599,923; 5,599,928 and 5,688,941, certain of which are commonly owned with the instant application, and each of which is herein incorporated by reference.

Oligomeric compounds used in the compositions of the present invention can also be modified to have one or more stabilizing groups that are generally attached to one or both termini of oligomeric compounds to enhance properties such as for example nuclease stability. Included in stabilizing groups are cap structures. By “cap structure or terminal cap moiety” is meant chemical modifications, which have been incorporated at either terminus of oligonucleotides (see for example Wincott et al., WO 97/26270, incorporated by reference herein). These terminal modifications protect the oligomeric compounds having terminal nucleic acid molecules from exonuclease degradation, and can help in delivery and/or localization within a cell. The cap can be present at the 5′-terminus (5′-cap) or at the 3′-terminus (3′-cap) or can be present on both termini. In non-limiting examples, the 5′-cap includes inverted abasic residue (moiety), 4′,5′-methylene nucleotide; 1-(beta-D-erythrofuranosyl)nucleotide, 4′-thio nucleotide, carbocyclic nucleotide; 1,5-anhydrohexitol nucleotide; L-nucleotides; alpha-nucleotides; modified base nucleotide; phosphorodithioate linkage; threo-pentofuranosyl nucleotide; acyclic 3′,4′-seco nucleotide; acyclic 3,4-dihydroxybutyl nucleotide; acyclic 3,5-dihydroxypentyl nucleotide, 3′-3′-inverted nucleotide moiety; 3′-3′-inverted abasic moiety; 3′-2′-inverted nucleotide moiety; 3′-2′-inverted abasic moiety; 1,4-butanediol phosphate; 3′-phosphoramidate; hexylphosphate; aminohexyl phosphate; 3′-phosphate; 3′-phosphorothioate; phosphorodithioate; or bridging or non-bridging methylphosphonate moiety (for more details see Wincott et al., International PCT publication No. WO 97/26270, incorporated by reference herein).

Further 3′-cap structures of the present invention include, for example 4′,5′-methylene nucleotide; 1-(beta-D-erythrofuranosyl)nucleotide; 4′-thio nucleotide, carbocyclic nucleotide; 5′-amino-alkyl phosphate; 1,3-diamino-2-propyl phosphate, 3-aminopropyl phosphate; 6-aminohexyl phosphate; 1,2-aminododecyl phosphate; hydroxypropyl phosphate; 1,5-anhydrohexitol nucleotide; L-nucleotide; alpha-nucleotide; modified base nucleotide; phosphorodithioate; threo-pentofuranosyl nucleotide; acyclic 3′,4′-seco nucleotide; 3,4-dihydroxybutyl nucleotide; 3,5-dihydroxypentyl nucleotide, 5′-5′-inverted nucleotide moiety; 5′-5′-inverted abasic moiety; 5′-phosphoramidate; 5′-phosphorothioate; 1,4-butanediol phosphate; 5′-amino; bridging and/or non-bridging 5′-phosphoramidate, phosphorothioate and/or phosphorodithioate, bridging or non bridging methylphosphonate and 5′-mercapto moieties (for more details see Beaucage and Tyer, 1993, Tetrahedron 49, 1925; incorporated by reference herein).

Further 3′ and 5′-stabilizing groups that can be used to cap one or both ends of an oligomeric compound to impart nuclease stability include those disclosed in WO 03/004602 published on Jan. 16, 2003.

3′-Endo Modifications

In one aspect of the present invention oligomeric compounds include nucleosides synthetically modified to induce a 3′-endo sugar conformation. A nucleoside can incorporate synthetic modifications of the heterocyclic base, the sugar moiety or both to induce a desired 3′-endo sugar conformation. These modified nucleosides are used to mimic RNA like nucleosides so that particular properties of an oligomeric compound can be enhanced while maintaining the desirable 3′-endo conformational geometry. There is an apparent preference for an RNA type duplex (A form helix, predominantly 3′-endo) as a requirement (e.g. trigger) of RNA interference which is supported in part by the fact that duplexes composed of 2′-deoxy-2′-F-nucleosides appears efficient in triggering RNAi response in the C. elegans system. Properties that are enhanced by using more stable 3′-endo nucleosides include but aren't limited to modulation of pharmacokinetic properties through modification of protein binding, protein off-rate, absorption and clearance; modulation of nuclease stability as well as chemical stability; modulation of the binding affinity and specificity of the oligomer (affinity and specificity for enzymes as well as for complementary sequences); and increasing efficacy of RNA cleavage. The present invention provides oligomeric triggers of RNAi having one or more nucleosides modified in such a way as to favor a C3′-endo type conformation.

Nucleoside conformation is influenced by various factors including substitution at the 2′, 3′ or 4′-positions of the pentofuranosyl sugar. Electronegative substituents generally prefer the axial positions, while sterically demanding substituents generally prefer the equatorial positions (Principles of Nucleic Acid Structure, Wolfgang Sanger, 1984, Springer-Verlag.) Modification of the 2′ position to favor the 3′-endo conformation can be achieved while maintaining the 2′-OH as a recognition element, as illustrated in FIG. 2, below (Gallo et al., Tetrahedron (2001), 57, 5707-5713. Harry-O'kuru et al., J. Org. Chem., (1997), 62(6), 1754-1759 and Tang et al., J. Org. Chem. (1999), 64, 747-754.) Alternatively, preference for the 3′-endo conformation can be achieved by deletion of the 2′-OH as exemplified by 2′deoxy-2′F-nucleosides (Kawasaki et al., J. Med. Chem. (1993), 36, 831-841), which adopts the 3′-endo conformation positioning the electronegative fluorine atom in the axial position. Other modifications of the ribose ring, for example substitution at the 4′-position to give 4′-F modified nucleosides (Guillerm et al., Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters (1995), 5, 1455-1460 and Owen et al., J. Org. Chem. (1976), 41, 3010-3017), or for example modification to yield methanocarba nucleoside analogs (Jacobson et al., J. Med. Chem. Lett. (2000), 43, 2196-2203 and Lee et al., Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters (2001), 11, 1333-1337) also induce preference for the 3′-endo conformation. Along similar lines, oligomeric triggers of RNAi response might be composed of one or more nucleosides modified in such a way that conformation is locked into a C3′-endo type conformation, i.e. Locked Nucleic Acid (LNA, Singh et al, Chem. Commun. (1998), 4, 455-456), and ethylene bridged Nucleic Acids (ENA, Morita et al, Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters (2002), 12, 73-76.) Examples of modified nucleosides amenable to the present invention are shown below in Table I. These examples are meant to be representative and not exhaustive.

TABLE I

The preferred conformation of modified nucleosides and their oligomers can be estimated by various methods such as molecular dynamics calculations, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and CD measurements. Hence, modifications predicted to induce RNA like conformations, A-form duplex geometry in an oligomeric context, are selected for use in the modified oligonucleotides of the present invention. The synthesis of numerous of the modified nucleosides amenable to the present invention are known in the art (see for example, Chemistry of Nucleosides and Nucleotides Vol 1-3, ed. Leroy B. Townsend, 1988, Plenum press., and the examples section below.)

In one aspect, the present invention is directed to oligomers that are prepared having enhanced properties compared to native RNA against nucleic acid targets. A target is identified and an oligomer is selected having an effective length and sequence that is complementary to a portion of the target sequence. Each nucleoside of the selected sequence is scrutinized for possible enhancing modifications. A preferred modification would be the replacement of one or more RNA nucleosides with nucleosides that have the same 3′-endo conformational geometry. Such modifications can enhance chemical and nuclease stability relative to native RNA while at the same time being much cheaper and easier to synthesize and/or incorporate into an oligonucleotide. The selected sequence can be further divided into regions and the nucleosides of each region evaluated for enhancing modifications that can be the result of a chimeric configuration. Consideration is also given to the 5′ and 3′-termini as there are often advantageous modifications that can be made to one or more of the terminal nucleosides. The oligomeric compounds of the present invention include at least one 5′-modified phosphate group on a single strand or on at least one 5′-position of a double stranded sequence or sequences. Further modifications are also considered such as internucleoside linkages, conjugate groups, substitute sugars or bases, substitution of one or more nucleosides with nucleoside mimetics and any other modification that can enhance the selected sequence for its intended target.

The terms used to describe the conformational geometry of homoduplex nucleic acids are “A Form” for RNA and “B Form” for DNA. The respective conformational geometry for RNA and DNA duplexes was determined from X-ray diffraction analysis of nucleic acid fibers (Arnott and Hukins, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm., 1970, 47, 1504.) In general, RNA:RNA duplexes are more stable and have higher melting temperatures (Tm's) than DNA:DNA duplexes (Sanger et al., Principles of Nucleic Acid Structure, 1984, Springer-Verlag; New York, N.Y.; Lesnik et al., Biochemistry, 1995, 34, 10807-10815; Conte et al., Nucleic Acids Res., 1997, 25, 2627-2634). The increased stability of RNA has been attributed to several structural features, most notably the improved base stacking interactions that result from an A-form geometry (Searle et al., Nucleic Acids Res., 1993, 21, 2051-2056). The presence of the 2′ hydroxyl in RNA biases the sugar toward a C3′ endo pucker, i.e., also designated as Northern pucker, which causes the duplex to favor the A-form geometry. In addition, the 2′ hydroxyl groups of RNA can form a network of water mediated hydrogen bonds that help stabilize the RNA duplex (Egli et al., Biochemistry, 1996, 35, 8489-8494). On the other hand, deoxy nucleic acids prefer a C2′ endo sugar pucker, i.e., also known as Southern pucker, which is thought to impart a less stable B-form geometry (Sanger, W. (1984) Principles of Nucleic Acid Structure, Springer-Verlag, New York, N.Y.). As used herein, B-form geometry is inclusive of both C2′-endo pucker and O4′-endo pucker. This is consistent with Berger, et. al., Nucleic Acids Research, 1998, 26, 2473-2480, who pointed out that in considering the furanose conformations which give rise to B-form duplexes consideration should also be given to a O4′-endo pucker contribution.

DNA:RNA hybrid duplexes, however, are usually less stable than pure RNA:RNA duplexes, and depending on their sequence may be either more or less stable than DNA:DNA duplexes (Searle et al., Nucleic Acids Res., 1993, 21, 2051-2056). The structure of a hybrid duplex is intermediate between A- and B-form geometries, which may result in poor stacking interactions (Lane et al., Eur. J. Biochem., 1993, 215, 297-306; Fedoroff et al., J. Mol. Biol., 1993, 233, 509-523; Gonzalez et al., Biochemistry, 1995, 34, 4969-4982; Horton et al., J. Mol. Biol., 1996, 264, 521-533). The stability of the duplex formed between a target RNA and a synthetic sequence is central to therapies such as but not limited to antisense and RNA interference as these mechanisms require the binding of a synthetic oligomer strand to an RNA target strand. In the case of antisense, effective inhibition of the mRNA requires that the antisense DNA have a very high binding affinity with the mRNA. Otherwise the desired interaction between the synthetic oligomer strand and target mRNA strand will occur infrequently, resulting in decreased efficacy.

One routinely used method of modifying the sugar puckering is the substitution of the sugar at the 2′-position with a substituent group that influences the sugar geometry. The influence on ring conformation is dependant on the nature of the substituent at the 2′-position. A number of different substituents have been studied to determine their sugar puckering effect. For example, 2′-halogens have been studied showing that the 2′-fluoro derivative exhibits the largest population (65%) of the C3′-endo form, and the 2′-iodo exhibits the lowest population (7%). The populations of adenosine (2′-OH) versus deoxyadenosine (2′-H) are 36% and 19%, respectively. Furthermore, the effect of the 2′-fluoro group of adenosine dimers (2′-deoxy-2′-fluoroadenosine-2′-deoxy-2′-fluoro-adenosine) is further correlated to the stabilization of the stacked conformation.

As expected, the relative duplex stability can be enhanced by replacement of 2′-OH groups with 2′-F groups thereby increasing the C3′-endo population. It is assumed that the highly polar nature of the 2′-F bond and the extreme preference for C3′-endo puckering may stabilize the stacked conformation in an A-form duplex. Data from UV hypochromicity, circular dichroism, and ¹H NMR also indicate that the degree of stacking decreases as the electronegativity of the halo substituent decreases. Furthermore, steric bulk at the 2′-position of the sugar moiety is better accommodated in an A-form duplex than a B-form duplex. Thus, a 2′-substituent on the 3′-terminus of a dinucleoside monophosphate is thought to exert a number of effects on the stacking conformation: steric repulsion, furanose puckering preference, electrostatic repulsion, hydrophobic attraction, and hydrogen bonding capabilities. These substituent effects are thought to be determined by the molecular size, electronegativity, and hydrophobicity of the substituent. Melting temperatures of complementary strands is also increased with the 2′-substituted adenosine diphosphates. It is not clear whether the 3′-endo preference of the conformation or the presence of the substituent is responsible for the increased binding. However, greater overlap of adjacent bases (stacking) can be achieved with the 3′-endo conformation.

One synthetic 2′-modification that imparts increased nuclease resistance and a very high binding affinity to nucleotides is the 2-methoxyethoxy (2′-MOE, 2′-OCH₂CH₂OCH₃) side chain (Baker et al., J. Biol. Chem., 1997, 272, 11944-12000). One of the immediate advantages of the 2′-MOE substitution is the improvement in binding affinity, which is greater than many similar 2′ modifications such as O-methyl, O-propyl, and O-aminopropyl. Oligomers having the 2′-O-methoxyethyl substituent also have been shown to be antisense inhibitors of gene expression with promising features for in vivo use (Martin, P., Helv. Chim. Acta, 1995, 78, 486-504; Altmann et al., Chimia, 1996, 50, 168-176; Altmann et al., Biochem. Soc. Trans., 1996, 24, 630-637; and Altmann et al., Nucleosides Nucleotides, 1997, 16, 917-926). Relative to DNA, the oligomers having the 2′-MOE modification displayed improved RNA affinity and higher nuclease resistance. Chimeric oligomers having 2′-MOE substituents in the wing nucleosides and an internal region of deoxy-phosphorothioate nucleotides (also termed a gapped oligomer or gapmer) have shown effective reduction in the growth of tumors in animal models at low doses. 2′-MOE substituted oligomers have also shown outstanding promise as antisense agents in several disease states. One such MOE substituted oligomer is presently being investigated in clinical trials for the treatment of CMV retinitis.

Chemistries Defined

Unless otherwise defined herein, alkyl means C₁-C₁₂, preferably C₁-C₈, and more preferably C₁-C₆, straight or (where possible) branched chain aliphatic hydrocarbyl.

Unless otherwise defined herein, heteroalkyl means C₁-C₁₂, preferably C₁-C₈, and more preferably C₁-C₆, straight or (where possible) branched chain aliphatic hydrocarbyl containing at least one, and preferably about 1 to about 3, hetero atoms in the chain, including the terminal portion of the chain. Preferred heteroatoms include N, O and S.

Unless otherwise defined herein, cycloalkyl means C₃-C₁₂, preferably C₃-C₈, and more preferably C₃-C₆, aliphatic hydrocarbyl ring.

Unless otherwise defined herein, alkenyl means C₂-C₁₂, preferably C₂-C₈, and more preferably C₂-C₆ alkenyl, which may be straight or (where possible) branched hydrocarbyl moiety, which contains at least one carbon-carbon double bond.

Unless otherwise defined herein, alkynyl means C₂-C₁₂, preferably C₂-C₈, and more preferably C₂-C₆ alkynyl, which may be straight or (where possible) branched hydrocarbyl moiety, which contains at least one carbon-carbon triple bond.

Unless otherwise defined herein, heterocycloalkyl means a ring moiety containing at least three ring members, at least one of which is carbon, and of which 1, 2 or three ring members are other than carbon. Preferably the number of carbon atoms varies from 1 to about 12, preferably 1 to about 6, and the total number of ring members varies from three to about 15, preferably from about 3 to about 8. Preferred ring heteroatoms are N, O and S. Preferred heterocycloalkyl groups include morpholino, thiomorpholino, piperidinyl, piperazinyl, homopiperidinyl, homopiperazinyl, homomorpholino, homothiomorpholino, pyrrolodinyl, tetrahydrooxazolyl, tetrahydroimidazolyl, tetrahydrothiazolyl, tetrahydroisoxazolyl, tetrahydropyrrazolyl, furanyl, pyranyl, and tetrahydroisothiazolyl.

Unless otherwise defined herein, aryl means any hydrocarbon ring structure containing at least one aryl ring. Preferred aryl rings have about 6 to about 20 ring carbons. Especially preferred aryl rings include phenyl, napthyl, anthracenyl, and phenanthrenyl.

Unless otherwise defined herein, hetaryl means a ring moiety containing at least one fully unsaturated ring, the ring consisting of carbon and non-carbon atoms. Preferably the ring system contains about 1 to about 4 rings. Preferably the number of carbon atoms varies from 1 to about 12, preferably 1 to about 6, and the total number of ring members varies from three to about 15, preferably from about 3 to about 8. Preferred ring heteroatoms are N, O and S. Preferred hetaryl moieties include pyrazolyl, thiophenyl, pyridyl, imidazolyl, tetrazolyl, pyridyl, pyrimidinyl, purinyl, quinazolinyl, quinoxalinyl, benzimidazolyl, benzothiophenyl, etc.

Unless otherwise defined herein, where a moiety is defined as a compound moiety, such as hetarylalkyl (hetaryl and alkyl), aralkyl (aryl and alkyl), etc., each of the sub-moieties is as defined herein.

Unless otherwise defined herein, an electron withdrawing group is a group, such as the cyano or isocyanato group that draws electronic charge away from the carbon to which it is attached. Other electron withdrawing groups of note include those whose electronegativities exceed that of carbon, for example halogen, nitro, or phenyl substituted in the ortho- or para-position with one or more cyano, isothiocyanato, nitro or halo groups.

Unless otherwise defined herein, the terms halogen and halo have their ordinary meanings. Preferred halo (halogen) substituents are Cl, Br, and I.

The aforementioned optional substituents are, unless otherwise herein defined, suitable substituents depending upon desired properties. Included are halogens (Cl, Br, I), alkyl, alkenyl, and alkynyl moieties, NO₂, NH₃ (substituted and unsubstituted), acid moieties (e.g. —CO₂H, —OSO₃H₂, etc.), heterocycloalkyl moieties, hetaryl moieties, aryl moieties, etc.

In all the preceding formulae, the squiggle (−) indicates a bond to an oxygen or sulfur of the 5′-phosphate. Phosphate protecting groups include those described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,760,209, U.S. Pat. No. 5,614,621, U.S. Pat. No. 6,051,699, U.S. Pat. No. 6,020,475, U.S. Pat. No. 6,326,478, U.S. Pat. No. 6,169,177, U.S. Pat. No. 6,121,437, U.S. Pat. No. 6,465,628 each of which is expressly incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

Oligomer Synthesis

Oligomerization of modified and unmodified nucleosides is performed according to literature procedures for DNA (Protocols for Oligonucleotides and Analogs, Ed. Agrawal (1993), Humana Press) and/or RNA (Scaringe, Methods (2001), 23, 206-217. Gait et al., Applications of Chemically synthesized RNA in RNA:Protein Interactions, Ed. Smith (1998), 1-36. Gallo et al., Tetrahedron (2001), 57, 5707-5713) synthesis as appropriate. In addition specific protocols for the synthesis of oligomeric compounds of the invention are illustrated in the examples below.

The oligomeric compounds used in accordance with this invention may be conveniently and routinely made through the well-known technique of solid phase synthesis. Equipment for such synthesis is sold by several vendors including, for example, Applied Biosystems (Foster City, Calif.). Any other means for such synthesis known in the art may additionally or alternatively be employed. It is well known to use similar techniques to prepare oligonucleotides such as the phosphorothioates and alkylated derivatives.

The present invention is also useful for the preparation of oligomeric compounds incorporating at least one 2′-O-protected nucleoside. After incorporation and appropriate deprotection the 2′-O-protected nucleoside will be converted to a ribonucleoside at the position of incorporation. The number and position of the 2-ribonucleoside units in the final oligomeric compound can vary from one at any site or the strategy can be used to prepare up to a full 2′-OH modified oligomeric compound. All 2′-O-protecting groups amenable to the synthesis of oligomeric compounds are included in the present invention. In general a protected nucleoside is attached to a solid support by for example a succinate linker. Then the oligonucleotide is elongated by repeated cycles of deprotecting the 5′-terminal hydroxyl group, coupling of a further nucleoside unit, capping and oxidation (alternatively sulfurization). In a more frequently used method of synthesis the completed oligonucleotide is cleaved from the solid support with the removal of phosphate protecting groups and exocyclic amino protecting groups by treatment with an ammonia solution. Then a further deprotection step is normally required for removal of the more specialized protecting groups used for the protection of 2′-hydroxyl groups thereby affording the fully deprotected oligonucleotide.

A large number of 2′-O-protecting groups have been used for the synthesis of oligoribonucleotides but over the years more effective groups have been discovered. The key to an effective 2′-O-protecting group is that it is capable of selectively being introduced at the 2′-O-position and that it can be removed easily after synthesis without the formation of unwanted side products. The protecting group also needs to be inert to the normal deprotecting, coupling, and capping steps required for oligoribonucleotide synthesis. Some of the protecting groups used initially for oligoribonucleotide synthesis included tetrahydropyran-1-yl and 4-methoxytetrahydropyran-4-yl. These two groups are not compatible with all 5′-O-protecting groups so modified versions were used with 5′-DMT groups such as 1-(2-fluorophenyl)-4-methoxypiperidin-4-yl (Fpmp). Reese has identified a number of piperidine derivatives (like Fpmp) that are useful in the synthesis of oligoribonucleotides including 1-[(chloro-4-methyl)phenyl]-4′-methoxypiperidin-4-yl (Reese et al., Tetrahedron Lett., 1986, (27), 2291). Another approach was to replace the standard 5′-DMT (dimethoxytrityl) group with protecting groups that were removed under non-acidic conditions such as levulinyl and 9-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl. Such groups enable the use of acid labile 2′-protecting groups for oligoribonucleotide synthesis. Another more widely used protecting group initially used for the synthesis of oligoribonucleotides was the t-butyldimethylsilyl group (Ogilvie et al., Tetrahedron Lett., 1974, 2861; Hakimelahi et al., Tetrahedron Lett., 1981, (22), 2543; and Jones et al., J. Chem. Soc. Perkin I., 2762). The 2′-O-protecting groups can require special reagents for their removal such as for example the t-butyldimethylsilyl group is normally removed after all other cleaving/deprotecting steps by treatment of the oligomeric compound with tetrabutylammonium fluoride (TBAF).

One group of researchers examined a number of 2′-O-protecting groups (Pitsch, S., Chimia, 2001, (55), 320-324.) The group examined fluoride labile and photolabile protecting groups that are removed using moderate conditions. One photolabile group that was examined was the [2-(nitrobenzyl)oxy]methyl (nbm) protecting group (Schwartz et al., Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 1992, (2), 1019.) Other groups examined included a number structurally related formaldehyde acetal-derived, 2′-O-protecting groups. Also prepared were a number of related protecting groups for preparing 2′-O-alkylated nucleoside phosphoramidites including 2′-O-[(triisopropylsilyl)oxy]methyl (2′-O—CH₂—O—Si(iPr)₃, TOM). One 2′-O-protecting group that was prepared to be used orthogonally to the TOM group was 2′-O—[(R)-1-(2-nitrophenyl)ethyloxy)methyl] ((R)-mnbm).

Another strategy using a fluoride labile 5′-O-protecting group (non-acid labile) and an acid labile 2′-O-protecting group has been reported (Scaringe, Stephen A., Methods, 2001, (23) 206-217). A number of possible silyl ethers were examined for 5′-O-protection and a number of acetals and orthoesters were examined for 2′-O-protection. The protection scheme that gave the best results was 5′-O-silyl ether-2′-ACE (5′-O-bis(trimethylsiloxy)cyclododecyloxysilyl ether (DOD)-2′-O-bis(2-acetoxyethoxy)methyl (ACE). This approach uses a modified phosphoramidite synthesis approach in that some different reagents are required that are not routinely used for RNA/DNA synthesis.

Although a lot of research has focused on the synthesis of oligoribonucleotides the main RNA synthesis strategies that are presently being used commercially include 5′-O-DMT-2′-O-t-butyldimethylsilyl (TBDMS), 5′-O-DMT-2′-O-[1(2-fluorophenyl)-4-methoxypiperidin-4-yl] (FPMP), 2′-O-[(triisopropylsilyl)oxy]methyl (2′-O—CH₂—O—Si(iPr)₃ (TOM), and the 5′-O-silyl ether-2′-ACE (5′-O-bis(trimethylsiloxy)cyclododecyloxysilyl ether (DOD)-2′-O-bis(2-acetoxyethoxy)methyl (ACE). A current list of some of the major companies currently offering RNA products include Pierce Nucleic Acid Technologies, Dharmacon Research Inc., Ameri Biotechnologies Inc., and Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc. One company, Princeton Separations, is marketing an RNA synthesis activator advertised to reduce coupling times especially with TOM and TBDMS chemistries. Such an activator would also be amenable to the present invention.

The primary groups being used for commercial RNA synthesis are:

-   -   TBDMS=5′-O-DMT-2′-O-t-butyldimethylsilyl;     -   TOM=2′-O-[(triisopropylsilyl)oxy]methyl;     -   DOD/ACE=(5′-O-bis(trimethylsiloxy)cyclododecyloxysilyl         ether-2′-O-bis(2-acetoxyethoxy)methyl     -   FPMP=5′-O-DMT-2′-O-[1(2-fluorophenyl)-4-methoxypiperidin-4-yl].

All of the aforementioned RNA synthesis strategies are amenable to the present invention. Strategies that would be a hybrid of the above e.g. using a 5′-protecting group from one strategy with a 2′-O-protecting from another strategy is also amenable to the present invention.

The preparation of ribonucleotides and oligomeric compounds having at least one ribonucleoside incorporated and all the possible configurations falling in between these two extremes are encompassed by the present invention. The corresponding oligomeric compounds can be hybridized to further oligomeric compounds including oligoribonucleotides having regions of complementarity to form double-stranded (duplexed) oligomeric compounds. Such double stranded oligonucleotide moieties have been shown in the art to modulate target expression and regulate translation as well as RNA processsing via an antisense mechanism. Moreover, the double-stranded moieties may be subject to chemical modifications (Fire et al., Nature, 1998, 391, 806-811; Timmons and Fire, Nature 1998, 395, 854; Timmons et al., Gene, 2001, 263, 103-112; Tabara et al., Science, 1998, 282, 430-431; Montgomery et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1998, 95, 15502-15507; Tuschl et al., Genes Dev., 1999, 13, 3191-3197; Elbashir et al., Nature, 2001, 411, 494-498; Elbashir et al., Genes Dev. 2001, 15, 188-200). For example, such double-stranded moieties have been shown to inhibit the target by the classical hybridization of antisense strand of the duplex to the target, thereby triggering enzymatic degradation of the target (Tijsterman et al., Science, 2002, 295, 694-697).

The methods of preparing oligomeric compounds of the present invention can also be applied in the areas of drug discovery and target validation. The present invention comprehends the use of the oligomeric compounds and preferred targets identified herein in drug discovery efforts to elucidate relationships that exist between proteins and a disease state, phenotype, or condition. These methods include detecting or modulating a target peptide comprising contacting a sample, tissue, cell, or organism with the oligomeric compounds of the present invention, measuring the nucleic acid or protein level of the target and/or a related phenotypic or chemical endpoint at some time after treatment, and optionally comparing the measured value to a non-treated sample or sample treated with a further oligomeric compound of the invention. These methods can also be performed in parallel or in combination with other experiments to determine the function of unknown genes for the process of target validation or to determine the validity of a particular gene product as a target for treatment or prevention of a particular disease, condition, or phenotype.

Effect of nucleoside modifications on RNAi activity is evaluated according to existing literature (Elbashir et al., Nature (2001), 411, 494-498; Nishikura et al., Cell (2001), 107, 415-416; and Bass et al., Cell (2000), 101, 235-238.)

Targets of the Invention

“Targeting” an antisense oligomeric compound to a particular nucleic acid molecule, in the context of this invention, can be a multistep process. The process usually begins with the identification of a target nucleic acid whose function is to be modulated. This target nucleic acid may be, for example, a cellular gene (or mRNA transcribed from the gene) whose expression is associated with a particular disorder or disease state, or a nucleic acid molecule from an infectious agent.

The targeting process usually also includes determination of at least one target region, segment, or site within the target nucleic acid for the antisense interaction to occur such that the desired effect, e.g., modulation of expression, will result. Within the context of the present invention, the term “region” is defined as a portion of the target nucleic acid having at least one identifiable structure, function, or characteristic. Within regions of target nucleic acids are segments. “Segments” are defined as smaller or sub-portions of regions within a target nucleic acid. “Sites,” as used in the present invention, are defined as positions within a target nucleic acid. The terms region, segment, and site can also be used to describe an oligomeric compound of the invention such as for example a gapped oligomeric compound having 3 separate segments.

Since, as is known in the art, the translation initiation codon is typically 5′-AUG (in transcribed mRNA molecules; 5′-ATG in the corresponding DNA molecule), the translation initiation codon is also referred to as the “AUG codon,” the “start codon” or the “AUG start codon”. A minority of genes have a translation initiation codon having the RNA sequence 5′-GUG, 5′-UUG or 5′-CUG, and 5′-AUA, 5′-ACG and 5′-CUG have been shown to function in vivo. Thus, the terms “translation initiation codon” and “start codon” can encompass many codon sequences, even though the initiator amino acid in each instance is typically methionine (in eukaryotes) or formylmethionine (in prokaryotes). It is also known in the art that eukaryotic and prokaryotic genes may have two or more alternative start codons, any one of which may be preferentially utilized for translation initiation in a particular cell type or tissue, or under a particular set of conditions. In the context of the invention, “start codon” and “translation initiation codon” refer to the codon or codons that are used in vivo to initiate translation of an mRNA transcribed from a gene encoding a nucleic acid target, regardless of the sequence(s) of such codons. It is also known in the art that a translation termination codon (or “stop codon”) of a gene may have one of three sequences, i.e., 5′-UAA, 5′-UAG and 5′-UGA (the corresponding DNA sequences are 5′-TAA, 5′-TAG and 5′-TGA, respectively).

The terms “start codon region” and “translation initiation codon region” refer to a portion of such an mRNA or gene that encompasses from about 25 to about 50 contiguous nucleotides in either direction (i.e., 5′ or 3′) from a translation initiation codon. Similarly, the terms “stop codon region” and “translation termination codon region” refer to a portion of such an mRNA or gene that encompasses from about 25 to about 50 contiguous nucleotides in either direction (i.e., 5′ or 3′) from a translation termination codon. Consequently, the “start codon region” (or “translation initiation codon region”) and the “stop codon region” (or “translation termination codon region”) are all regions which may be targeted effectively with the antisense oligomeric compounds of the present invention.

The open reading frame (ORF) or “coding region,” which is known in the art to refer to the region between the translation initiation codon and the translation termination codon, is also a region which may be targeted effectively. Within the context of the present invention, a preferred region is the intragenic region encompassing the translation initiation or termination codon of the open reading frame (ORF) of a gene.

Other target regions include the 5′ untranslated region (5′UTR), known in the art to refer to the portion of an mRNA in the 5′ direction from the translation initiation codon, and thus including nucleotides between the 5′ cap site and the translation initiation codon of an mRNA (or corresponding nucleotides on the gene), and the 3′ untranslated region (3′UTR), known in the art to refer to the portion of an mRNA in the 3′ direction from the translation termination codon, and thus including nucleotides between the translation termination codon and 3′ end of an mRNA (or corresponding nucleotides on the gene). The 5′ cap site of an mRNA comprises an N7-methylated guanosine residue joined to the 5′-most residue of the mRNA via a 5′-5′ triphosphate linkage. The 5′ cap region of an mRNA is considered to include the 5′ cap structure itself as well as the first 50 nucleotides adjacent to the cap site. It is also preferred to target the 5′ cap region.

Although some eukaryotic mRNA transcripts are directly translated, many contain one or more regions, known as “introns,” which are excised from a transcript before it is translated. The remaining (and therefore translated) regions are known as “exons” and are spliced together to form a continuous mRNA sequence. Targeting splice sites, i.e., intron-exon junctions or exon-intron junctions, may also be particularly useful in situations where aberrant splicing is implicated in disease, or where an overproduction of a particular splice product is implicated in disease. Aberrant fusion junctions due to rearrangements or deletions are also preferred target sites. mRNA transcripts produced via the process of splicing of two (or more) mRNAs from different gene sources are known as “fusion transcripts”. It is also known that introns can be effectively targeted using antisense oligomeric compounds targeted to, for example, DNA or pre-mRNA.

It is also known in the art that alternative RNA transcripts can be produced from the same genomic region of DNA. These alternative transcripts are generally known as “variants”. More specifically, “pre-mRNA variants” are transcripts produced from the same genomic DNA that differ from other transcripts produced from the same genomic DNA in either their start or stop position and contain both intronic and exonic sequences.

Upon excision of one or more exon or intron regions, or portions thereof during splicing, pre-mRNA variants produce smaller “mRNA variants”. Consequently, mRNA variants are processed pre-mRNA variants and each unique pre-mRNA variant must always produce a unique mRNA variant as a result of splicing. These mRNA variants are also known as “alternative splice variants”. If no splicing of the pre-mRNA variant occurs then the pre-mRNA variant is identical to the mRNA variant.

It is also known in the art that variants can be produced through the use of alternative signals to start or stop transcription and that pre-mRNAs and mRNAs can possess more that one start codon or stop codon. Variants that originate from a pre-mRNA or mRNA that use alternative start codons are known as “alternative start variants” of that pre-mRNA or mRNA. Those transcripts that use an alternative stop codon are known as “alternative stop variants” of that pre-mRNA or mRNA. One specific type of alternative stop variant is the “polyA variant” in which the multiple transcripts produced result from the alternative selection of one of the “polyA stop signals” by the transcription machinery, thereby producing transcripts that terminate at unique polyA sites. Within the context of the invention, the types of variants described herein are also preferred target nucleic acids.

The locations on the target nucleic acid to which the preferred antisense oligomeric compounds hybridize are hereinbelow referred to as “preferred target segments.” As used herein the term “preferred target segment” is defined as at least an 8-nucleobase portion of a target region to which an active antisense oligomeric compound is targeted. While not wishing to be bound by theory, it is presently believed that these target segments represent accessible portions of the target nucleic acid for hybridization.

The antisense oligomeric compounds of the present invention include oligomeric compounds that comprise at least the 8 consecutive nucleobases from the 5′-terminus of a targeted nucleic acid e.g. a cellular gene or mRNA transcribed from the gene (the remaining nucleobases being a consecutive stretch of the same oligonucleotide beginning immediately upstream of the 5′-terminus of the antisense compound which is specifically hybridizable to the target nucleic acid and continuing until the oligonucleotide contains from about 8 to about 80 nucleobases). Similarly preferred antisense oligomeric compounds are represented by oligonucleotide sequences that comprise at least the 8 consecutive nucleobases from the 3′-terminus of one of the illustrative preferred antisense compounds (the remaining nucleobases being a consecutive stretch of the same oligonucleotide beginning immediately downstream of the 3′-terminus of the antisense compound which is specifically hybridizable to the target nucleic acid and continuing until the oligonucleotide contains from about 8 to about 80 nucleobases). One having skill in the art armed with the preferred antisense compounds illustrated herein will be able, without undue experimentation, to identify further preferred antisense compounds.

Once one or more target regions, segments or sites have been identified, antisense oligomeric compounds are chosen which are sufficiently complementary to the target, i.e., hybridize sufficiently well and with sufficient specificity, to give the desired effect.

In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, a series of preferred compositions of nucleic acid duplexes comprising the antisense oligomeric compounds of the present invention and their complements can be designed for a specific target or targets. The ends of the strands may be modified by the addition of one or more natural or modified nucleobases to form an overhang. The sense strand of the duplex is then designed and synthesized as the complement of the antisense strand and may also contain modifications or additions to either terminus. For example, in one embodiment, both strands of the duplex would be complementary over the central nucleobases, each having overhangs at one or both termini.

In one embodiment, a duplex comprising an antisense oligomeric compound having the sequence CGAGAGGCGGACGGGACCG wherein the complement strand comprises two or more separate strands having a two-nucleobase overhang of deoxythymidine (dT) on the 3′-terminus of the antisense strand and the same overhang on the section of the complement (sense) strand would have the following structure:

    cgagaggcggacgggaccgdTdT Antisense Strand     ||||||||||||||||||| dTdTgctctccgcctgccctggc Complement Strand

A further embodiment includes compounds having the following structure where there are more than one small complement strands of equal or varying sizes from 2 to 7 nucleobases in length.

cgagaggcggacgggaccg Antisense Strand |||  |||   |||  ||| gct  ccg   gcc  ggc Complement Strands

A further embodiment includes compounds having the following structure where there are two complement strands of equal or varying sizes but unlinked at one point.

cgagaggcggacgggaccg Antisense Strand ||||||||| ||||||||| gctctccgc tgccctggc Complement Strand

RNA strands of the duplex can be synthesized by methods disclosed herein or purchased from various RNA synthesis companies such as for example Dharmacon Research Inc., (Lafayette, Colo.). Once synthesized, the complementary strands are annealed. The single strands are aliquoted and diluted to a concentration of 50 uM. Once diluted, 30 uL of each strand is combined with 15 uL of a 5× solution of annealing buffer. The final concentration of the buffer is 100 mM potassium acetate, 30 mM HEPES-KOH pH 7.4, and 2 mM magnesium acetate. The final volume is 75 uL. This solution is incubated for 1 minute at 90° C. and then centrifuged for 15 seconds. The tube is allowed to sit for 1 hour at 37° C. at which time the dsRNA duplexes are used in experimentation. The final concentration of the dsRNA compound is 20 uM. This solution can be stored frozen (−20° C.) and freeze-thawed up to 5 times.

Once prepared, the desired synthetic duplexs are evaluated for their ability to modulate target expression. When cells reach 80% confluency, they are treated with synthetic duplexs comprising at least one oligomeric compound of the invention. For cells grown in 96-well plates, wells are washed once with 200 μL OPTI-MEM-1 reduced-serum medium (Gibco BRL) and then treated with 130 μL of OPTI-MEM-1 containing 12 μg/mL LIPOFECTIN (Gibco BRL) and the desired dsRNA compound at a final concentration of 200 nM. After 5 hours of treatment, the medium is replaced with fresh medium. Cells are harvested 16 hours after treatment, at which time RNA is isolated and target reduction measured by RT-PCR.

In a further embodiment, the “preferred target segments” identified herein may be employed in a screen for additional oligomeric compounds that modulate the expression of a target. “Modulators” are those oligomeric compounds that decrease or increase the expression of a nucleic acid molecule encoding a target and which comprise at least an 8-nucleobase portion which is complementary to a preferred target segment. The screening method comprises the steps of contacting a preferred target segment of a nucleic acid molecule encoding a target with one or more candidate modulators, and selecting for one or more candidate modulators which decrease or increase the expression of a nucleic acid molecule encoding a target. Once it is shown that the candidate modulator or modulators are capable of modulating (e.g. either decreasing or increasing) the expression of a nucleic acid molecule encoding a target, the modulator may then be employed in further investigative studies of the function of a target, or for use as a research, diagnostic, or therapeutic agent in accordance with the present invention.

The preferred target segments of the present invention may also be combined with their respective complementary antisense oligomeric compounds of the present invention to form stabilized double-stranded (duplexed) oligonucleotides.

Hybridization

In the context of this invention, “hybridization” occurs when two sequences come together with enough base complementarity to form a double stranded region. The source of the two sequences can be synthetic or native and can occur in a single strand when the strand has regions of self complementarity. In the present invention, the preferred mechanism of pairing involves hydrogen bonding, which may be Watson-Crick, Hoogsteen or reversed Hoogsteen hydrogen bonding, between complementary nucleoside or nucleotide bases (nucleobases) of the strands of oligomeric compounds or between an oligomeric compound and a target nucleic acid. For example, adenine and thymine are complementary nucleobases which pair through the formation of hydrogen bonds. Hybridization can occur under varying circumstances.

An antisense oligomeric compound is specifically hybridizable when binding of the compound to the target nucleic acid interferes with the normal function of the target nucleic acid to cause a loss of activity, and there is a sufficient degree of complementarity to avoid non-specific binding of the antisense oligomeric compound to non-target nucleic acid sequences under conditions in which specific binding is desired, i.e., under physiological conditions in the case of in vivo assays or therapeutic treatment, and under conditions in which assays are performed in the case of in vitro assays.

In the present invention the phrase “stringent hybridization conditions” or “stringent conditions” refers to conditions under which an oligomeric compound of the invention will hybridize to its target sequence, but to a minimal number of other sequences. Stringent conditions are sequence-dependent and will vary with different circumstances and in the context of this invention, “stringent conditions” under which oligomeric compounds hybridize to a target sequence are determined by the nature and composition of the oligomeric compounds and the assays in which they are being investigated.

“Complementary,” as used herein, refers to the capacity for precise pairing of two nucleobases regardless of where the two are located. For example, if a nucleobase at a certain position of an oligomeric compound is capable of hydrogen bonding with a nucleobase at a certain position of a target nucleic acid, the target nucleic acid being a DNA, RNA, or oligonucleotide molecule, then the position of hydrogen bonding between the oligonucleotide and the target nucleic acid is considered to be a complementary position. The oligomeric compound and the further DNA, RNA, or oligonucleotide molecule are complementary to each other when a sufficient number of complementary positions in each molecule are occupied by nucleobases which can hydrogen bond with each other. Thus, “specifically hybridizable” and “complementary” are terms which are used to indicate a sufficient degree of precise pairing or complementarity over a sufficient number of nucleobases such that stable and specific binding occurs between the oligonucleotide and a target nucleic acid.

It is understood in the art that the sequence of an antisense oligomeric compound need not be 100% complementary to that of its target nucleic acid to be specifically hybridizable. Moreover, an oligonucleotide may hybridize over one or more segments such that intervening or adjacent segments are not involved in the hybridization event (e.g., a loop structure or hairpin structure). It is preferred that the antisense oligomeric compounds of the present invention comprise at least 70% sequence complementarity to a target region within the target nucleic acid, more preferably that they comprise 90% sequence complementarity and even more preferably comprise 95% sequence complementarity to the target region within the target nucleic acid sequence to which they are targeted. For example, an antisense oligomeric compound in which 18 of 20 nucleobases of the antisense oligomeric compound are complementary to a target region, and would therefore specifically hybridize, would represent 90 percent complementarity. In this example, the remaining noncomplementary nucleobases may be clustered or interspersed with complementary nucleobases and need not be contiguous to each other or to complementary nucleobases. As such, an antisense oligomeric compound which is 18 nucleobases in length having 4 (four) noncomplementary nucleobases which are flanked by two regions of complete complementarity with the target nucleic acid would have 77.8% overall complementarity with the target nucleic acid and would thus fall within the scope of the present invention. Percent complementarity of an antisense oligomeric compound with a region of a target nucleic acid can be determined routinely using BLAST programs (basic local alignment search tools) and PowerBLAST programs known in the art (Altschul et al., J. Mol. Biol., 1990, 215, 403-410; Zhang and Madden, Genome Res., 1997, 7, 649-656).

Screening and Target Validation

In a further embodiment, “preferred target segments” may be employed in a screen for additional oligomeric compounds that modulate the expression of a selected protein. “Modulators” are those oligomeric compounds that decrease or increase the expression of a nucleic acid molecule encoding a protein and which comprise at least an 8-nucleobase portion which is complementary to a preferred target segment. The screening method comprises the steps of contacting a preferred target segment of a nucleic acid molecule encoding a protein with one or more candidate modulators, and selecting for one or more candidate modulators which decrease or increase the expression of a nucleic acid molecule encoding a protein. Once it is shown that the candidate modulator or modulators are capable of modulating (e.g. either decreasing or increasing) the expression of a nucleic acid molecule encoding a peptide, the modulator may then be employed in further investigative studies of the function of the peptide, or for use as a research, diagnostic, or therapeutic agent in accordance with the present invention.

The preferred target segments of the present invention may also be combined with their respective complementary antisense oligomeric compounds of the present invention to form stabilized double-stranded (duplexed) oligonucleotides. Such double stranded oligonucleotide moieties have been shown in the art to modulate target expression and regulate translation as well as RNA processsing via an antisense mechanism. Moreover, the double-stranded moieties may be subject to chemical modifications (Fire et al., Nature, 1998, 391, 806-811; Timmons and Fire, Nature 1998, 395, 854; Timmons et al., Gene, 2001, 263, 103-112; Tabara et al., Science, 1998, 282, 430-431; Montgomery et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1998, 95, 15502-15507; Tuschl et al., Genes Dev., 1999, 13, 3191-3197; Elbashir et al., Nature, 2001, 411, 494-498; Elbashir et al., Genes Dev. 2001, 15, 188-200). For example, such double-stranded moieties have been shown to inhibit the target by the classical hybridization of antisense strand of the duplex to the target, thereby triggering enzymatic degradation of the target (Tijsterman et al., Science, 2002, 295, 694-697).

The compositions comprising oligomeric compounds of the present invention can also be applied in the areas of drug discovery and target validation. The present invention comprehends the use of the oligomeric compounds and preferred targets identified herein in drug discovery efforts to elucidate relationships that exist between proteins and a disease state, phenotype, or condition. These methods include detecting or modulating a target peptide comprising contacting a sample, tissue, cell, or organism with the oligomeric compounds of the present invention, measuring the nucleic acid or protein level of the target and/or a related phenotypic or chemical endpoint at some time after treatment, and optionally comparing the measured value to a non-treated sample or sample treated with a further oligomeric compound of the invention. These methods can also be performed in parallel or in combination with other experiments to determine the function of unknown genes for the process of target validation or to determine the validity of a particular gene product as a target for treatment or prevention of a particular disease, condition, or phenotype.

Effect of nucleoside modifications on RNAi activity is evaluated according to existing literature (Elbashir et al., Nature (2001), 411, 494-498; Nishikura et al., Cell (2001), 107, 415-416; and Bass et al., Cell (2000), 101, 235-238.)

Kits, Research Reagents, Diagnostics, and Therapeutics

The compositions of oligomeric compounds of the present invention can be utilized for diagnostics, therapeutics, prophylaxis and as research reagents and kits. Furthermore, antisense oligonucleotides, which are able to inhibit gene expression with exquisite specificity, are often used by those of ordinary skill to elucidate the function of particular genes or to distinguish between functions of various members of a biological pathway.

For use in kits and diagnostics, the compositions of the present invention, either alone or in combination with other oligomeric compounds or therapeutics, can be used as tools in differential and/or combinatorial analyses to elucidate expression patterns of a portion or the entire complement of genes expressed within cells and tissues.

As one nonlimiting example, expression patterns within cells or tissues treated with one or more antisense oligomeric compounds are compared to control cells or tissues not treated with antisense oligomeric compounds and the patterns produced are analyzed for differential levels of gene expression as they pertain, for example, to disease association, signaling pathway, cellular localization, expression level, size, structure or function of the genes examined. These analyses can be performed on stimulated or unstimulated cells and in the presence or absence of other compounds and or oligomeric compounds that affect expression patterns.

Examples of methods of gene expression analysis known in the art include DNA arrays or microarrays (Brazma and Vilo, FEBS Lett., 2000, 480, 17-24; Celis, et al., FEBS Lett., 2000, 480, 2-16), SAGE (serial analysis of gene expression) (Madden, et al., Drug Discov. Today, 2000, 5, 415-425), READS (restriction enzyme amplification of digested cDNAs) (Prashar and Weissman, Methods Enzymol., 1999, 303, 258-72), TOGA (total gene expression analysis) (Sutcliffe, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 2000, 97, 1976-81), protein arrays and proteomics (Celis, et al., FEBS Lett., 2000, 480, 2-16; Jungblut, et al., Electrophoresis, 1999, 20, 2100-10), expressed sequence tag (EST) sequencing (Celis, et al., FEBS Lett., 2000, 480, 2-16; Larsson, et al., J. Biotechnol., 2000, 80, 143-57), subtractive RNA fingerprinting (SuRF) (Fuchs, et al., Anal. Biochem., 2000, 286, 91-98; Larson, et al., Cytometry, 2000, 41, 203-208), subtractive cloning, differential display (DD) (Jurecic and Belmont, Curr. Opin. Microbiol., 2000, 3, 316-21), comparative genomic hybridization (Carulli, et al., J. Cell Biochem. Suppl., 1998, 31, 286-96), FISH (fluorescent in situ hybridization) techniques (Going and Gusterson, Eur. J. Cancer, 1999, 35, 1895-904) and mass spectrometry methods (To, Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen, 2000, 3, 235-41).

The compositions of the invention are useful for research and diagnostics in one sense because the oligomeric compounds of the compositions hybridize to nucleic acids encoding proteins. For example, oligonucleotides that are shown to hybridize with such efficiency and under such conditions as disclosed herein as to be effective protein inhibitors will also be effective primers or probes under conditions favoring gene amplification or detection, respectively. These primers and probes are useful in methods requiring the specific detection of nucleic acid molecules encoding proteins and in the amplification of the nucleic acid molecules for detection or for use in further studies. Hybridization of the antisense oligonucleotides, particularly the primers and probes, of the invention with a nucleic acid can be detected by means known in the art. Such means may include conjugation of an enzyme to the oligonucleotide, radiolabelling of the oligonucleotide or any other suitable detection means. Kits using such detection means for detecting the level of selected proteins in a sample may also be prepared.

The specificity and sensitivity of antisense methodologies is also harnessed by those of skill in the art for therapeutic uses. Antisense oligomeric compounds have been employed as therapeutic moieties in the treatment of disease states in animals, including humans. Antisense oligonucleotide drugs, including ribozymes, have been safely and effectively administered to humans and numerous clinical trials are presently underway. It is thus established that antisense oligomeric compounds can be useful therapeutic modalities that can be configured to be useful in treatment regimes for the treatment of cells, tissues and animals, especially humans.

For therapeutics, an animal, preferably a human, suspected of having a disease or disorder which can be treated by modulating the expression of a selected protein is treated by administering compositions of the invention in accordance with this invention. For example, in one non-limiting embodiment, the methods comprise the step of administering to the animal in need of treatment, a therapeutically effective amount of a protein inhibitor. The protein inhibitors of the present invention effectively inhibit the activity of the protein or inhibit the expression of the protein. In one embodiment, the activity or expression of a protein in an animal is inhibited by about 10%. Preferably, the activity or expression of a protein in an animal is inhibited by about 30%. More preferably, the activity or expression of a protein in an animal is inhibited by 50% or more. For example, the reduction of the expression of a protein may be measured in serum, adipose tissue, liver or any other body fluid, tissue or organ of the animal. Preferably, the cells contained within the fluids, tissues or organs being analyzed contain a nucleic acid molecule encoding a protein and/or the protein itself.

The compositions of the invention can be utilized in pharmaceutical compositions by adding an effective amount to a suitable pharmaceutically acceptable diluent or carrier. Use of the compositions and methods of the invention may also be useful prophylactically.

Formulations

The compositions of the invention may also be admixed, encapsulated, conjugated or otherwise associated with other molecules, molecule structures or mixtures of compounds, as for example, liposomes, receptor-targeted molecules, oral, rectal, topical or other formulations, for assisting in uptake, distribution and/or absorption. Representative United States patents that teach the preparation of such uptake, distribution and/or absorption-assisting formulations include, but are not limited to, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,108,921; 5,354,844; 5,416,016; 5,459,127; 5,521,291; 5,543,158; 5,547,932; 5,583,020; 5,591,721; 4,426,330; 4,534,899; 5,013,556; 5,108,921; 5,213,804; 5,227,170; 5,264,221; 5,356,633; 5,395,619; 5,416,016; 5,417,978; 5,462,854; 5,469,854; 5,512,295; 5,527,528; 5,534,259; 5,543,152; 5,556,948; 5,580,575; and 5,595,756, each of which is herein incorporated by reference.

The compositions of the invention encompass any pharmaceutically acceptable salts, esters, or salts of such esters, or any other compound which, upon administration to an animal, including a human, is capable of providing (directly or indirectly) the biologically active metabolite or residue thereof Accordingly, for example, the disclosure is also drawn to prodrugs and pharmaceutically acceptable salts of the compositions of the invention, pharmaceutically acceptable salts of such prodrugs, and other bioequivalents. The term “prodrug” indicates a therapeutic agent that is prepared in an inactive form that is converted to an active form (i.e., drug) within the body or cells thereof by the action of endogenous enzymes or other chemicals and/or conditions. In particular, prodrug versions of the oligonucleotides of the invention are prepared as SATE [(S-acetyl-2-thioethyl)phosphate] derivatives according to the methods disclosed in WO 93/24510 to Gosselin et al., published Dec. 9, 1993 or in WO 94/26764 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,770,713 to Imbach et al.

The term “pharmaceutically acceptable salts” refers to physiologically and pharmaceutically acceptable salts of the oligomeric compounds of the invention: i.e., salts that retain the desired biological activity of the parent compound and do not impart undesired toxicological effects thereto. For oligonucleotides, preferred examples of pharmaceutically acceptable salts and their uses are further described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,287,860, which is incorporated herein in its entirety.

The present invention also includes pharmaceutical compositions and formulations which include the compositions of the invention. The pharmaceutical compositions of the present invention may be administered in a number of ways depending upon whether local or systemic treatment is desired and upon the area to be treated. Administration may be topical (including ophthalmic and to mucous membranes including vaginal and rectal delivery), pulmonary, e.g., by inhalation or insufflation of powders or aerosols, including by nebulizer; intratracheal, intranasal, epidermal and transdermal), oral or parenteral. Parenteral administration includes intravenous, intraarterial, subcutaneous, intraperitoneal or intramuscular injection or infusion; or intracranial, e.g., intrathecal or intraventricular, administration. Oligonucleotides with at least one 2′-O-methoxyethyl modification are believed to be particularly useful for oral administration. Pharmaceutical compositions and formulations for topical administration may include transdermal patches, ointments, lotions, creams, gels, drops, suppositories, sprays, liquids and powders. Conventional pharmaceutical carriers, aqueous, powder or oily bases, thickeners and the like may be necessary or desirable. Coated condoms, gloves and the like may also be useful.

The pharmaceutical formulations of the present invention, which may conveniently be presented in unit dosage form, may be prepared according to conventional techniques well known in the pharmaceutical industry. Such techniques include the step of bringing into association the active ingredients with the pharmaceutical carrier(s) or excipient(s). In general, the formulations are prepared by uniformly and intimately bringing into association the active ingredients with liquid carriers or finely divided solid carriers or both, and then, if necessary, shaping the product.

The compositions of the present invention may be formulated into any of many possible dosage forms such as, but not limited to, tablets, capsules, gel capsules, liquid syrups, soft gels, suppositories, and enemas. The compositions of the present invention may also be formulated as suspensions in aqueous, non-aqueous or mixed media. Aqueous suspensions may further contain substances which increase the viscosity of the suspension including, for example, sodium carboxymethylcellulose, sorbitol and/or dextran. The suspension may also contain stabilizers.

Pharmaceutical compositions of the present invention include, but are not limited to, solutions, emulsions, foams and liposome-containing formulations. The pharmaceutical compositions and formulations of the present invention may comprise one or more penetration enhancers, carriers, excipients or other active or inactive ingredients.

Emulsions are typically heterogenous systems of one liquid dispersed in another in the form of droplets usually exceeding 0.1 μm in diameter. Emulsions may contain additional components in addition to the dispersed phases, and the active drug which may be present as a solution in either the aqueous phase, oily phase or itself as a separate phase. Microemulsions are included as an embodiment of the present invention. Emulsions and their uses are well known in the art and are further described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,287,860, which is incorporated herein in its entirety.

Formulations of the present invention include liposomal formulations. As used in the present invention, the term “liposome” means a vesicle composed of amphiphilic lipids arranged in a spherical bilayer or bilayers. Liposomes are unilamellar or multilamellar vesicles which have a membrane formed from a lipophilic material and an aqueous interior that contains the composition to be delivered. Cationic liposomes are positively charged liposomes which are believed to interact with negatively charged DNA molecules to form a stable complex. Liposomes that are pH-sensitive or negatively-charged are believed to entrap DNA rather than complex with it. Both cationic and noncationic liposomes have been used to deliver DNA to cells.

Liposomes also include “sterically stabilized” liposomes, a term which, as used herein, refers to liposomes comprising one or more specialized lipids that, when incorporated into liposomes, result in enhanced circulation lifetimes relative to liposomes lacking such specialized lipids. Examples of sterically stabilized liposomes are those in which part of the vesicle-forming lipid portion of the liposome comprises one or more glycolipids or is derivatized with one or more hydrophilic polymers, such as a polyethylene glycol (PEG) moiety. Liposomes and their uses are further described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,287,860, which is incorporated herein in its entirety.

The pharmaceutical formulations and compositions of the present invention may also include surfactants. The use of surfactants in drug products, formulations and in emulsions is well known in the art. Surfactants and their uses are further described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,287,860, which is incorporated herein in its entirety.

In one embodiment, the present invention employs various penetration enhancers to effect the efficient delivery of nucleic acids, particularly oligonucleotides. In addition to aiding the diffusion of non-lipophilic drugs across cell membranes, penetration enhancers also enhance the permeability of lipophilic drugs. Penetration enhancers may be classified as belonging to one of five broad categories, i.e., surfactants, fatty acids, bile salts, chelating agents, and non-chelating non-surfactants. Penetration enhancers and their uses are further described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,287,860, which is incorporated herein in its entirety.

One of skill in the art will recognize that formulations are routinely designed according to their intended use, i.e. route of administration.

Preferred formulations for topical administration include those in which the oligonucleotides of the invention are in admixture with a topical delivery agent such as lipids, liposomes, fatty acids, fatty acid esters, steroids, chelating agents and surfactants. Preferred lipids and liposomes include neutral (e.g. dioleoylphosphatidyl DOPE ethanolamine, dimyristoylphosphatidyl choline DMPC, distearolyphosphatidyl choline) negative (e.g. dimyristoylphosphatidyl glycerol DMPG) and cationic (e.g. dioleoyltetramethylaminopropyl DOTAP and dioleoylphosphatidyl ethanolamine DOTMA).

For topical or other administration, oligonucleotides of the invention may be encapsulated within liposomes or may form complexes thereto, in particular to cationic liposomes. Alternatively, oligonucleotides may be complexed to lipids, in particular to cationic lipids. Preferred fatty acids and esters, pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof, and their uses are further described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,287,860, which is incorporated herein in its entirety. Topical formulations are described in detail in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/315,298 filed on May 20, 1999, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

Compositions and formulations for oral administration include powders or granules, microparticulates, nanoparticulates, suspensions or solutions in water or non-aqueous media, capsules, gel capsules, sachets, tablets or minitablets. Thickeners, flavoring agents, diluents, emulsifiers, dispersing aids or binders may be desirable. Preferred oral formulations are those in which oligonucleotides of the invention are administered in conjunction with one or more penetration enhancers surfactants and chelators. Preferred surfactants include fatty acids and/or esters or salts thereof, bile acids and/or salts thereof Preferred bile acids/salts and fatty acids and their uses are further described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,287,860, which is incorporated herein in its entirety. Also preferred are combinations of penetration enhancers, for example, fatty acids/salts in combination with bile acids/salts. A particularly preferred combination is the sodium salt of lauric acid, capric acid and UDCA. Further penetration enhancers include polyoxyethylene-9-lauryl ether, polyoxyethylene-20-cetyl ether. Oligonucleotides of the invention may be delivered orally, in granular form including sprayed dried particles, or complexed to form micro or nanoparticles. Oligonucleotide complexing agents and their uses are further described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,287,860, which is incorporated herein in its entirety. Oral formulations for oligonucleotides and their preparation are described in detail in U.S. application Ser. No. 09/108,673 (filed Jul. 1, 1998), Ser. No. 09/315,298 (filed May 20, 1999) and Ser. No. 10/071,822, filed Feb. 8, 2002, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

Compositions and formulations for parenteral, intrathecal or intraventricular administration may include sterile aqueous solutions which may also contain buffers, diluents and other suitable additives such as, but not limited to, penetration enhancers, carrier compounds and other pharmaceutically acceptable carriers or excipients.

Certain embodiments of the invention provide pharmaceutical compositions containing one or more of the compositions of the invention and one or more other chemotherapeutic agents which function by a non-antisense mechanism. Examples of such chemotherapeutic agents include but are not limited to cancer chemotherapeutic drugs such as daunorubicin, daunomycin, dactinomycin, doxorubicin, epirubicin, idarubicin, esorubicin, bleomycin, mafosfamide, ifosfamide, cytosine ara-binoside, bis-chloroethylnitrosurea, busulfan, mitomycin C, actinomycin D, mithramycin, prednisone, hydroxyprogesterone, testosterone, tamoxifen, dacarbazine, procarbazine, hexamethyl-melamine, pentamethylmelamine, mitoxantrone, amsacrine, chlorambucil, methylcyclo-hexylnitrosurea, nitrogen mustards, melphalan, cyclophosphamide, 6-mercaptopurine, 6-thioguanine, cytarabine, 5-azacytidine, hydroxyurea, deoxycoformycin, 4-hydroxyperoxycyclophosphoramide, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), 5-fluorodeoxyuridine (5-FUdR), methotrexate (MTX), colchicine, taxol, vincristine, vinblastine, etoposide (VP-16), trimetrexate, irinotecan, topotecan, gemcitabine, teniposide, cisplatin and diethylstilbestrol (DES). When used with the compositions of the invention, such chemotherapeutic agents may be used individually (e.g., 5-FU and oligonucleotide), sequentially (e.g., 5-FU and oligonucleotide for a period of time followed by MTX and oligonucleotide), or in combination with one or more other such chemotherapeutic agents (e.g., 5-FU, MTX and oligonucleotide, or 5-FU, radiotherapy and oligonucleotide). Anti-inflammatory drugs, including but not limited to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and corticosteroids, and antiviral drugs, including but not limited to ribivirin, vidarabine, acyclovir and ganciclovir, may also be combined in compositions of the invention. Combinations of compositions of the invention and other non-antisense drugs are also within the scope of this invention. One or more compositions of the invention can be used in combination with other therapeutic agents to create a coctail as is currently the strategy for certain viral infections.

In another related embodiment, therapeutically effective combination therapies may comprise the use of two or more compositions of the invention wherein the multiple compositions are targeted to a single or multiple nucleic acid targets. Numerous examples of antisense oligomeric compounds are known in the art. Two or more combined compounds may be used together or sequentially

Dosing

The formulation of therapeutic compositions and their subsequent administration (dosing) is believed to be within the skill of those in the art. Dosing is dependent on severity and responsiveness of the disease state to be treated, with the course of treatment lasting from several days to several months, or until a cure is effected or a diminution of the disease state is achieved. Optimal dosing schedules can be calculated from measurements of drug accumulation in the body of the patient. Persons of ordinary skill can easily determine optimum dosages, dosing methodologies and repetition rates. Optimum dosages may vary depending on the relative potency of individual oligonucleotides, and can generally be estimated based on EC₅₀s found to be effective in in vitro and in vivo animal models. In general, dosage is from 0.01 ug to 100 g per kg of body weight, and may be given once or more daily, weekly, monthly or yearly, or even once every 2 to 20 years. Persons of ordinary skill in the art can easily estimate repetition rates for dosing based on measured residence times and concentrations of the drug in bodily fluids or tissues. Following successful treatment, it may be desirable to have the patient undergo maintenance therapy to prevent the recurrence of the disease state, wherein the oligonucleotide is administered in maintenance doses, ranging from 0.01 ug to 100 g per kg of body weight, once or more daily, to once every 20 years.

While the present invention has been described with specificity in accordance with certain of its preferred embodiments, the following examples serve only to illustrate the invention and are not intended to limit the same.

Example 1 Duplex Constructs Having Short Sense Strands Bound to 20mer Antisense Strands

The activity of different double strand constructs having short sense strands compared to the antisense strands was determined. The double strand constructs comprised 20 mer antisense strands having one or two 10 mer sense strands hybridized thereto. The study examined three basic motifs having the short sense strand hybridized at the 3′-end, the 5′-end or having 2 short sense strands hybridized one at the 3′-end and one at the 5′-end. The activity of the unmodified-antisense strand was compared to various chemically modified antisense strands using the three basic motifs. The study compared these double strand constructs to untreated and positive controls for their ability to inhibit PTEN mRNA levels in HUVEC cells.

ISIS# SEQ ID No: Sequence 5′-3′ 308746 1 AAGUAAGGACCAGAGACAAA (complete sense) 334471 2 AAGUAAGGAC (short sense) 334472 3 CAGAGACAAA (short sense) 303912 4 5′-P-U*U*U*G*U*C*U*C*U*G*G*U*C*C*U*U*A*C*U*U (as) 317502 4 5′-P-2′-F-U*2′-F-U*2′-F-U*G*2′-F-C*2′-F-U*C*U*G*G*U*C*2′F- C*2′F-U*2′-F-U*A*2′-F-C*2′-F-U*U (as) 319022 4 5′-P-2′-F-U*2′-F-U*2′-F-U*2′-F-G*2′-F-U*2′-F-C*2′-F-U*2′-F-C*2′-F-U*2′-F- G*2′-F-G*2′-F-U*2′-F-C*2′-F-C*2′-F-U*2′-F-U*2′-F-A*2′-F-C*2′-F-U*2′-F-U (as)

Constructs (AS/S) Activity (1, 5, 25 and 75 nM) 303912/none 115.5 107.3 45.5 31.7 303912/308746 18.5 15.0 26.8 30.2 303912/334471 and 334472 58.8 41.7 34.7 36.3 303912/334471 115.5 97.6 25.6 38.7 303912/334472 136.0 80.4 31.6 38.7 317502/none 67.6 82.4 53.8 63.7 317502/308746 13.4 14.6 53.1 54.6 317502/334471 and 334472 27.2 16.1 73.2 77.6 317502/334471 124.9 83.3 72.8 69.3 317502/334472 72.6 41.8 46.9 54.0 319022/none 104.2 140.9 126.0 115.5 319022/308746 60.4 73.4 118.5 118.2 319022/334471 and 334472 57.6 33.2 58.9 57.8 319022/334471 127.0 124.4 140.4 132.9 319022/334472 63.3 59.3 78.3 95.5 none phosphodiester *Phosphorothioate 2′-F 2′-Fluorine

Constructs S 5′-3′, AS 3′-5′ 334471 short sense strand XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX antisense strand 334472 short sense strand XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX antisense strand 334471 334472 2 sense strands XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX antisense strand.

Example 2 Constructs Having Antisense Strands with Linked Sense Strands Bound Thereto

The activity of different double strand constructs having short sense strands linked to a region of an antisense strand was determined. The double strand constructs comprise a 20 mer antisense strand having one or two 10 mer sense strands hybridized thereto. The 10 mer sense strands are covalently linked to the antisense strand through a linking moiety and are hybridized to a region of the antisense strand thereby forming a duplex region along the antisense strand. The study examined three basic motifs having the covalently linked short sense strands hybridized at the 3′ end, the 5′ end or having 2 covalently linked short sense strands hybridized with one at the 3′ end and the other at the 5′ end. The activity of the unmodified antisense strand was compared to various chemically modified antisense strands using the three basic motifs. The study compared these double strand constructs to untreated and positive controls for their ability to inhibit PTEN mRNA levels in HUVEC cells.

ISIS# SEQ ID No: Sequence 5′-3′ 271784 5 GUAAGGACCAGAGACAAAdTdT (s) 297803 6 UUUGUCUCUGGUCCUUACUdTdT (as) 317469 4 CAGAGACAAA-18s-UUUGUCUCUGGUCCUUACUU-18s-AAGUAAGGAC (s-18s-as-18s-s) 317470 4 CAGAGACAAA-18s-UUUGUCUCUGGUCCUUACUU- (s-18s-as, 5′-hairpin) 317471 4 UUUGUCUCUGGUCCUUACUU-18s-AAGUAAGGAC (as-18s-s, 3′-hairpin) none—phosphodiester *—Phosphorothioate F—Fluorine 18s—18 atom peg spacer

Constructs (AS/S) % Activity (50 nM) vs untreated control 297803/271784 12 317469 72 317470 75 317471 107.

Example 3 Duplex Constructs Having Short Sense Strands Bound to Antisense Strands

The activity of different double strand constructs having short sense strands compared to the antisense strands was determined. The double strand constructs comprised 20 mer antisense strands having one short strand hybridized at the 3′-end or one short strand hybridized at the 5′-end of the antisense oligomeric compound. The study examined these two basic motifs for a wide variety of antisense oligomeric compounds. The activity of the composition having the unmodified antisense strand was compared to various chemically modified antisense strands using the three basic motifs. The study compared these constructs to untreated and positive controls for their ability to inhibit PTEN mRNA levels in HUVEC cells.

ISIS# SEQ ID No: (activities) Sequence 5′-3′ (AS) 335449 4 (7.6, 19.2) P-U.U.U.G.U.C.U.C.U.G.G.U.C.C.U.U.A.C.U.U 303912 4 (10.1, 23.0) P-U*U*U*G*U*C*U*C*U*G*G*U*C*C*U*U*A* C*U*U 317502 4 (66.8, 43.5) P-2′-F-U*2′-F-U*2′-F-U*G*2′-F-U*2′-F-C*2′-F-U *C*U*G*G*U*C*2′-F-C*2′-F-U*2′-F-U*A*2′-F-C*2′F- U*U 319022 4 (58.3, 44.8) P-2′-F-U*2′-F-U*2′-F-U*2′-F-G*2′-F-U*2′-F-C*2′-F-U*2′- F-C*2′-F-U*2′-F-G*2′-F-G*2′-F-U*2′-F-C*2′-F-C*2′-F- U*2′-F-U*2′-F-A*2′-F-C*2′-F-U*2′-F-U 330916 7 (88.0, 54.7) P-U*U*U*G*U*C*U*C*U*G*G*(MOE)T*(MOE)C [5Me]*(MOE)C[5Me]*U*U*A*C*U*U 335226 4 (11.2, 59.8) P-U*U*U*G*U*mC*mU*mC*U*G*G*U*C*C*U* U*A*C*U*U 331426 4 (57.5, 60.1) P-U*U*U*G*U*C*U*C*(LNA)U*(LNA)G*(LNA) G*U*C*C*U*U*A*C*U*U 331427 4 (76.8, 60.1) P-U*U*U*G*U*(LNA)C*(LNA)U*(LNA)C*U*G*G* U*C*C*U*U*A*C*U*U 340570 4 (67.6, 60.2) P-mU*2′-F-U*mU*2′-F-G*mU*2′-F-C*mU*2′-F- C*mU*2′-F-G*mG*2′-F-U*mC*2′-F-C*mU*2′-F- U*mA*2′-F-C*mU*2′-F-U 317468 4 (114.8, 61.8) P-2′-F-U.2′-F-U.2′-F-U.G.U.C.U.C.U.G.G.U.C.C.U.U. A.2′-F-C.2′-F-U.U 334254 4 (60.1, 63.1) P-U*U*U*G*U*C*U*C*U*G*G*U*C*C*U*2′-F-U*2′ F-A*2′-F-C*2′-F-U*2′-F-U 317466 4 (94.7, 63.3) P-2′-F-U*2′-F-U*2′-F-U*G*U*C*U*C*U*G*G*U* C*C*U*U*A*2′-F-C*2′-F-U*U 333756 4 (71.9, 65.8) P-U*U*U*G*U*C*U*C*U*G*G*U*C*C*U*U*A*2′-F- C*2′-F-U*2′-F-U 319013 8 (84.2, 68.9) P-U*U*U*G*U*C*U*C*U*G*G*U*C*C*U*mU* U*mU 330915 9 (78.2, 69.2) P-*U*U*G*U*C*U*C*U*G*G*U*C*C*(MOE)T* *(MOE)A*C*U*U 331428 4 (81.4, 69.5) P-U*U*(LNA)U*(LNA)G*(LNA)U*C*U*C*U*G*G*U* C*C*U*U*A*C*U*U 333752 4 (95.2, 69.8) P-U*U*U*G*U*2′F-C*2′-F-U*2′-F-C*U*G*G* U*C*C*U*U*A*C*U*U 336678 4 (113.2, 70.9) P-4′-S-U.4′-S-U.4′-S-U.G.U.C.U.C.U.G.G.U.C.C. U.U.A.C.U.U 340572 4 (75.1, 72.0) P-2′-F-U*mU*2′-F-U*mG*2′F-U*mC*2′-F-U*mC*2′-F- U*mG*2′-F-G*mU*2′-F-C*mC*2′-F-U*mU*2′F- A*mC*2′-F-U*mU 334255 4 (108.1, 72.7) P-U*U*2′-F-U*2′-F-G*2′-F-U*C*U*C*U*G*G*U* C*C*U*U*A*C*U*U 319018 4 (95.2, 72.7) P-2′-F-U.2′-F-U.2′-F-U.2′-F-G.2′-F-U.2′-F-C.2′-F-U.2′-F- C.2′-F-U.2′-F-G.2′-F-G.2′-F-U.2′-F-C.2′-F-C.2′-F-U.2′-F- U.2′-F-A.2′-F-C.2′-F-U.2′-F-U 330918 10 (65.8, 73.0) P-U*U*U*G*U*(MOE)C[5Me]*(MOE)T*(MOE)C [5Me]*U*G*G*U*C*C*U*U*A*C*U*U 319017 11 (85.1, 73.0) P-U*U*U*G*U*C*U*C*U*G*dG*dT*dC*dC*dT* dT*dA*mC*mU*mU 331695 4 (69.6, 73.1) P-U*U*U*G*U*C*U*C*U*G*G*U*C*C*U*U* A*(LNA)C*(LNA)U*(LNA)U 316449 4 (84.5, 73.8) P-U*U*U*G*U*C*U*C*U*G*G*U*C*C*U* U*A*mC*mU*mU 329392 12 (117.5, 74.2) P-U*U*U*G*U*C*U*C*U*G*G*U*C*C*U*U*A* (MOE)C[5Me]*(MOE)T*(MOE)T 340653 4 (68.0, 75.6) P-U*U*U*G*U*C*U*C*U*G*G*U*C*C*(LNA)U* (LNA)U*(LNA)A*C*U*U 334253 4 (78.2, 75.9) P-U*U*U*G*U*C*U*C*2′-F-U*2′-F-G*2′-F-G*U* C*C*U*U*A*C*U*U 335216 13 (64.8, 76.5) P-(MOE)T*dU*(MOE)T*dG*(MOE)T*dC[5Me]* (MOE)T*dC[5Me]*(MOE)T*dG*(MOE)G*dU* (MOE)C[5Me]*dC[5Me]*(MOE)T*dU*(MOE)A* dC[5Me]*(MOE)T*dU 319015 4 (93.5, 77.2) P-U*U*U*G*U*C*U*C*U*G*G*mU*mC*mC*mU* mU*mA*mC*mU*mU 333749 4 (73.3, 77.6) P-U*U*U*G*U*C*U*C*U*G*G*U*C*C*2′-F-U*2′-F- U*2′-F-A*C*U*U 303912 4 (96.5, 79.4) P-U*U*U*G*U*C*U*C*U*G*G*U*C*C* U*U*A*C*U*U 335224 4 (85.7, 79.6) P-U*U*U*G*U*C*U*C*U*G*G*mU*mC* mC*U*U*A*C*U*U 336238 4 (68.6, 79.9) P-U*U*U*G*U*C[5Me]*U*C[5Me]*U*G*G*U* C[5Me]*C[5Me]*U*U*A*C[5Me]*U*U 342852 4 (91.3, 80.7) P-4′-S-U.4′-S-U.4′-S-U.G.4′-S-U.C.U.C.U.G.G.U.C.C.U. 4′-S-U.A.4′-S-C.4′-S-U.4′-S-U 334257 4 (81.1, 81.0) P-2′-F-U*2′-F-U*2′-F-U*G*U*C*U*C*U*G*G* U*C*C*U*U*A*C*U*U 336239 4 (61.2, 81.3) P-U*U*U[5Br]*G*U*C*U*C*U*G*G*U*C* C*U[5Br]*U*A*C*U*U 336240 4 (77.5, 81.4) P-U*U*U*G*U*C*U*2′-F-C*2′-F-U*G*G*2′-F-U*2′-F- C*C*U*U*A*mC*mU*mU 335225 4 (101.8, 81.7) P-U*U*U*G*U*C*U*C*mU*mG*mG*U*C* C*U*U*A*C*U*U 303913 14 (134.7, 82.0) mG*mU*mC*mU*C*U*G*G*U*C*C*U* U*mA*mC*mU*mU 316449 4 (81.9, 82.3) P-U*U*U*G*U*C*U*C*U*G*G*U*C*C*U*U*A*mC* mU*mU 331430 4 (105.0, 82.4) P-(LNA)U*(LNA)U*(LNA)U*G*U*C*U*C* U*G*G*U*C*C*U*U*A*C*U*U 319016 15 (91.2, 84.8) P-U*dT*dT*dG*dT*dC*dT*dC*U*G*G* U*C*C*U*U*A*mC*mU*mU 340569 4 (60.2, 85.0) P-mU.2′-F-U.mU.2′-F-G.mU.2′-F-C.mU.2′-F-C.mU.2′-F- G.mG.2′-F-U.mC.2′-F-C.mU.2′-F-U.mA.2′-F-C.mU.2′-F-U 336676 4 (106.1, 85.4) P-U.U.U.G.U.C.4′-S-U.4′-S-C.4′-S-U.G.G.U. C.C.U.U.A.C.U.U 331694 4 (87.6, 86.0) P-U*U*U*G*U*C*U*C*U*G*G*(LNA)U*(LNA)C* (LNA)C*U*U*A*C*U*U 333750 4 (86.8, 87.5) P-U*U*U*G*U*C*U*C*U*G*G*2′-F-U*2′-F-C*2′-F- C*U*U*A*C*U*U 335117 16 (90.8, 87.6) P-2′-F-U*2′-F-U*2′-F-U*2′-F-G*2′-F-U*2′-F-C*2′-F-U*2′- F-C*2′-F-U*2′-F-C*2′-F-C*2′-F-U*2′-F-U*2′-F-A*2′-F- C*2′-F-U*2′-F-U 319014 4 (98.2, 87.8) P-U*U*U*G*U*C*U*C*U*G*G*U*C*mC* mU*mU*mA*mC*mU*mU 335215 17 (83.7, 88.0) P-dU*(MOE)T*dU*(MOE)G*dU*(MOE)C[5Me]*dU* (MOE)C[5Me]*dU*(MOE)G*dG*(MOE)T*dC[5Me]* (MOE)C[5Me]*dU*(MOE)T*dA*(MOE) C[5Me]*dU*(MOE)T 339923 18 (67.4, 88.2) P-dT.2′-F-U.dT.2′-F-G.dT.2′-F-C.dT.2′-F-C.dT.2′-F- 2′-F-U.dC[5Me]2′-F-C.dT.2′-F-U.dA.2′-F-C.dT.2′-F-U 335217 4 (81.5, 88.5) P-dU*mU*dU*mG*dU*mC*dU*mC*dU*mG*dG* mU*dC*mC*dU*mU*dA*mC*dU*mU 330917 19 (102.2, 88.5) P-U*U*U*G*U*C*U*C*(MOE)T*(MOE)G* (MOE)G*U*C*C*U*U*A*C*U*U 335227 4 (167.1, 88.7) P-U*U*mU*mG*mU*C*U*C*U*G*G*U*C* C*U*U*A*C*U*U 335456 4 (83.3, 88.8) P-mU.U.mU.G.mU.C.mU.C.mU.G.mG.U.m C.C.mU.U.mA.C.mU.U 335220 17 (96.5, 88.8) P-dU.(MOE)T.dU.(MOE)G.dU.(MOE)C[5Me].dU. (MOE)C[5Me].dU.(MOE)G.dG.(MOE)T.dC [5Me].(MOE)C[5Me].dU.(MOE)T.dA. (MOE)C[5Me].dU.(MOE)T 335454 4 (79.2, 89.2) P-mU*U*mU*G*mU*C*mU*C*mU*G*mG*U* mC*C*mU*U*mA*C*mU*U 336674 4 (124.8, 90.0) P-U.U.U.G.U.C.U.C.U.G.G.U.C.C.U.4′-S-U.A.4′-S-C.4′-S- U.4′-S-U 335201 20 (123.2, 92.7) P-dT.(MOE)T.dT.(MOE)G.dT.(MOE)C[5Me].dT. (MOE)C[SMe].dT.(MOE)G.dG.(MOE)T.dC [5Me].(MOE)C[5Me].dT.(MOE)T.dA.(MOE) C[5Me].dT.(MOE)T 328795 4 (66.6, 92.9) P-U*U*U*mG*mU*mC*mU*C*U*G*G* U*C*C*U*U*mA*mC*mU*mU 329391 12 (121.1, 93.5) P-U*U*U*G*U*C*U*C*U*G*G*U*C* C*U*(MOE)U*(MOE)A*(MOE)C[5Me]*(MOE) T*(MOE)T 335449 4 (124.1, 93.7) P-U.U.U.G.U.C.U.C.U.G.G.U.C.C.U.U.A.C.U.U 340571 4 (118.9, 94.2) P-2′-F-U.mU.2′-F-U.mG.2′-F-U.mC.2′-F-U.mC.2′-F- U.mG.2′-F-G.mU.2′-F-C.mC.2′-F-U.mU.2′-F-A.mC.2′-F- U.mU 339924 13 (68.4, 95.5) P-dT*2′-F-U*dT*2′-F-G*dT*2′-F-C*dT*2′-F-C*dT*2′-F- G*dG*2′-F-U*dC[5Me]*2′-F-C*dT*2′-F-U*dA*2′-F- C*dT*2′-F-U 335197 20 (112.4, 96.0) P-dT*(MOE)T*dT*(MOE)G*dT*(MOE)C[5Me] *dT*(MOE)C[5Me]*dT*(MOE)G*dG*(MOE)T *dC[5Me]*(MOE)C[5Me]*dT*(MOE)T*dA *(MOE)C[5Me]*dT*(MOE)T 334469 4 (112.9, 96.8) mU.mU.mU.mG.mU.mC.mU.mC.mU.mG.mG.mU.m C.mC.mU.mU.mA.mC.mU.mU 336671 4 (118.5, 97.5) P-U.U.U.G.U.C.U.C.U.G.G.U.C.C.U.U.A.4′-S-C.4′-S- U.4′-S-U 336672 4 (111.5, 98.3) P-U.U.U.G.U.C.U.C.U.G.G.U.4′-S-C.4′-S-C.4′-S- U.U.A.C.U.U 335209 20 (82.3, 98.9) P*(MOE)T*(MOE)T*(MOE)T*dG*dT*(MOE)C [5Me]*dT*dC[5Me]*(MOE)T*dG*dG*(MOE)T* dC[5Me]*dC[5Me]*(MOE)T*dT*dA*(MOE)C [5Me]*(MOE)T*(MOE)T 330919 21 (71.6, 100.2) P-U*U*(MOE)T*(MOE)G*(MOE)T*C*U*C*U* G*G*U*C*C*U*U*A*C*U*U 335223 4 (129.8, 100.8) P-U*U*U*G*U*C*U*C*U*G*G*U* C*C*mU*mU*mA*C*U*U 303912 4 (102.5, 100.8) P-U*U*U*G*U*C*U*C*U*G*G*U* C*C*U*U*A*C*U*U 335228 4 (119.9, 101.4) P-mU*mU*mU*G*U*C*U*C*U*G*G*U* C*C*U*U*A*C*U*U 335198 20 (104.2, 103.1) P-(MOE)T*dT*(MOE)T*dG*(MOE)T*dC[5Me]* (MOE)T*dC[5Me]*(MOE)T*dG*(MOE)G*dT* (MOE)C[5Me]*dC[5Me]*(MOE)T*dT*(MOE)A* dC[5Me]*(MOE)T*dT 335221 4 (140.8, 103.6) P-dU.mU.dU.mG.dU.mC.dU.mC.dU.mG.dG.m U.dC.mC.dU.mU.dA.mC.dU.mU 336675 4 (155.7, 103.9) P-U.U.U.G.U.C.U.C.U.G.G.U.C.C.U.U.A.C.U.4′-S-U 330997 22 (114.1, 107.0) P-(MOE)T*(MOE)T*(MOE)T*G*U*C*U* C*U*G*G*U*C*C*U*U*A*C*U*U 339925 17 (135.9, 107.0) P-2′-F-U.dT.2′-F-U.dG.2′-F-U.dC[5Me].2′-F- U.dC[5Me].2′-F-U.dG.2′-F-G.dT.2′-F-C.dC[5Me].2′-F- U.dT.2′-F-A.dC[5Me].2′-F-U.dT 328794 4 (85.5, 108.7) P-mU*mU*U*G*U*C*U*C*U*G* G*U*C*C*U*U*A*C*U*U 339926 17 (92.6, 109.5) P-2′-F-U*dT*2′-F-U*dG*2′-F-U*dC[5Me]*2′-F- U*dC[5Me]*2′-F-U*dG*2′-F-G*dT*2′-F-C*dC[5Me]*2′- F-U*dT*2′-F-A*dC[5Me]*2′-F-U*dT 308743 4 (116.4, 110.0) P-mU*mU*mU*G*U*C*U*C*U*G* G*U*C*C*U*U*A*mC*mU*mU 335210 20 (102.4, 110.6) P-(MOE)T.(MOE)T.(MOE)T.dG.dT.(MOE) C[5Me].dT.dC[5Me].(MOE)T.dG.dG.(MOE)T. dC[5Me].dC[5Me].(MOE)T.dT.dA.(MOE)C [5Me].(MOE)T.(MOE)T 334464 4 (130.7, 110.6) 18S.U.U.U.G.U.C.U.C.U.G.G.U.C.C.U.U.A.C.U.U 335457 4 (125.5, 111.9) P-U.mU.U.mG.U.mC.U.mC.U.mG.G.m U.C.mC.U.mU.A.mC.U.mU 336673 4 (118.2, 115.3) P-U.U.U.G.U.C.U.C.U.G.G.4′-S-U.4′-S-C.4′-S- C.U.U.A.C.U.U 335202 20 (152.9, 115.6) P-(MOE)T.dT.(MOE)T.dG.(MOE)T.dC[5Me]. (MOE)T.dC[5Me].(MOE)T.dG.(MOE)G.dT. (MOE)C[5Me].dC[5Me].(MOE)T.dT.(MOE)A. dC[5Me].(MOE)T.dT 335218 4 (91.7, 117.7) P-mU*dU*mU*dG*mU*dC*mU*dC*mU*dG* mG*dU*mC*dC*mU*dU*mA*dC*mU*dU 342851 4 (117.1, 118.1) P-4′-S-U.4′-S-U.4′-S-U.G.4′-S-U.C.U.C.U.G.G.U. C.C.U.4′-S-U.A.4′-S-C.4′-S-U.4′-S-U 335455 4 (140.4, 121.3) P-U*mU*U*mG*U*mC*U*mC*U*mG* G*mU*C*mC*U*mU*A*mC*U*mU 335222 4 (143.4, 129.6) P-mU.dU.mU.dG.mU.dC.mU.dC.mU.dG.mG.dU.m C.dC.mU.dU.mA.dC.mU.dU Legend sugars 2′-OH unless otherwise marked m 2′-O-methyl F 2′-F (MOE) 2′-O—(CH₂)₂—O—CH₃ (LNA) locked nucleic acid 2′-O—CH₂-4′(bicyclic sugar nucleoside) 4′-S 4′-thionucleoside C[5Me] 5-methyl C U[5Br] 5-BromoU period phosphodiester asterick phosphorothioate dN deoxy N (N = G, dG deoxyguanidine) 18s 18 atom peg spacer P- terminal phosphate group

The percent activities shown in brackets under the SEQ ID NO heading list the relative activities for the constructs shown below. The activity for the construct having the 334471 short sense strand is listed first followed by the activity for the construct having the 334472 short sense strand.

Constructs S 5′-3′, AS 3′-5′ 334471 short sense strand XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX antisense strand variable length 334472 short sense strand XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX antisense strand variable length.

Example 4 Activity of Duplex Constructs Having Modified Sense and/or Antisense Strands in Primary Mouse Hepatocytes

The activity of different double strand constructs having short sense strands compared to the antisense strands was determined. The double strand constructs comprised 20 mer antisense strands having one or two 10 mer sense strands hybridized thereto. The study examined three basic motifs having the short sense strand hybridized at the 3′-end, the 5′-end or having 2 short sense strands hybridized one at the 3′-end and one at the 5′-end. The activity of the unmodified antisense strand was compared to various chemically modified antisense strands using the three basic motifs. In addition, modified sense strands were used in place of unmodified sense strands to determine their activities. The study compared these double strand constructs to untreated and positive controls for their ability to inhibit PTEN mRNA levels in primary mouse hepatocytes.

ISIS# SEQ ID No: Sequence 5′-3′ 335449 4(as) P-UUUGUCUCUGGUCCUUACUU 303912 4(as) P-U*U*U*G*U*C*U*C*U*G*G*U*C*C*U*U*A*C*U*U 319022 4(as) P-2′-F-U*2′-F-U*2′-F-U*2′-F-G*2′-F-U*2′-F-C*2′-F-U*2′-F-C*2′ F-U*2′-F-G*2′-F-G*2′-F-U*2′-F-C*2′-F-C*2′-F-U*2′-F-U*2′-F- A*2′-F-C*2′-F-U*2′-F-U 317502 4(as) P-2′-F-U*2′-F-U*2′-F-U*G*2′-F-U*2′-F-C*2′-F-U*C*U*G*G*U* C*2′-F-C*2′-F-U*2′-F-U*A*2′-F-C*2′-F-U*U 308746 1(s) AAGUAAGGACCAGAGACAAA 334471 2(s) AAGUAAGGAC 334472 3(s) CAGAGACAAA 351297 3(s) 2′-F-CAGAGA-2′-F-CAAA 351298 26(s) AGGACCAGAG (control unmodified) 351299 26(s) AGGA-2′-F-C-2′-F-CAGAG (control 2′-F modified) Legend: none = phosphodiester, * = phosphorothioate, 2′-F = 2′-fluorine and P = a 5′-phosphate group.

The percent inhibition of the PTEN mRNA in the assay was measured as a percent of the untreated control which was set at 100%. The relative activities are shown below.

% untreated Antisense strand Sense strand control (100%) 335449 None 70.5 335449 308746 34.4 335449 334471/72 63.1 335449 334471 84.2 335449 334472 79.9 335449 351297 80.7 335449 334471/351297 42.3 335449 351298 92.6 335449 351299 86.3 303912 None 73.3 303912 308746 26.7 303912 351297 64.8 303912 334471/351297 50.4 303912 351298 71.8 303912 351299 87.5 317502 None 96.2 317502 308746 40.5 317502 334471/334472 40.8 317502 334471 83.5 317502 334472 59.4 317502 351297 70.9 317502 334471/351297 43.9 317502 351298 82.7 317502 351299 73.1 319022 None 114.4 319022 308746 58.7 319022 334471 106.8 319022 334472 57.4 319022 351297 83.5 319022 351298 87.9

Example 5 Synthesis of Nucleoside Phosphoramidites

The following compounds, including amidites and their intermediates were prepared as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,426,220 and published PCT WO 02/36743; 5′-O-Dimethoxytrityl-thymidine intermediate for 5-methyl dC amidite, 5′-O-Dimethoxytrityl-2′-deoxy-5-methylcytidine intermediate for 5-methyl-dC amidite, 5′-O-Dimethoxytrityl-2′-deoxy-N4-benzoyl-5-methylcytidine penultimate intermediate for 5-methyl dC amidite, [5′-O-(4,4′-Dimethoxytriphenylmethyl)-2′-deoxy-N⁴-benzoyl-5-methylcytidin-3′-O-yl]-2-cyanoethyl-N,N-diisopropylphosphoramidite (5-methyl dC amidite), 2′-Fluorodeoxyadenosine, 2′-Fluorodeoxyguanosine, 2′-Fluorouridine, 2′-Fluorodeoxycytidine, 2′-O-(2-Methoxyethyl) modified amidites, 2′-O-(2-methoxyethyl)-5-methyluridine intermediate, 5′-O-DMT-2′-O-(2-methoxyethyl)-5-methyluridine penultimate intermediate, [5′-O-(4,4′-Dimethoxytriphenylmethyl)-2′-O-(2-methoxyethyl)-5-methyluridin-3′-O-yl]-2-cyanoethyl-N,N-diisopropylphosphoramidite (MOE T amidite), 5′-O-Dimethoxytrityl-2′-O-(2-methoxyethyl)-5-methylcytidine intermediate, 5′-O-dimethoxytrityl-2′-O-(2-methoxyethyl)-N⁴-benzoyl-5-methyl-cytidine penultimate intermediate, [5′-O-(4,4′-Dimethoxytriphenylmethyl)-2′-O-(2-methoxyethyl)-N⁴-benzoyl-5-methylcytidin-3′-O-yl]-2-cyanoethyl-N,N-diisopropylphosphoramidite (MOE 5-Me-C amidite), [5′-O-(4,4′-Dimethoxytriphenylmethyl)-2′-O-(2-methoxyethyl)-N⁶-benzoyladenosin-3′-O-yl]-2-cyanoethyl-N,N-diisopropylphosphoramidite (MOE A amdite), [5′-O-(4,4′-Dimethoxytriphenylmethyl)-2′-O-(2-methoxyethyl)-N⁴-isobutyrylguanosin-3′-O-yl]-2-cyanoethyl-N,N-diisopropylphosphoramidite (MOE G amidite), 2′-O-(Aminooxyethyl) nucleoside amidites and 2′-O-(dimethylaminooxyethyl) nucleoside amidites, 2′-(Dimethylaminooxyethoxy) nucleoside amidites, 5′-O-tert-Butyldiphenylsilyl-O²-2′-anhydro-5-methyluridine, 5′-O-tert-Butyldiphenylsilyl-2′-O-(2-hydroxyethyl)-5-methyluridine, 2′-O-([2-phthalimidoxy)ethyl]-5′-t-butyldiphenylsilyl-5-methyluridine, 5′-O-tert-butyldiphenylsilyl-2′-O-[(2-formadoximinooxy)ethyl]-5-methyluridine, 5′-O-tert-Butyldiphenylsilyl-2′-O—[N,N dimethylaminooxyethyl]-5-methyluridine, 2′-O-(dimethylaminooxyethyl)-5-methyluridine, 5′-O-DMT-2′-O-(dimethylaminooxyethyl)-5-methyluridine, 5′-O-DMT-2′-O-(2-N,N-dimethylaminooxyethyl)-5-methyluridine-3′-[(2-cyanoethyl)-N,N-diisopropylphosphoramidite], 2′-(Aminooxyethoxy) nucleoside amidites, N2-isobutyryl-6-O-diphenylcarbamoyl-2′-O-(2-ethylacetyl)-5′-O-(4,4′-dimethoxytrityl)guanosine-3′-[(2-cyanoethyl)-N,N-diisopropylphosphoramidite], 2′-dimethylaminoethoxyethoxy (2′-DMAEOE) nucleoside amidites, 2′-O-[2(2-N,N-dimethylaminoethoxy)ethyl]-5-methyl uridine, 5′-O-dimethoxytrityl-2′-O-[2(2-N,N-dimethylaminoethoxy)-ethyl)]-5-methyl uridine and 5′-O-Dimethoxytrityl-2′-O-[2(2-N,N-dimethylaminoethoxy)-ethyl)]-5-methyl uridine-3′-O-(cyanoethyl-N,N-diisopropyl)phosphoramidite.

Example 6 Oligonucleotide and Oligonucleoside Synthesis

The oligomeric compounds used in accordance with this invention may be conveniently and routinely made through the well-known technique of solid phase synthesis. Equipment for such synthesis is sold by several vendors including, for example, Applied Biosystems (Foster City, Calif.). Any other means for such synthesis known in the art may additionally or alternatively be employed. It is well known to use similar techniques to prepare oligonucleotides such as the phosphorothioates and alkylated derivatives.

Oligonucleotides: Unsubstituted and substituted phosphodiester (P═O) oligonucleotides are synthesized on an automated DNA synthesizer (Applied Biosystems model 394) using standard phosphoramidite chemistry with oxidation by iodine.

Phosphorothioates (P═S) are synthesized similar to phosphodiester oligonucleotides with the following exceptions: thiation was effected by utilizing a 10% w/v solution of 3,H-1,2-benzodithiole-3-one 1,1-dioxide in acetonitrile for the oxidation of the phosphite linkages. The thiation reaction step time was increased to 180 sec and preceded by the normal capping step. After cleavage from the CPG column and deblocking in concentrated ammonium hydroxide at 55° C. (12-16 hr), the oligonucleotides were recovered by precipitating with >3 volumes of ethanol from a 1 M NH₄OAc solution. Phosphinate oligonucleotides are prepared as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,508,270, herein incorporated by reference.

Alkyl phosphonate oligonucleotides are prepared as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,469,863, herein incorporated by reference.

3′-Deoxy-3′-methylene phosphonate oligonucleotides are prepared as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,610,289 or 5,625,050, herein incorporated by reference.

Phosphoramidite oligonucleotides are prepared as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,256,775 or U.S. Pat. No. 5,366,878, herein incorporated by reference.

Alkylphosphonothioate oligonucleotides are prepared as described in published PCT applications PCT/US94/00902 and PCT/US93/06976 (published as WO 94/17093 and WO 94/02499, respectively), herein incorporated by reference.

3′-Deoxy-3′-amino phosphoramidite oligonucleotides are prepared as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,476,925, herein incorporated by reference.

Phosphotriester oligonucleotides are prepared as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,023,243, herein incorporated by reference.

Borano phosphate oligonucleotides are prepared as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,130,302 and 5,177,198, both herein incorporated by reference.

Oligonucleosides: Methylenemethylimino linked oligonucleosides, also identified as MMI linked oligonucleosides, methylenedimethylhydrazo linked oligonucleosides, also identified as MDH linked oligonucleosides, and methylenecarbonylamino linked oligonucleosides, also identified as amide-3 linked oligonucleosides, and methyleneaminocarbonyl linked oligonucleosides, also identified as amide-4 linked oligonucleosides, as well as mixed backbone oligomeric compounds having, for instance, alternating MMI and P═O or P═S linkages are prepared as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,378,825, 5,386,023, 5,489,677, 5,602,240 and 5,610,289, all of which are herein incorporated by reference.

Formacetal and thioformacetal linked oligonucleosides are prepared as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,264,562 and 5,264,564, herein incorporated by reference.

Ethylene oxide linked oligonucleosides are prepared as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,223,618, herein incorporated by reference.

Example 7 RNA Synthesis

In general, RNA synthesis chemistry is based on the selective incorporation of various protecting groups at strategic intermediary reactions. Although one of ordinary skill in the art will understand the use of protecting groups in organic synthesis, a useful class of protecting groups includes silyl ethers. In particular bulky silyl ethers are used to protect the 5′-hydroxyl in combination with an acid-labile orthoester protecting group on the 2′-hydroxyl. This set of protecting groups is then used with standard solid-phase synthesis technology. It is important to lastly remove the acid labile orthoester protecting group after all other synthetic steps. Moreover, the early use of the silyl protecting groups during synthesis ensures facile removal when desired, without undesired deprotection of 2′ hydroxyl.

Following this procedure for the sequential protection of the 5′-hydroxyl in combination with protection of the 2′-hydroxyl by protecting groups that are differentially removed and are differentially chemically labile, RNA oligonucleotides were synthesized.

RNA oligonucleotides are synthesized in a stepwise fashion. Each nucleotide is added sequentially (3′- to 5′-direction) to a solid support-bound oligonucleotide. The first nucleoside at the 3′-end of the chain is covalently attached to a solid support. The nucleotide precursor, a ribonucleoside phosphoramidite, and activator are added, coupling the second base onto the 5′-end of the first nucleoside. The support is washed and any unreacted 5′-hydroxyl groups are capped with acetic anhydride to yield 5′-acetyl moieties. The linkage is then oxidized to the more stable and ultimately desired P(V) linkage. At the end of the nucleotide addition cycle, the 5′-silyl group is cleaved with fluoride. The cycle is repeated for each subsequent nucleotide.

Following synthesis, the methyl protecting groups on the phosphates are cleaved in 30 minutes utilizing 1 M disodium-2-carbamoyl-2-cyanoethylene-1,1-dithiolate trihydrate (S₂Na₂) in DMF. The deprotection solution is washed from the solid support-bound oligonucleotide using water. The support is then treated with 40% methylamine in water for 10 minutes at 55° C. This releases the RNA oligonucleotides into solution, deprotects the exocyclic amines, and modifies the 2′-groups. The oligonucleotides can be analyzed by anion exchange HPLC at this stage.

The 2′-orthoester groups are the last protecting groups to be removed. The ethylene glycol monoacetate orthoester protecting group developed by Dharmacon Research, Inc. (Lafayette, Colo.), is one example of a useful orthoester protecting group which, has the following important properties. It is stable to the conditions of nucleoside phosphoramidite synthesis and oligonucleotide synthesis. However, after oligonucleotide synthesis the oligonucleotide is treated with methylamine which not only cleaves the oligonucleotide from the solid support but also removes the acetyl groups from the orthoesters. The resulting 2-ethyl-hydroxyl substituents on the orthoester are less electron withdrawing than the acetylated precursor. As a result, the modified orthoester becomes more labile to acid-catalyzed hydrolysis. Specifically, the rate of cleavage is approximately 10 times faster after the acetyl groups are removed. Therefore, this orthoester possesses sufficient stability in order to be compatible with oligonucleotide synthesis and yet, when subsequently modified, permits deprotection to be carried out under relatively mild aqueous conditions compatible with the final RNA oligonucleotide product.

Additionally, methods of RNA synthesis are well known in the art (Scaringe, S. A. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Colorado, 1996; Scaringe, S. A., et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 11820-11821; Matteucci, M. D. and Caruthers, M. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1981, 103, 3185-3191; Beaucage, S. L. and Caruthers, M. H. Tetrahedron Lett., 1981, 22, 1859-1862; Dahl, B. J., et al., Acta Chem. Scand, 1990, 44, 639-641; Reddy, M. P., et al., Tetrahedrom Lett., 1994, 25, 4311-4314; Wincott, F. et al., Nucleic Acids Res., 1995, 23, 2677-2684; Griffin, B. E., et al., Tetrahedron, 1967, 23, 2301-2313; Griffin, B. E., et al., Tetrahedron, 1967, 23, 2315-2331).

RNA antisense oligomeric compounds (RNA oligonucleotides) of the present invention can be synthesized by the methods herein or purchased from Dharmacon Research, Inc (Lafayette, Colo.). Once synthesized, complementary RNA antisense oligomeric compounds can then be annealed by methods known in the art to form double stranded (duplexed) antisense oligomeric compounds. For example, duplexes can be formed by combining 30 μl of each of the complementary strands of RNA oligonucleotides (50 uM RNA oligonucleotide solution) and 15 μl of 5× annealing buffer (100 mM potassium acetate, 30 mM HEPES-KOH pH 7.4, 2 mM magnesium acetate) followed by heating for 1 minute at 90° C., then 1 hour at 37° C. The resulting duplexed antisense oligomeric compounds can be used in kits, assays, screens, or other methods to investigate the role of a target nucleic acid.

Example 8 Synthesis of Chimeric Oligonucleotides

Chimeric oligonucleotides, oligonucleosides or mixed oligonucleotides/oligonucleosides of the invention can be of several different types. These include a first type wherein the “gap” segment of linked nucleosides is positioned between 5′ and 3′ “wing” segments of linked nucleosides and a second “open end” type wherein the “gap” segment is located at either the 3′ or the 5′ terminus of the oligomeric compound. Oligonucleotides of the first type are also known in the art as “gapmers” or gapped oligonucleotides. Oligonucleotides of the second type are also known in the art as “hemimers” or “wingmers”.

[2′-O-Me]-[2′-deoxy]-[2′-O-Me] Chimeric Phosphorothioate Oligonucleotides

Chimeric oligonucleotides having 2′-O-alkyl phosphorothioate and 2′-deoxy phosphorothioate oligonucleotide segments are synthesized using an Applied Biosystems automated DNA synthesizer Model 394, as above. Oligonucleotides are synthesized using the automated synthesizer and 2′-deoxy-5′-dimethoxytrityl-3′-O-phosphoramidite for the DNA portion and 5′-dimethoxytrityl-2′-O-methyl-3′-O-phosphoramidite for 5′ and 3′ wings. The standard synthesis cycle is modified by incorporating coupling steps with increased reaction times for the 5′-dimethoxytrityl-2′-O-methyl-3′-O-phosphoramidite. The fully protected oligonucleotide is cleaved from the support and deprotected in concentrated ammonia (NH₄OH) for 12-16 hr at 55° C. The deprotected oligo is then recovered by an appropriate method (precipitation, column chromatography, volume reduced in vacuo and analyzed spetrophotometrically for yield and for purity by capillary electrophoresis and by mass spectrometry.

[2′-O-(2-Methoxyethyl)]-[2′-deoxy]-[2′-O-(Methoxyethyl)] Chimeric Phosphorothioate Oligonucleotides

[2′-O-(2-methoxyethyl)]-[2′-deoxy]-[2′-O-(methoxyethyl)] chimeric phosphorothioate oligonucleotides were prepared as per the procedure above for the 2′-O-methyl chimeric oligonucleotide, with the substitution of 2′-O-(methoxyethyl) amidites for the 2′-O-methyl amidites. [2′-O-(2-Methoxyethyl)Phosphodiester]-[2′-deoxy Phosphorothioate]-[2′-O-(2-Methoxyethyl)Phosphodiester] Chimeric Oligonucleotides

[2′-O-(2-methoxyethyl phosphodiester]-[2′-deoxy phosphorothioate]-[2′-O-(methoxyethyl)phosphodiester] chimeric oligonucleotides are prepared as per the above procedure for the 2′-O-methyl chimeric oligonucleotide with the substitution of 2′-O-(methoxyethyl) amidites for the 2′-O-methyl amidites, oxidation with iodine to generate the phosphodiester internucleotide linkages within the wing portions of the chimeric structures and sulfurization utilizing 3,H-1,2 benzodithiole-3-one 1,1 dioxide (Beaucage Reagent) to generate the phosphorothioate internucleotide linkages for the center gap.

Other chimeric oligonucleotides, chimeric oligonucleosides and mixed chimeric oligonucleotides/oligonucleosides are synthesized according to U.S. Pat. No. 5,623,065, herein incorporated by reference.

Example 9 Design and Screening of Duplexed Antisense Oligomeric Compounds Directed to a Selected Target

In accordance with the present invention, a series of nucleic acid duplexes comprising the antisense oligomeric compounds of the present invention and their complements can be designed to target a target. The ends of the strands may be modified by the addition of one or more natural or modified nucleobases to form an overhang. The sense strand of the dsRNA is then designed and synthesized as the complement of the antisense strand and may also contain modifications or additions to either terminus. For example, in one embodiment, both strands of the dsRNA duplex would be complementary over the central nucleobases, each having overhangs at one or both termini.

For example, a duplex comprising an antisense strand having the sequence CGAGAGGCGGACGGGACCG and having a two-nucleobase overhang of deoxythymidine (dT) would have the following structure:

  cgagaggcggacgggaccgTT antisense strand   ||||||||||||||||||| TTgctctccgcctgccctggc complementary sense strand

RNA strands of the duplex can be synthesized by methods disclosed herein or purchased from Dharmacon Research Inc., (Lafayette, Colo.). Once synthesized, the complementary strands are annealed. The single strands are aliquoted and diluted to a concentration of 50 uM. Once diluted, 30 uL of each strand is combined with 15 uL of a 5× solution of annealing buffer. The final concentration of said buffer is 100 mM potassium acetate, 30 mM HEPES-KOH pH 7.4, and 2 mM magnesium acetate. The final volume is 75 uL. This solution is incubated for 1 minute at 90° C. and then centrifuged for 15 seconds. The tube is allowed to sit for 1 hour at 37° C. at which time the dsRNA duplexes are used in experimentation. The final concentration of the dsRNA duplex is 20 uM. This solution can be stored frozen (−20° C.) and freeze-thawed up to 5 times.

Once prepared, the duplexed antisense oligomeric compounds are evaluated for their ability to modulate a target expression.

When cells reached 80% confluency, they are treated with duplexed antisense oligomeric compounds of the invention. For cells grown in 96-well plates, wells are washed once with 200 μL OPTI-MEM-1 reduced-serum medium (Gibco BRL) and then treated with 130 μL of OPTI-MEM-1 containing 12 μg/mL LIPOFECTIN (Gibco BRL) and the desired duplex antisense oligomeric compound at a final concentration of 200 nM. After 5 hours of treatment, the medium is replaced with fresh medium. Cells are harvested 16 hours after treatment, at which time RNA is isolated and target reduction measured by RT-PCR.

Example 10 Oligonucleotide Isolation

After cleavage from the controlled pore glass solid support and deblocking in concentrated ammonium hydroxide at 55° C. for 12-16 hours, the oligonucleotides or oligonucleosides are recovered by precipitation out of 1 M NH₄OAc with >3 volumes of ethanol. Synthesized oligonucleotides were analyzed by electrospray mass spectroscopy (molecular weight determination) and by capillary gel electrophoresis and judged to be at least 70% full length material. The relative amounts of phosphorothioate and phosphodiester linkages obtained in the synthesis was determined by the ratio of correct molecular weight relative to the −16 amu product (±32±48). For some studies oligonucleotides were purified by HPLC, as described by Chiang et al., J. Biol. Chem. 1991, 266, 18162-18171. Results obtained with HPLC-purified material were similar to those obtained with non-HPLC purified material.

Example 11 Oligonucleotide Synthesis-96 Well Plate Format

Oligonucleotides were synthesized via solid phase P(III) phosphoramidite chemistry on an automated synthesizer capable of assembling 96 sequences simultaneously in a 96-well format. Phosphodiester internucleotide linkages were afforded by oxidation with aqueous iodine. Phosphorothioate internucleotide linkages were generated by sulfurization utilizing 3,H-1,2 benzodithiole-3-one 1,1 dioxide (Beaucage Reagent) in anhydrous acetonitrile. Standard base-protected beta-cyanoethyl-diiso-propyl phosphoramidites were purchased from commercial vendors (e.g. PE-Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif., or Pharmacia, Piscataway, N.J.). Non-standard nucleosides are synthesized as per standard or patented methods. They are utilized as base protected beta-cyanoethyldiisopropyl phosphoramidites.

Oligonucleotides were cleaved from support and deprotected with concentrated NH₄OH at elevated temperature (55-60° C.) for 12-16 hours and the released product then dried in vacuo. The dried product was then re-suspended in sterile water to afford a master plate from which all analytical and test plate samples are then diluted utilizing robotic pipettors.

Example 12 Oligonucleotide Analysis Using 96-Well Plate Format

The concentration of oligonucleotide in each well was assessed by dilution of samples and UV absorption spectroscopy. The full-length integrity of the individual products was evaluated by capillary electrophoresis (CE) in either the 96-well format (Beckman P/ACE™ MDQ) or, for individually prepared samples, on a commercial CE apparatus (e.g., Beckman P/ACE™ 5000, ABI 270). Base and backbone composition was confirmed by mass analysis of the oligomeric compounds utilizing electrospray-mass spectroscopy. All assay test plates were diluted from the master plate using single and multi-channel robotic pipettors. Plates were judged to be acceptable if at least 85% of the oligomeric compounds on the plate were at least 85% full length.

Example 13 Cell Culture and Oligonucleotide Treatment

The effect of oligomeric compounds on target nucleic acid expression can be tested in any of a variety of cell types provided that the target nucleic acid is present at measurable levels. This can be routinely determined using, for example, PCR or Northern blot analysis. The following cell types are provided for illustrative purposes, but other cell types can be routinely used, provided that the target is expressed in the cell type chosen. This can be readily determined by methods routine in the art, for example Northern blot analysis, ribonuclease protection assays, or RT-PCR.

T-24 Cells:

The human transitional cell bladder carcinoma cell line T-24 was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) (Manassas, Va.). T-24 cells were routinely cultured in complete McCoy's 5A basal media (Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad, Calif.) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad, Calif.), penicillin 100 units per mL, and streptomycin 100 micrograms per mL (Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad, Calif.). Cells were routinely passaged by trypsinization and dilution when they reached 90% confluence. Cells were seeded into 96-well plates (Falcon-Primaria #353872) at a density of 7000 cells/well for use in RT-PCR analysis.

For Northern blotting or other analysis, cells may be seeded onto 100 mm or other standard tissue culture plates and treated similarly, using appropriate volumes of medium and oligonucleotide.

A549 Cells:

The human lung carcinoma cell line A549 was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) (Manassas, Va.). A549 cells were routinely cultured in DMEM basal media (Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad, Calif.) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad, Calif.), penicillin 100 units per mL, and streptomycin 100 micrograms per mL (Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad, Calif.). Cells were routinely passaged by trypsinization and dilution when they reached 90% confluence.

NHDF Cells:

Human neonatal dermal fibroblast (NHDF) were obtained from the Clonetics Corporation (Walkersville, Md.). NHDFs were routinely maintained in Fibroblast Growth Medium (Clonetics Corporation, Walkersville, Md.) supplemented as recommended by the supplier. Cells were maintained for up to 10 passages as recommended by the supplier.

HEK Cells:

Human embryonic keratinocytes (HEK) were obtained from the Clonetics Corporation (Walkersville, Md.). HEKs were routinely maintained in Keratinocyte Growth Medium (Clonetics Corporation, Walkersville, Md.) formulated as recommended by the supplier. Cells were routinely maintained for up to 10 passages as recommended by the supplier.

Treatment with Oligomeric Compounds:

When cells reached 65-75% confluency, they were treated with oligonucleotide. For cells grown in 96-well plates, wells were washed once with 100 μL OPTI-MEM™-1 reduced-serum medium (Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad, Calif.) and then treated with 130 μL of OPTI-MEM-1 containing 3.75 μg/mL LIPOFECTIN™ (Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad, Calif.) and the desired concentration of oligonucleotide. Cells are treated and data are obtained in triplicate. After 4-7 hours of treatment at 37° C., the medium was replaced with fresh medium. Cells were harvested 16-24 hours after oligonucleotide treatment.

The concentration of oligonucleotide used varies from cell line to cell line. To determine the optimal oligonucleotide concentration for a particular cell line, the cells are treated with a positive control oligonucleotide at a range of concentrations. For human cells the positive control oligonucleotide is selected from either ISIS 13920 (TCCGTCATCGCTCCTCAGGG, SEQ ID NO: 23, full P═S, gaps are deoxy) which is targeted to human H-ras, or ISIS 18078, (GTGCGCGCGA-GCCCGAAATC, SEQ ID NO: 24, full P═S) which is targeted to human Jun-N-terminal kinase-2 (JNK2). Both controls are 2′-O-methoxyethyl gapmers (2′-O-methoxyethyls shown in bold 3/9/8 and 5/9/6 respectively) with a phosphorothioate backbone. For mouse or rat cells the positive control oligonucleotide is ISIS 15770, ATGCATTCTGCCCCCAAGGA, SEQ ID NO: 25, a 2′-O-methoxyethyl gapmer (2′-O-methoxyethyls shown in bold, full P═S, 5/10/5) with a phosphorothioate backbone which is targeted to both mouse and rat c-raf. The concentration of positive control oligonucleotide that results in 80% inhibition of c-H-ras (for ISIS 13920), JNK2 (for ISIS 18078) or c-raf (for ISIS 15770) mRNA is then utilized as the screening concentration for new oligonucleotides in subsequent experiments for that cell line. If 80% inhibition is not achieved, the lowest concentration of positive control oligonucleotide that results in 60% inhibition of c-H-ras, JNK2 or c-raf mRNA is then utilized as the oligonucleotide screening concentration in subsequent experiments for that cell line. If 60% inhibition is not achieved, that particular cell line is deemed as unsuitable for oligonucleotide transfection experiments. The concentrations of antisense oligonucleotides used herein are from 50 nM to 300 nM.

Example 14 Analysis of Oligonucleotide Inhibition of a Target Expression

Antisense modulation of a target expression can be assayed in a variety of ways known in the art. For example, a target mRNA levels can be quantitated by, e.g., Northern blot analysis, competitive polymerase chain reaction (PCR), or real-time PCR (RT-PCR). Real-time quantitative PCR is presently preferred. RNA analysis can be performed on total cellular RNA or poly(A)+ mRNA. The preferred method of RNA analysis of the present invention is the use of total cellular RNA as described in other examples herein. Methods of RNA isolation are well known in the art. Northern blot analysis is also routine in the art. Real-time quantitative (PCR) can be conveniently accomplished using the commercially available ABI PRISM™ 7600, 7700, or 7900 Sequence Detection System, available from PE-Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif. and used according to manufacturer's instructions.

Protein levels of a target can be quantitated in a variety of ways well known in the art, such as immunoprecipitation, Western blot analysis (immunoblotting), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). Antibodies directed to a target can be identified and obtained from a variety of sources, such as the MSRS catalog of antibodies (Aerie Corporation, Birmingham, Mich.), or can be prepared via conventional monoclonal or polyclonal antibody generation methods well known in the art.

Example 15 Design of Phenotypic Assays and In Vivo Studies for the Use of a Target Inhibitors Phenotypic Assays

Once a target inhibitors have been identified by the methods disclosed herein, the oligomeric compounds are further investigated in one or more phenotypic assays, each having measurable endpoints predictive of efficacy in the treatment of a particular disease state or condition.

Phenotypic assays, kits and reagents for their use are well known to those skilled in the art and are herein used to investigate the role and/or association of a target in health and disease. Representative phenotypic assays, which can be purchased from any one of several commercial vendors, include those for determining cell viability, cytotoxicity, proliferation or cell survival (Molecular Probes, Eugene, Oreg.; PerkinElmer, Boston, Mass.), protein-based assays including enzymatic assays (Panvera, LLC, Madison, Wis.; BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, N.J.; Oncogene Research Products, San Diego, Calif.), cell regulation, signal transduction, inflammation, oxidative processes and apoptosis (Assay Designs Inc., Ann Arbor, Mich.), triglyceride accumulation (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Mo.), angiogenesis assays, tube formation assays, cytokine and hormone assays and metabolic assays (Chemicon International Inc., Temecula, Calif.; Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, N.J.).

In one non-limiting example, cells determined to be appropriate for a particular phenotypic assay (i.e., MCF-7 cells selected for breast cancer studies; adipocytes for obesity studies) are treated with a target inhibitors identified from the in vitro studies as well as control compounds at optimal concentrations which are determined by the methods described above. At the end of the treatment period, treated and untreated cells are analyzed by one or more methods specific for the assay to determine phenotypic outcomes and endpoints.

Phenotypic endpoints include changes in cell morphology over time or treatment dose as well as changes in levels of cellular components such as proteins, lipids, nucleic acids, hormones, saccharides or metals. Measurements of cellular status which include pH, stage of the cell cycle, intake or excretion of biological indicators by the cell, are also endpoints of interest.

Analysis of the geneotype of the cell (measurement of the expression of one or more of the genes of the cell) after treatment is also used as an indicator of the efficacy or potency of the a target inhibitors. Hallmark genes, or those genes suspected to be associated with a specific disease state, condition, or phenotype, are measured in both treated and untreated cells.

In Vivo Studies

The individual subjects of the in vivo studies described herein are warm-blooded vertebrate animals, which includes humans.

The clinical trial is subjected to rigorous controls to ensure that individuals are not unnecessarily put at risk and that they are fully informed about their role in the study.

To account for the psychological effects of receiving treatments, volunteers are randomly given placebo or a target inhibitor. Furthermore, to prevent the doctors from being biased in treatments, they are not informed as to whether the medication they are administering is a a target inhibitor or a placebo. Using this randomization approach, each volunteer has the same chance of being given either the new treatment or the placebo.

Volunteers receive either the a target inhibitor or placebo for eight week period with biological parameters associated with the indicated disease state or condition being measured at the beginning (baseline measurements before any treatment), end (after the final treatment), and at regular intervals during the study period. Such measurements include the levels of nucleic acid molecules encoding a target or a target protein levels in body fluids, tissues or organs compared to pre-treatment levels. Other measurements include, but are not limited to, indices of the disease state or condition being treated, body weight, blood pressure, serum titers of pharmacologic indicators of disease or toxicity as well as ADME (absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion) measurements. Information recorded for each patient includes age (years), gender, height (cm), family history of disease state or condition (yes/no), motivation rating (some/moderate/great) and number and type of previous treatment regimens for the indicated disease or condition.

Volunteers taking part in this study are healthy adults (age 18 to 65 years) and roughly an equal number of males and females participate in the study. Volunteers with certain characteristics are equally distributed for placebo and a target inhibitor treatment. In general, the volunteers treated with placebo have little or no response to treatment, whereas the volunteers treated with the a target inhibitor show positive trends in their disease state or condition index at the conclusion of the study.

Example 16 RNA Isolation

Poly(A)+ mRNA Isolation

Poly(A)+ mRNA was isolated according to Miura et al., (Clin. Chem., 1996, 42, 1758-1764). Other methods for poly(A)+ mRNA isolation are routine in the art. Briefly, for cells grown on 96-well plates, growth medium was removed from the cells and each well was washed with 200 μL cold PBS. 60 μL lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5 M NaCl, 0.5% NP-40, 20 mM vanadyl-ribonucleoside complex) was added to each well, the plate was gently agitated and then incubated at room temperature for five minutes. 55 μL of lysate was transferred to Oligo d(T) coated 96-well plates (AGCT Inc., Irvine Calif.). Plates were incubated for 60 minutes at room temperature, washed 3 times with 200 μL of wash buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.6, 1 mM EDTA, 0.3 M NaCl). After the final wash, the plate was blotted on paper towels to remove excess wash buffer and then air-dried for 5 minutes. 60 μL of elution buffer (5 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.6), preheated to 70° C., was added to each well, the plate was incubated on a 90° C. hot plate for 5 minutes, and the eluate was then transferred to a fresh 96-well plate.

Cells grown on 100 mm or other standard plates may be treated similarly, using appropriate volumes of all solutions.

Total RNA Isolation

Total RNA was isolated using an RNEASY 96™ kit and buffers purchased from Qiagen Inc. (Valencia, Calif.) following the manufacturer's recommended procedures. Briefly, for cells grown on 96-well plates, growth medium was removed from the cells and each well was washed with 200 μL cold PBS. 150 μL Buffer RLT was added to each well and the plate vigorously agitated for 20 seconds. 150 μL of 70% ethanol was then added to each well and the contents mixed by pipetting three times up and down. The samples were then transferred to the RNEASY 96™ well plate attached to a QIAVAC™ manifold fitted with a waste collection tray and attached to a vacuum source. Vacuum was applied for 1 minute. 500 μL of Buffer RW1 was added to each well of the RNEASY 96™ plate and incubated for 15 minutes and the vacuum was again applied for 1 minute. An additional 500 μL of Buffer RW1 was added to each well of the RNEASY 96™ plate and the vacuum was applied for 2 minutes. 1 mL of Buffer RPE was then added to each well of the RNEASY 96™ plate and the vacuum applied for a period of 90 seconds. The Buffer RPE wash was then repeated and the vacuum was applied for an additional 3 minutes. The plate was then removed from the QIAVAC™ manifold and blotted dry on paper towels. The plate was then re-attached to the QIAVAC™ manifold fitted with a collection tube rack containing 1.2 mL collection tubes. RNA was then eluted by pipetting 140 μL of RNAse free water into each well, incubating 1 minute, and then applying the vacuum for 3 minutes.

The repetitive pipetting and elution steps may be automated using a QIAGEN Bio-Robot 9604 (Qiagen, Inc., Valencia Calif.). Essentially, after lysing of the cells on the culture plate, the plate is transferred to the robot deck where the pipetting, DNase treatment and elution steps are carried out.

Example 17 Real-Time Quantitative PCR Analysis of a Target mRNA Levels

Quantitation of a target mRNA levels was accomplished by real-time quantitative PCR using the ABI PRISM™ 7600, 7700, or 7900 Sequence Detection System (PE-Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.) according to manufacturer's instructions. This is a closed-tube, non-gel-based, fluorescence detection system which allows high-throughput quantitation of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products in real-time. As opposed to standard PCR in which amplification products are quantitated after the PCR is completed, products in real-time quantitative PCR are quantitated as they accumulate. This is accomplished by including in the PCR reaction an oligonucleotide probe that anneals specifically between the forward and reverse PCR primers, and contains two fluorescent dyes. A reporter dye (e.g., FAM or JOE, obtained from either PE-Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif., Operon Technologies Inc., Alameda, Calif. or Integrated DNA Technologies Inc., Coralville, Iowa) is attached to the 5′ end of the probe and a quencher dye (e.g., TAMRA, obtained from either PE-Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif., Operon Technologies Inc., Alameda, Calif. or Integrated DNA Technologies Inc., Coralville, Iowa) is attached to the 3′ end of the probe. When the probe and dyes are intact, reporter dye emission is quenched by the proximity of the 3′ quencher dye. During amplification, annealing of the probe to the target sequence creates a substrate that can be cleaved by the 5′-exonuclease activity of Taq polymerase. During the extension phase of the PCR amplification cycle, cleavage of the probe by Taq polymerase releases the reporter dye from the remainder of the probe (and hence from the quencher moiety) and a sequence-specific fluorescent signal is generated. With each cycle, additional reporter dye molecules are cleaved from their respective probes, and the fluorescence intensity is monitored at regular intervals by laser optics built into the ABI PRISM™ Sequence Detection System. In each assay, a series of parallel reactions containing serial dilutions of mRNA from untreated control samples generates a standard curve that is used to quantitate the percent inhibition after antisense oligonucleotide treatment of test samples.

Prior to quantitative PCR analysis, primer-probe sets specific to the target gene being measured are evaluated for their ability to be “multiplexed” with a GAPDH amplification reaction. In multiplexing, both the target gene and the internal standard gene GAPDH are amplified concurrently in a single sample. In this analysis, mRNA isolated from untreated cells is serially diluted. Each dilution is amplified in the presence of primer-probe sets specific for GAPDH only, target gene only (“single-plexing”), or both (multiplexing). Following PCR amplification, standard curves of GAPDH and target mRNA signal as a function of dilution are generated from both the single-plexed and multiplexed samples. If both the slope and correlation coefficient of the GAPDH and target signals generated from the multiplexed samples fall within 10% of their corresponding values generated from the single-plexed samples, the primer-probe set specific for that target is deemed multiplexable. Other methods of PCR are also known in the art.

PCR reagents were obtained from Invitrogen Corporation, (Carlsbad, Calif.). RT-PCR reactions were carried out by adding 20 μL PCR cocktail (2.5× PCR buffer minus MgCl₂, 6.6 mM MgCl₂, 375 μM each of dATP, dCTP, dCTP and dGTP, 375 nM each of forward primer and reverse primer, 125 nM of probe, 4 Units RNAse inhibitor, 1.25 Units PLATINUM™ Taq, 5 Units MuLV reverse transcriptase, and 2.5× ROX dye) to 96-well plates containing 30 μL total RNA solution (20-200 ng). The RT reaction was carried out by incubation for 30 minutes at 48° C. Following a 10 minute incubation at 95° C. to activate the PLATINUM® Taq, 40 cycles of a two-step PCR protocol were carried out: 95° C. for 15 seconds (denaturation) followed by 60° C. for 1.5 minutes (annealing/extension).

Gene target quantities obtained by real time RT-PCR are normalized using either the expression level of GAPDH, a gene whose expression is constant, or by quantifying total RNA using RiboGreen™ (Molecular Probes, Inc. Eugene, Oreg.). GAPDH expression is quantified by real time RT-PCR, by being run simultaneously with the target, multiplexing, or separately. Total RNA is quantified using RiboGreen™ RNA quantification reagent (Molecular Probes, Inc. Eugene, Oreg.). Methods of RNA quantification by RiboGreen™ are taught in Jones, L. J., et al, (Analytical Biochemistry, 1998, 265, 368-374).

In this assay, 170 μL of RiboGreen™ working reagent (RiboGreen™ reagent diluted 1:350 in 10 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.5) is pipetted into a 96-well plate containing 30 μL purified, cellular RNA. The plate is read in a CytoFluor 4000 (PE Applied Biosystems) with excitation at 485 nm and emission at 530 nm.

Probes and are designed to hybridize to a human a target sequence, using published sequence information.

Example 18 Northern Blot Analysis of a Target mRNA Levels

Eighteen hours after antisense treatment, cell monolayers were washed twice with cold PBS and lysed in 1 mL RNAZOL™ (TEL-TEST “B” Inc., Friendswood, Tex.). Total RNA was prepared following manufacturer's recommended protocols. Twenty micrograms of total RNA was fractionated by electrophoresis through 1.2% agarose gels containing 1.1% formaldehyde using a MOPS buffer system (AMRESCO, Inc. Solon, Ohio). RNA was transferred from the gel to HYBOND™-N+ nylon membranes (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, N.J.) by overnight capillary transfer using a Northern/Southern Transfer buffer system (TEL-TEST “B” Inc., Friendswood, Tex.). RNA transfer was confirmed by UV visualization. Membranes were fixed by UV cross-linking using a STRATALINKER™ UV Crosslinker 2400 (Stratagene, Inc, La Jolla, Calif.) and then probed using QUICKHYB™ hybridization solution (Stratagene, La Jolla, Calif.) using manufacturer's recommendations for stringent conditions.

To detect human a target, a human a target specific primer probe set is prepared by PCR To normalize for variations in loading and transfer efficiency membranes are stripped and probed for human glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) RNA (Clontech, Palo Alto, Calif.).

Hybridized membranes were visualized and quantitated using a PHOSPHORIMAGER™ and IMAGEQUANT™ Software V3.3 (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, Calif.). Data was normalized to GAPDH levels in untreated controls.

Example 19 Inhibition of Human a Target Expression by Oligomeric Compounds

In accordance with the present invention, a series of oligomeric compounds are designed to target different regions of the human target RNA. The oligomeric compounds are analyzed for their effect on human target mRNA levels by quantitative real-time PCR as described in other examples herein. Data are averages from three experiments. The target regions to which these preferred sequences are complementary are herein referred to as “preferred target segments” and are therefore preferred for targeting by oligomeric compounds of the present invention. The sequences represent the reverse complement of the preferred oligomeric compounds.

As these “preferred target segments” have been found by experimentation to be open to, and accessible for, hybridization with the oligomeric compounds of the present invention, one of skill in the art will recognize or be able to ascertain, using no more than routine experimentation, further embodiments of the invention that encompass other oligomeric compounds that specifically hybridize to these preferred target segments and consequently inhibit the expression of a target.

According to the present invention, oligomeric compounds include antisense oligomeric compounds, antisense oligonucleotides, ribozymes, external guide sequence (EGS) oligonucleotides, alternate splicers, primers, probes, and other short oligomeric compounds which hybridize to at least a portion of the target nucleic acid.

Example 20 Western Blot Analysis of Target Protein Levels

Western blot analysis (immunoblot analysis) is carried out using standard methods. Cells are harvested 16-20 h after oligonucleotide treatment, washed once with PBS, suspended in Laemmli buffer (100 ul/well), boiled for 5 minutes and loaded on a 16% SDS-PAGE gel. Gels are run for 1.5 hours at 150 V, and transferred to membrane for western blotting. Appropriate primary antibody directed to a target is used, with a radiolabeled or fluorescently labeled secondary antibody directed against the primary antibody species. Bands are visualized using a PHOSPHORIMAGER™ (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale Calif.).

Example 21 Representative Cell Lines

HuVEC Cells:

The human umbilical vein endothilial cell line HuVEC was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, Va.). HuVEC cells were routinely cultured in EBM (Clonetics Corporation Walkersville, Md.) supplemented with SingleQuots supplements (Clonetics Corporation, Walkersville, Md.). Cells were routinely passaged by trypsinization and dilution when they reached 90% confluence were maintained for up to 15 passages. Cells were seeded into 96-well plates (Falcon-Primaria #3872) at a density of 10000 cells/well for use in RT-PCR analysis.

For Northern blotting or other analyses, cells may be seeded onto 100 mm or other standard tissue culture plates and treated similarly, using appropriate volumes of medium and oligonucleotide.

MCF-7 Cells

The human breast carcinoma cell line MCF-7 is obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, Va.). These cells contain a wild-type p53 gene. MCF-7 cells are routinely cultured in DMEM low glucose (Gibco/Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, Md.) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (Gibco/Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, Md.). Cells are routinely passaged by trypsinization and dilution when they reach 90% confluence. Cells are seeded into 96-well plates (Falcon-Primaria #3872) at a density of 7000 cells/well for treatment with the oligomeric compounds of the invention.

HepB3 Cells

The human hepatoma cell line HepB3 (Hep3B2.1-7) is obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC-ATCC Catalog # HB-8064) (Manassas, Va.). This cell line was initially derived from a hepatocellular carcinoma of an 8-yr-old black male. The cells are epithelial in morphology and are tumorigenic in nude mice. HepB3 cells are routinely cultured in Minimum Essential Medium (MEM) with Earle's Balanced Salt Solution, 2 mM L-glutamine, 1.5 g/L sodium bicarbonate, 0.1 mM nonessential amino acids, 1.0 mM sodium pyruvate (ATCC #20-2003, Manassas, Va.) and with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Gibco/Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, Md.). Cells are routinely passaged by trypsinization and dilution when they reach 90% confluence.

T-24 Cells

The transitional cell bladder carcinoma cell line T-24 is obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) (Manassas, Va.). T-24 cells are routinely cultured in complete McCoy's 5A basal media (Gibco/Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, Md.) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (Gibco/Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, Md.), penicillin 100 units per mL, and streptomycin 100 μg/mL (Gibco/Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, Md.). Cells are routinely passaged by trypsinization and dilution when they reach 90% confluence. Cells are seeded into 96-well plates (Falcon-Primaria #3872) at a density of 7000 cells/well for treatment with the compound of the invention.

A549 Cells

The human lung carcinoma cell line A549 is obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) (Manassas, Va.). A549 cells are routinely cultured in DMEM basal media (Gibco/Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, Md.) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (Gibco/Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, Md.), penicillin 100 units per mL, and streptomycin 100 μg/mL (Gibco/Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, Md.). Cells are routinely passaged by trysinization and dilution when they reach 90% confluence. Cells are seeded into 96-well plates (Falcon-Primaria #3872) at a density of 7000 cells/well for treatment with the compound of the invention.

Primary Mouse Hepatocytes

Primary mouse hepatocytes are prepared from CD-1 mice purchased from Charles River Labs. Primary mouse hepatocytes are routinely cultured in Hepatocyte Attachment Media (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, Calif.) supplemented with 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, Calif.), 250 nM dexamethasone (Sigma-Aldrich Corporation, St. Louis, Mo.), 10 nM bovine insulin (Sigma-Aldrich Corporation, St. Louis, Mo.). Cells are seeded into 96-well plates (Falcon-Primaria #353872, BD Biosciences, Bedford, Mass.) at a density of 4000-6000 cells/well for treatment with the oligomeric compounds of the invention.

Example 22 Liposome-Mediated Treatment with Oligomeric Compounds of the Invention

When cells reach the desired confluency, they can be treated with the oligomeric compounds of the invention by liposome-mediated transfection. For cells grown in 96-well plates, wells are washed once with 200 μL OPTI-MEM™-1 reduced-serum medium (Gibco BRL) and then treated with 100 μL of OPTI-MEM™-1 containing 2.5 μg/mL LIPOFECTIN™ (Gibco BRL) and the oligomeric compounds of the invention at the desired final concentration. After 4 hours of treatment, the medium is replaced with fresh medium. Cells are harvested 16 hours after treatment with the oligomeric compounds of the invention for target mRNA expression analysis by real-time PCR.

Example 23 Electroporation-Mediated Treatment with Oligomeric Compounds of the Invention

When the cells reach the desired confluency, they can be treated with the oligomeric compounds of the invention by electorporation. Cells are electroporated in the presence of the desired concentration of an oligomeric compound of the invention in 1 mm cuvettes at a density of 1×10⁷ cells/mL, a voltage of 75V and a pulse length of 6 ms. Following the delivery of the electrical pulse, cells are replated for 16 to 24 hours. Cells are then harvested for target mRNA expression analysis by real-time PCR.

Example 24 Apoptosis Assay

Caspase-3 activity is evaluated with an fluorometric HTS Caspase-3 assay (Oncogene Research Products, San Diego, Calif.) that detects cleavage after aspartate residues in the peptide sequence (DEVD). The DEVD substrate is labeled with a fluorescent molecule, which exhibits a blue to green shift in fluorescence upon cleavage. Active caspase-3 in treated cells is measured by this assay according to the manufacturer's instructions. Following treatment with the oligomeric compounds of the invention, 50 μL of assay buffer is added to each well, followed by addition 20 μL of the caspase-3 fluorescent substrate conjugate. Data are obtained in triplicate. Fluorescence in wells is immediately detected (excitation/emission 400/505 nm) using a fluorescent plate reader (SpectraMAX GeminiXS, Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, Calif.). The plate is covered and incubated at 37° C. for an additional three hours, after which the fluorescence is again measured (excitation/emission 400/505 nm). The value at time zero is subtracted from the measurement obtained at 3 hours. The measurement obtained from the untreated control cells is designated as 100% activity.

Example 25 Cell Proliferation and Viability Assay

Cell viability and proliferation are measured using the CyQuant Cell Proliferation Assay Kit (Molecular Probes, Eugene, Oreg.) utilizing the CyQuant GR green fluorescent dye which exhibits strong fluorescence enhancement when bound to cellular nucleic acids. The assay is performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. After the treatment with one or more oligomeric compounds of the invention, the microplate is gently inverted to remove the medium from the wells, which are each washed once with 200 μL of phosphate-buffered saline. Plates are frozen at −70° C. and then thawed. A volume of 200 μL of the CyQUANT GR dye/cell-lysis buffer is added to each well. The microplate is incubated for 5 minutes at room temperature, protected from light. Data are obtained in triplicate. Fluorescence in wells is immediately detected (excitation/emission 480/520 nm) using a fluorescent plate reader (SpectraMAX GeminiXS, Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, Calif.). The measurement obtained from the untreated control cells is designated as 100% activity. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A composition comprising an antisense oligomeric compound and two sense oligomeric compounds wherein: each of the sense oligomeric compounds is complementary to a separate region of the antisense oligomeric compound and one of the sense oligomeric compounds forms a duplex region with the antisense oligomeric compound starting at the 5′-end of the antisense oligomeric compound and the other of the sense oligomeric compounds forms a duplex region with the antisense oligomeric compound starting at the 3′-end of the antisense oligomeric compound, and the duplex regions are separate and non-overlapping and include each nucleoside of the antisense oligomeric compound; and the antisense oligomeric compound comprises from 20 to 24 linked nucleosides and each of the sense oligomeric compounds comprises from 10 to 12 linked nucleosides.
 2. The composition of claim 1 wherein the conformational geometry of each of said linked nucleosides is 3′-endo.
 3. The composition of claim 2 wherein each of said nucleosides having 3′-endo conformational geometry comprises a 2′-substituent group.
 4. The composition of claim 3 wherein each 2′-substituent group is, independently, —F, —OH, —O—CH₂CH₂—O—CH₃, —O—CH₃, —O—CH₂—CH═CH₂ or —O—CH₂—CH—CH₂—NH(R_(j)) where R_(j) is H or C₁-C₁₀ alkyl.
 5. The composition of claim 4 wherein each of said 2′-substituent groups is, independently, —F, —OH, —O—CH₂CH₂—O—CH₃ or —O—CH₃.
 6. The composition of claim 2 wherein at least one of said nucleosides has a 2′-OH group.
 7. The composition of claim 2 wherein each of said nucleosides are modified nucleosides having other than 2′-OH groups.
 8. The composition of claim 2 wherein at least one of said nucleosides is a bicyclic sugar nucleoside having a 2′-O—(CH₂)_(n)-4′ bridge wherein n is 1 or
 2. 9. The composition of claim 2 wherein at least one of said nucleosides is a 4′-S sugar modified nucleoside.
 10. The composition of claim 2 wherein each of said linked nucleosides is independently linked by a phosphodiester or a phosphorothioate internucleoside linking group.
 11. The composition of claim 1 wherein at least one of said antisense oligomeric compound and said two sense oligomeric compounds further comprises at least one terminal phosphate group, a terminal stabilizing or capping group, a 3′-overhang or a conjugate group.
 12. The composition of claim 11 wherein the 5′-terminus of said antisense oligomeric compound comprises a 5′-phosphate group.
 13. The composition of claim 1 wherein each of said sense oligomeric compounds is 10 nucleosides in length.
 14. The composition of claim 1 wherein said antisense oligomeric compound is 20 nucleosides in length.
 15. The composition of claim 14 wherein each of said linked nucleosides of said antisense oligomeric compound is linked by a phosphodiester internucleoside linking group.
 16. The composition of claim 14 wherein each of said linked nucleosides of said antisense oligomeric compound independently comprises a 2′-OH or a 2′-F substituent group.
 17. The composition of claim 1 wherein said antisense oligomeric compound is not covalently linked to either of said sense oligomeric compounds.
 18. A method of inhibiting gene expression comprising contacting one or more cells, a tissue or an animal with the composition of claim
 1. 